Previous in Forum: Ralfativity pt 4: The Doppler Shift Ratio   Next in Forum: Seeking Plumbing Advice
Close
Close
Close
4 comments
Rating: Comments: Nested
Power-User

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 465

Ralfativity pt 1: The Differences Between Relativity and Ralfativity

11/07/2018 3:56 PM

1. Einstein once said, "A theory should be as simple as possible (but not simpler)." One of the cornerstones of relativity is that both space and time bend to keep the speed of light constant from all perspectives. Anyone who attacks this principle is doomed to be ignored. However, in the spirit of keeping a theory as simple as possible, ralfativity can explain all relativistic phenomena and solve all relativistic problems without once relying on length contraction or violating the constancy of c. Only time need bend to maintain the constancy of c in ralfativity.

2. The only stationary perspective is the one within one's own frame. When two frames are involved in relative motion, both are seen from the others perspective as moving. This does not preclude one from being depicted as stationary and the other depicted as moving. However, in ralfativity, there is no such thing as a moving or stationary perspective wrt relative velocity, only the perspectives of the participants and the moving or stationary depictions of those perspectives.

3. There are two main presents or realities in ralfativity. (The definition of reality in relativity is considered a philosophical discussion.) The first is the instantaneous present that connects all proper time clock readings within all frames. The 2nd is the delayed present due to the speed of light delay between relatively moving frames separated by distance. Ralfativity considers these as perspectives rather than realities. Another perspective that mimics the true instantaneous reality is from an an intermediate frame that has the same "half" velocity relative to the two participants. For example, at .6c, this frame would be depicted as .33c.

An example of instantaneous present is if the sun were plucked from the sky, our delayed reality would be orbiting and receiving light from nothing for 8 minutes. We almost never have any access to the instantaneous present and must post-process it to determine what it was in the past unless both participants are co-located.

4. Ralfativity defines the cause of permanent age difference from the twin paradox due to the delay of information between one frame making a velocity change and the other receiving notification. One thinks its relative velocity is different from what the other knows and this causes profound effects right down to the instantaneous reality. Relativity has another view for the cause which would take too long to describe all the rules and caveats here. Acceleration has been given magical qualities for being the cause but ralfativity does not recognize it as such.

5. Ralfativity can make predictions of when age difference occurs before relativity says its established. It can also define age difference in scenarios where the rules of relativity prohibit its establishment.

6. Ralfativity STD's always depict two participants and a common reference frame and usually an intermediate perspective that mimics the instantaneous present. Relativity also includes a common reference frame in its depictions but will deny doing so.

7. Ralfativity uses v'=Yv and a mixed perspective of Bob's space and Alice's time x/t'. Ralfativity also uses c' through moving frames to normalize the unbalanced length of depicted light signals sent to depicted moving frames. Relativity only uses v=x/t and c.

8. Ralfativity only needs to consider one depiction and that's usually relative to an earth frame with distance markers established between Bob and Alice when both at 0c relatively. Bob is depicted as stationary, Alice as moving even though both perspectives are moving. This is not a preferred frame but a chosen way of depicting the relative velocity from infinite and equivalent depictions. Relativity freaks out when this method is employed even though it uses the same method but always needlessly includes a 2nd STD with stationary and moving perspectives reversed.

9. Everything moves at the combined rate of c according to the formula c2=vx2+vt2 where vx is the velocity through space and vt is the velocity through time. Relativity also believes this but will deny it.

10. Distance separation stores time missing from time dilated clock readings. This is not explicitly and so nakedly stated in relativity.

11. Space cannot have a relative velocity to anything moving through it. Similarly, the relative velocity of anything to c is always c. Both theories agree here.

12. The frame rotation in ralfativity between Bob and Alice is a simple coordinate rotation. In relativity it's the same except the rotated frame coordinates are folded back over the x-axis of the stationary cartesian coordinates to create the rhombic Minkowski coordinates. Ralfativity cuts off the fold so the x-axis values are shared between both frames.

