I'm not sure whether I asked about this previously or not; if so, I can't find it...
Most of the articles Ive read in the last several years indicate that rotary air compressors are more efficient than reciprocating compressors, but my measurements definitely indicate the contrary.
We have around 8 air compressors in our plant, although only 2 or 3 are normally in use. They are all old, mostly in the 20-30 year age bracket. We have purchased a power/energy logger, and I set it up to measure the power and energy used by a very noisy 50hp rotary compressor. To my dismay, I discovered that it uses the full 50hp, with virtually no reduction in power consumption under low consumption conditions; it was costing us $264 a day to operate.
We already had a 30-year-old reciprocating compressor with a 15hp motor installed as a backup. When we turned off the 50hp unit and switched over to the 15hp unit, we found that the 15hp unit, which turns off completely when the set pressure is reached, only ran 25-50% of the time. Thus the energy used is about 1/6 or less of the energy consumed by the rotary compressor. There is a bit larger variation in pressure, but that has not been a problem.
In our second principal building, we have two rotary compressors, only one of which is normally turned on at a given time, and both of them likewise consume essentially full power regardless of load, and are costing similar amounts of energy.
We want to buy at least one new compressor, and according to our recent experience, it's going to be a reciprocating compressor. Does anyone have any advice based on personal experience, not sales literature?