According to my interpretation of a conversion chart, 10,000 foot pounds equals 13.5 kilowatts. Does that mean 1000 pounds of water falling 10 feet can theoretically generate 13.5 kilowatts of electricity? It sounds high to me.
It appears your interested in calculations for hydro-power.
First lets define (P)ower. Power is equal to (Work)/(t)ime. P=W/t.
Lets look at at the equation for (W)ork and (E)nergy as defined by (t)ime and
(P)ower. E = W = P*t
When dealing with gravitational energy (hydro-energy) the E=(m)ass * (acceleration of (g)ravity * (h)eight. E=m*g*h
P=E/t=m*g*h/t
Using the MKS system and then converting with the watt as the unit for power. The meter as the unit for length and the kilogram as the mass unit.
Converting to the MKS system
using the conversions of lbs*.4536=kg: ft * .3048= meters
10000lbs*.4536=4536 kg: 10ft*.3048=3.048 m : 9.8 m/s/s = g
E in joules = 4536 * 9.8 * 3.048
13855.5894 joules. Setting the time at 1 second means that
10000 lbs of water falling 10 feet every second would approximate a potential rate change in energy of 13855.5894 jouls per second or 13.855.5894 KW.
Given the above and an initial velocity of 0 m/s the water will increase the in velocity from
E=.5*m*v^2 = m*g*h
.5*v^2 = g*h
v squared = 2*g*h
V= sqrt(2*g*h)
7.7292 m/s = 2.355865 ft/s
Will the recovered energy approximate the .5 * m * (turbine inlet velocity - turbine outlet velocity)squared * coefficient of turbine generator efficiency?
If so then maybe we SHOULD produce our power DC, allowing us to reduce the turbine spin velocity, converting more of the gravitational potential, and then converting it to AC for transmission?
Would somebody tell me again the advantage of high voltage AC VS high voltage DC transmission. From memory, I thought the RMS value of a sine wave was somewhere around .707. Does this mean that I can send only 70.7 percent the power using AC VS DC at the same potential? Are there greater inductive losses using AC VS DC?
This decision couldn't possibly been influenced by some poor elephant martyr during the AC jihad of Mr. Edison could it ? Another decision made on sound and unemotional scientific evidence (poor elephant) by the experts; and probably made in the light of the earliest true altruistic medical/military/industrialist values.
Gavilan
__________________
"The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark." -- Michelangelo
Ac had two advantages over dc: (1) you could change voltages in a transformer (cheap and readily available) so that you could transmit high voltage/low current/low losses long distances and then provide safer low voltage/high current for homes and businesses; and (2) Edison advertised that ac could be used to kill people and state governors all over America wanted that.
Tom
__________________
"Well, I've wrestled with reality for 35 years, Doctor, and I'm happy to state I finally won out over it." Elwood P. Dowd
There is an inconsistency of units here. The foot-pound is a unit of energy. The kilowatt is a unit of power, which is a rate of energy, or energy per unit time.
__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
I believe it was in the late 60's or early 70's that Southern Cal Edison built a DC transmission line from way up north, either Washington or Oregon State to Sylmore in southern California. A friend of mine was a power scheduler and I seem to remember him saying that there were many problems with the converter stations, and other interuptions that made the line less desireable than projected. I think it was later converted to a conventional AC line by adding a wire. All of this is going by my memory, which I often say is like a steel sieve! Of course also that was 60'd technology and probably would be much better today. May be some info on the net about this. -- JHF
__________________
If it's too good to be true, it probably isn't
Oh the joys of myriad units and quantities! Sometimes I wonder how any technological advancement could have occurred before the metric system! Foot-pound force is a unit of energy, pound-foots (or pound-feet???) are torque, watts are power and according to Mr Hawking even the unit of time is variable :-(
This free unit conversion utility I have used for years, it even makes interesting - if not a little frightening - perusal, just to see how many of the damn things there are!