Common Purposes Blog

Common Purposes

What are the Common Purposes? I've dwelt on that question since first reading my alma mater's founding principle "for the purposes of instructing persons, who may choose to apply themselves, in the application of science to the common purposes of life". The question, more than any answer I may ever offer, has guided me through many personal and professional endeavors. And, if I have learned anything it is that I have derived my greatest joy when I, as part of a team, have made a lasting difference to improve the lives of others. Should the thoughts I share here and the ensuing discussion lead others to ask the same question, to seek their own answers and to experience the same joy as I, then I shall consider this effort of value.

Image: "The New Shoes" by Jane Bucci. This work is based on the touching photo snapped by Gerald Waller in 1946, in Austria. The little boy, who lived in an orphanage, had just been given new shoes by the American Red Cross.

Previous in Blog: The (Boeing 787 and Airbus A380 Aerospace) Show Must Go On   Next in Blog: Opportunities in Commercial Aircraft Growth
Close
Close
Close
13 comments
Rating: Comments: Nested

Joe Buck: Math Lightweight?

Posted January 15, 2007 4:50 PM by MillMatt

As icy weather started to descend on us Sunday afternoon, I chose to watch some (American) football on television. The game pitted the Seattle Seahawks against the Chicago Bears and was covered by a well-regarded team of announcers, including Joe Buck. During the game, one of the commentators shared that a key player had changed the spikes of his cleats so that he would have better traction on the soggy, grass field. Reference was made to spike lengths of 3/8", 1/2" and 5/8", to which Joe Buck replied that he did not know which fraction represented to greater length and, worst of all, he carried on about the matter well after his colleague's story ended.

Does it matter? Yes, it does because of the insidious and pervasive message that Joe Buck gave to millions of viewers that the most rudimentary math skills need not be taken seriously. Aside from showing his own educational shortcoming (I hope the faculty at Indiana University, his alma mater, take note), he slighted a very interesting commentary from his colleague about a matter of tactical importance in a competitive environment.

Sure, we have more pressing short-term matters to reduce our dependence on petroleum products, with car seats for children that do not provide adequate protection, with seemingly endless military conflicts and healthcare crises. But, I believe that the solution to solving these matters rests in our ability to communicate with one another; and, to do so effectively, our math skills are as important as our language skills.

Joe Buck is not alone in treating his weakness in math with disdain. I am sure CR4 readers can share many similar examples.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bolingbrook Illinois, a southwest suburb of Chicago.
Posts: 367
Good Answers: 3
#1

Re: Joe Buck: Math Lightweight?

01/15/2007 10:58 PM

Joe is a little older than the average retail clerk or restaurant hostess who can't figure or even count change. We are creating a generation of people who have lost the basic concepts of numbers, even the linear line represented by the numbers so formidable for poor Joe. I'm sure he feels that a magnitutde 5 star is 2X as bright as a 10, that a quake of mag 4 is half of a quake 8. I'm sure the concept of pi is beyond his contemplation. His only comprehension of 13 billion light years is how far away the real world is.

His attitude was that no one in the real world he lives in has any need to know the difference (especially the relationship) between such usless numbers as 3/8 or 5/8. And this is shown to the world as an expert at something.

The problem isn't entirely his. It also belongs to his bosses, mentors, educators, and the rest of us.

RichH

__________________
"People find it easier to forgive you for being wrong than for being right" J K Rawlings
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Stoke-on-Trent, UK
Posts: 4496
Good Answers: 137
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Joe Buck: Math Lightweight?

01/16/2007 4:20 AM

Too true - only thing I'd query is the magnitude 5 star - wouldn't Joe think it's half as bright as mag 10?

But to carry on the general point, I was talking to an equipment rep the other day who had taken time out from engineering to teach maths, in order to "de-stress" as he thought. A year of it nearly killed him and he was glad to get back to industry!

But that's an aside - have you noticed how if you say somebody is a bad driver or not too hot in bed, it's fighting talk, but they seem to think it's a badge of honour to be no good at maths? Strange. And we had in UK a few years back a Chief Inspector of Schools who in a radio interview couldn't work out 1/2 of 3/4.

__________________
Give masochists a fair crack of the whip
Reply
Power-User
Canada - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - New Member Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 103
Good Answers: 2
#10
In reply to #2

Re: Joe Buck: Math Lightweight?

01/18/2007 11:35 AM

Amen! It is very sad that people do seem to take pride in ignorance. I think it must be a little bit of a defence mechanism. I have a case in my own family - my husband and I are both engineers, and three of our four children are scientifically-minded. Unfortunately, my oldest daughter (currently in Grade 9) recently bought herself a T-shirt that says "I'm too pretty to do Math". Thankfully, she's still in Honours Math (not by her own choice), and her desire to do well makes her work at it hard enough to keep her marks up in the 90+ range. I hope she never degrades to the level of this Joe Buck.

__________________
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not "Eureka" but rather "Hmmmm... that's funny". - Isaac Asimov
Reply
Associate

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 28
#8
In reply to #1

Re: Joe Buck: Math Lightweight?

