According to New Atlas there will be EHang 184 taxi drones operating in Dubai this July. So before we are using fully automated ground taxi comes the fully automated air taxi. I guess that makes sense. Dubai has a curious way of bypassing the extensive red tape. I won't be going to give it a go, but I'm sure reviews will be forthcoming. If it proves itself I can imagine they will pop up as a 'ride' in Vegas etc.
I doubt they will be point to point as in driveway to parking lot or the local baseball field anytime soon meaning it won't be a true taxi service. I'd give it a go. ..as a ride in Vegas, but it will probably be $50 / $75 to call one over + $5 per mile.
yeah. don't use the battery from notebooks. (lap tops) I don't care what they say about run time.. they all develop an ability to die without notice. It's villainous
Hmmmm . . . since you cannot feather the rotor blades, I guess you cannot autorotate like a conventional helicopter, but maybe as you drop out of the sky, you can "re-charge" the batteries for one last heroic thrust prior to touchdown.
I wouldn't want to do either, but I believe Hooker has been through an autorotation landing. He lives to tell about it. For non-rotorhead people, the very thought of an unpowered helicopter landing sounds particularly frightful. Most people will acknowledge an airplane's ability to glide. It's not intuitive to think of helicopters that way.
Yup, I've been along on dozens of autorotations in Chinooks. They used to be a standard emergency procedure, among others, to be demonstrated when qualifying a new pilot in my Hook unit. And, if we had a runway handy, we usually did them to a full stop on the ground. The runway allowed for a safe way to kill what forward momentum may be left without risking the helicopter. Especially since we had wheels, not skids.
But comparing a conventional helicopter to this little beastie is apples and oranges. In this thing there is no way to increase and store momentum in the rotor system on engine failure by changing the blade pitch to negative. And without an interlocked drive system like a tandem rotor helicopter, coordinating all the rotors would take a monumentally complex control system even if the blades had variable pitch.
And then there's the sticky problem of quickly picking a landing spot without a human to evaluate the conditions.
We had a discussion of this "thing" on one of my helicopter nets and the general consensus was "I'd rather WALK".
Hooker
PS - I'd still rather be in a helicopter than an airplane in an engine failure emergency. The goal for a helicopter is to meet the ground at zero or near zero airspeed. The best you can do in an airplane is stall speed.
Yes, and generally an airplane will have a larger skid foothill at the "landing" site.
People fly beasties that auto-rotate all the time (gyrocopters), but these have that needed push prop. When the engine dies, you are still autorotating, you just start losing forward momentum, and have less air over the rotor, slightly, so that you start falling faster...? Hitting barbed wire fence with this is not recommended my buddy tells me.
__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just build a better one.
You are essentially correct on gyro flight dynamics.
There's considerable difference between helicopters and gyrocopters. With gyro's the lift is generated by the wind moving up through the rotor disk where the airfoil shaped blades act more like a windmill. The resultant force can be likened to a close hauled sail on a sailboat or even the wing of an airplane. They must maintain forward airspeed to maintain rpm and lift, even during an engine failure, which in this case the rotor dynamics are no different from their normal flight, unlike a helicopter. As you say, gyrocopters are always autorotating. Helicopters can autorotate vertically, though forward airspeed greatly adds efficiency until the landing where forward airspeed is mostly dissipated.
I am, of course, referring to gyrocopters with fixed pitch rotor blades and fixed mast. There are other designs where the flight dynamics differ. And my description of the aerodynamics of a gyrocopter is overly simplified. For details, clike HERE.
Heh heh, he's not the first (or last) to get hung up on a perimeter fence.
That kinda reminds me of the time we landed my Hook at home base with a couple hundred feet of commo wire trailing behind the aft right landing gear. We low leveled a lot but I never figured out where we picked to up.
Actually, I wonder if the masterful engineers on this have considered emergency charging during fall as last ditch effort to save the passenger!
I believe it needs that. It also will have or will need to have autonomous other vehicle avoidance system based on ?? radar? infrared?? microwaves?? visible??
__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just build a better one.
Birds that pass through the UAE in the thousands include almost all species of small and big-sized waders such as plovers, stints, snipes, sandpipers, godwits, curlews, whimbrels, turnstones, ruffs, all species of gulls barring the Sooty Gull that is partly resident and mostly migratory, ducks, teals, Great Cormorant, terns and flamingos.
I would be more concerned the thing would fly into a dense flock of startled flamingos. Dubui is along major migratory routes between Africa and the north, all the way to arctic. Millions of birds fly through there - and just about the time they're starting up this service. August sees a lot of birds through there. Dubai is the last place I would start a flying taxi service.
Once they kill a sheikh or two this service will auger-in faster than you can say "Allah akbar."
I hear you there.. And we've seen plenty of quadcop footage where they are being run into by all types of currious birds.
An anti bird defense system would add more poundage.
Hmmm... I have a business partner/friend that was working on just such a system. I might just give him a call. It's a unique aproach that's lightweight, harmless and may be useful.
I think Arnold had a little trouble with an driver-less taxi!!
__________________
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not "Eureka" but rather "Hmmmmm...that's funny" - Isaac Asimov 1920-1992