01/17/2007 12:13 AM

Right on. The state of math education is pretty abysmal. I used to do some tutoring to help kids improve their SAT scores and many of even the very brightest often either saw no point in math education or else did not know practical uses for the advanced math concepts they were learning.

Very sad. We are raising a generation of people who do not know how to think critically, write decently or do math. What will the country look like in 25 years? Are these the people who will be in public office or will we have a society that is even more stratified based on education, leaving even fewer at the top?

__________________
Boonying Trapurso - People's Institute for Synthetic Studies
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bolingbrook Illinois, a southwest suburb of Chicago.
Posts: 367
Good Answers: 3
#12
In reply to #8

Re: Joe Buck: Math Lightweight?

01/21/2007 4:38 PM

Your comment "Are these the people who will be in public office or will we have a society that is even more stratified based on education, leaving even fewer at the top?" really scares me. That top stratification doesn't seem to include anyone that could embarass any politician who can't add. Unless you want to sell your brains n a bucket, you have little value to our "society". The guy that can't create a toilet paper holder that will hold a roll becomes an "administrator", makes 2 or 3 times what the guy on the bench will ever make, and you think that smarts as far as being able to thnk for ones-self is of any value?

The most valueable person to our wonderfull corporations is the guy thaqt will steal everything and pass all of the blame on to his underlings. God forbid you EVER use the words "You're wrong about that."

RichH

__________________
"People find it easier to forgive you for being wrong than for being right" J K Rawlings
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 244
Good Answers: 18
#13
In reply to #1

Re: Joe Buck: Math Lightweight?

01/25/2007 8:16 PM

One thing you cannot leave out of the equation is the fact of liberal feel-good, intentions-were-good, self-esteem-without-accomplishment, left-wing nanny-state mentality dominance of the university system. It is the source of new teachers, and most states actually REQUIRE their teachers to contribute a fraction (not quite 3/8) of every paycheck to the union before they can be hired...speaking of government schools in the US, anyway.

Any time you have non-teaching bureaucrats skimming free paychecks off the top of others' labor so they can pander to politicians while controlling the HOW as well as the WHAT to teach kids at each age, and filtering the selection of which textbooks are allowed to be used thereby controlling indirectly what the publishers include, you have a recipe' for a slow dumming-down of the entire system based purely on a multitude of self-interest decisions made over the course of decades...the only kids who seem to be escaping are homeschooled or have active, involved parents to overcome the handicap of having to attend government facilities. (Not that we don't all have our shining example of those few inspiring teachers who excelled.)

What we get is the girl I handed 2 pennies and a nickel to last night with my $20 on a $4.32 bill...who had to call a manager to figure out what to do.

And then we have otherwise noble programs like "no child left behind" that are being short-circuited and twisted and sabotaged at every turn by those who have NO intention of ever being held accountable for performance.

The two teachers in our family often don't know what to think, so torn are they between not offending their friends and colleagues at work and in the union, and a desire to see some real competition to change things for the better for the kids.

Anything would help at this point - a tax credit against any Property Taxes (that fund the school district) for every dollar you spend on K-12 education would be a good start, I think. At least home owners who are paying the bill would have an instant choice of whether to pay the taxes and let the government do the work, or take their own same money and shop for a better school.

Vouchers would actually be great if anyone could get them through any legislature. The few trials that have been made to try to prove they don't work have instead been resounding successes nearly every time.

Charter schools have been a mixed bag of great success and some no better than the nearest failing regular government school.

Online resources for homeschooling like K12.com I hear are booming. Sounds good to me - leave it to the market to finally come up with some ways around the union and government roadblocks to success. Now if we could just claim the costs against our tax bill...

__________________
Call it 'half empty' or 'half full' if you must, I've got the other half in a redundant glass...
Reply
Guru
United States - Member - Engineering Consultant Popular Science - Evolution - Understanding

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bay Shore, NY
Posts: 715
#3

Re: Joe Buck: Math Lightweight?

01/16/2007 6:50 AM

MillMatt:

The math and science knowledge of the average person is abysmal. And that level of ignorance from a college graduate (?) no less.....

I have no idea what the answer is. But or society is becoming increasingly technically sophisticated, while the general population is falling further and further behind in their comprehension of technology. There are important issues that have to be decided by our society, yet so many voters and policy makers are ill equipped to even understand the issues being debated. There is a mindset about that posits that each person's opinion is equal ... of equal merit ... that there are no "absolutes", or even gradations. Where ignorant people will feel free to debate top experts in a field (not that an expert is infallible) on subjects they themselves either know precious little or are misguided. I do believe they have the right, but then for so many others to give them credence ... Most of the public in the U.S. doesn't even believe in evolution ... forget the science, its a plot by the secular humanists, or an attack on the Bible, or whatever, as if you can't believe in God and evolution... have no idea of what the various forms of "radiation" are .... don't know how a plane flies or a light bulb lights. But if you ask their opinion on nuclear energy, waste disposal (of any kind), energy options, etc, you can be sure they have one. It's frightening in its implications, living as we do in a democratic society.

I don't know where the solution may lie, but I think it has to start in the schools (which in their current state is little cause for optimism).

__________________
"The more I learn, the more ignorant I realize I am."
Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - Organizer Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2969
Good Answers: 33
#4

Re: Joe Buck: Math Lightweight?

01/16/2007 8:45 AM

Joe Buck is no John Madden, that's for sure. A Madden mathematical monologue could have gone something like this: "First, you got the 3/8th - that's the small one. Kind of like the kicker. You gotta have 'em, but they're the little guys. Then you got the 1/2 - that's the one in the middle - kind of like the center. Now, the big guys up on the front line? Well, they're kind of like the 5/8th."

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Joe Buck: Math Lightweight?

01/16/2007 9:47 AM

He would also find a way to work in a comparison of the sweat stains on players pants, and talk for 5 minutes about his trip to the hardware store to find a bolt he needed that taught him about "the fractions"

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#6

Re: Joe Buck: Math Lightweight?

01/16/2007 12:08 PM

Wow, Hope the center is actually one of the big guys. With regards to the whole joe buck issue, When Britney Spears, Paris Hilton or any of these people earn in a few months what most engineers will earn in a lifetime, and probably much more than most physicists will earn in a lifetime, why would anyone think that math was important in the US. We don't even expect our presidents or congress to have rudimentary skills anymore. I saw a comment yesterday about how engineers in some area are regarded as beneath realtors, to be a realtor you just have to commit to a decision between cosmetology school or realty school for a couple of weeks. I know Realtors in California make substantially more than a teachers, engineers or scientists. So how imporant can people really think math skills are? Americans seem to have come to the conclusion the world is a safe place. We can have the Chinese and Indians developing all our advanced technology in the future and we'll sell everything to the american people who work at Walmart, but are aspiring actors or musicians. Colleges and High Schools are no help. High School administrators want to get their State money and standardized testing leads to years of just test preparation. College administrators need the freshmen enrollment $ and make alot of money by getting unqualified people through the system. Education is a business, and it is the nature of management to find ways to charge more for less substantial return (and then seek a pay raise from the apparent greater profits). One idea i had was that intellectual properties for scientific/engineering properties needs to be changed to favor the scientific/engineering community more (instead of favoring the psuedo arts community so strongly). There needs to be a frivolous clause in intellectual properties, where people can't make claims to intellectual property right over frivolous things like music. You don't see people getting sued over referencing of scientific literature, or theories.

Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Midwest, USA
Posts: 19
#7

Re: Joe Buck: Math Lightweight?

01/16/2007 5:12 PM

I'm a '65 grad from SUNY. Nothing to brag about. My parents were from Europe and they prized education. My father told me, "They can always take your money but they can't take what you have up here" - pointing to his head. I passed that on to my kids, or at least I've tried to. From what I see from them, We have three, the point was made.

Knowledge is the real wealth, and you can take it with you.

__________________
WmS
Reply
Associate

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 38
#9

Re: Joe Buck: Math Lightweight?

01/17/2007 11:06 AM

Joe Buck is a moron. Plain and simple.

Hard to believe that someone with a college education doesn't know the difference between 5/8" and 3/8".

The question I have for Mr. Buck is if he was putting together a new bike for his kids and he had a 1/2" wrench in his hands and it wouldn't fit on the bolt because the wrench was to big would he get the 5/8" or the 3/8". Likely answer to the question is that he would pay some one else to put it together. Probably doesn't own a wrench.

Joe Buck - Stupid!

Reply
Guru
Philippines - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - Who am I?

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Mindanao, Philippines
Posts: 2147
Good Answers: 53
#11
In reply to #9

Re: Joe Buck: Math Lightweight?

01/19/2007 10:11 PM

Right on!

'Reminds me of a story an engineer friend said while he was working overseas. One of his co-workers was a really dense guy who somehow managed to find work as an engineer.

The guy, holding a bolt, walks up to my friend and asks him what size bolt it was. My friend took it and did one of his favorite gags. He put it to his nose, took a sniff, gave it back to the guy and said, "1/2".

The guy's eyes popped wide open and asked, "you can smell the size?". "Sure," my friend said. He took another bolt off the table, sniffed it and said, "here, this one's a 5/8 bolt. The smell's different."

When my friend left the guy, he saw him holding the two bolts and sniffing one and then the other.

'Course, we (my other friends who heard the same story) doubted that such a man exists. 'But then you hear about Joe Buck...

__________________
Miscommunication: when what people heard you say differs from what you said. Make yourself understood.
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 13 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (2); Boonying Trapurso (1); Codemaster (1); Data (1); Greg G (1); NoSciFi (2); PatyO (1); Sandman (1); Steve Melito (1); Vulcan (1); wmstutz (1)

Previous in Blog: The (Boeing 787 and Airbus A380 Aerospace) Show Must Go On   Next in Blog: Opportunities in Commercial Aircraft Growth

Advertisement