__________________
What sparks the intelligent, inflames the ignorant.
Register to Reply
Pathfinder Tags: relativity
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Power-User

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 465
#1

Re: Ralfativity pt 1: The Differences Between Relativity and Ralfativity

11/10/2018 9:15 AM

More differences:

13. Ralfativity has abandoned Einstein's clock sync method in favour of adopting the universal accuracy of atomic clocks and the fact that light signal age messages, along with monitoring relative velocity using doppler shift TV, are all that's needed to determine distance separation, reciprocal time dilation and age difference.

14. Time is not what clocks measure. Age (the time through time) is what clocks measure. Time is a combination of clock and distance (the time through space) measurements.

15. Since the Minkowski coordinate transform has been replaced by a simple coordinate rotation, all the transform formulas in relativity have been changed including those in the 4-vector.

16. Age difference can only be established upon co-location of information not co-location of participants. Co-location of participants in the instantaneous present is irrelevant.

17. The relative velocity of co-located participants is irrelevant. This is true for both theories but it's never explicitly stated in relativity.

18. There is nothing special about the 0 velocity frame. Age difference comparisons can be made between any relative velocity frames.

19. Relativity believes it's impossible to show the progression of age difference before the end of the spacetime path. Ralfativity does not believe this but has been unsuccessful so far in mathematically proving its case. The numbers are close to what's expected but not exactly what's expected.

__________________
What sparks the intelligent, inflames the ignorant.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 465
#2

Re: Ralfativity pt 1: The Differences Between Relativity and Ralfativity

11/13/2018 9:10 AM

The 3 main battlegrounds between relativity and ralfativity are these:

1. The definition and differences between reality, perspective and depiction. Ralfativity has 2 realities in an instantaneous present and a delayed present caused by a non-instantaneous, limited speed of information transfer. Bob and Alice's perspectives are from each of their delayed presents. Bob and Alice's perspectives are depicted in a Minkowski STD as alternatively stationary or moving but in truth both are moving relative to each other and thus their perspectives are moving relative to each other. Perspective is not the same as depiction of perspective.

2. The cause of age difference. Ralfativity dictates that age difference results during the delay of information between when relative velocity is changed by one participant and that change is received by the other participant. This allows for the establishment of age difference sooner than relativity can and in scenarios that relativity can't establish age difference. Ralfativity will (soon) be able to show the way age difference progresses during the propagation of the info of a velocity change which relativity says is impossible to do.

3. There is no length contraction (which is one of the pillars of relativity). Ralfativity replaces that purely mathematical construct x'=Yx with another, v'=Yv. It's all just algebra and what term you want to associate gamma (Y) with, no need to invent a physical phenomenon from it. Bob sees Alice move at Yv which is a mixed perspective of her time and Bob's space (space now becomes invariant and shared from all perspectives). What people don't realize is that relativity also uses a mixed perspective. Dilation is from Bob's stationary (depicted) perspective, and contraction is from Alice's moving (depicted) perspective as is shown in the following STD:

P.S. I know simple algebra might as well be hieroglyphics but this is how simple it is to understand. There is no need for length contraction:

from Bob's perspective

v=x/t

v'=Yv =Yx/t

t=Yt' so v'=Yx/Yt' = x/t'

x=Yx' (length dilation from Bob's perspective)

so v'=YYx'/t

from Alice's perspective x'=Yx and x=x'/Y so v'=Yx'/Yt =x'/t

__________________
What sparks the intelligent, inflames the ignorant.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 465
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Ralfativity pt 1: The Differences Between Relativity and Ralfativity

11/13/2018 9:28 AM

P.S. The equations in relativity need to start keeping track of perspective because just saying the formulas for length contraction x'=Yx and time dilation t=Yt' are wrong (unless you include from which perspective).

If people believe the theory of relativity is wrong, they need to start proving that mathematically. Just saying "because Einstein said so" or "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" may be good ol' fashioned rural wisdom but I don't find those arguments good, wise or even valid. Just point out where my algebra goes wrong. In movies about math, people can just read math like it was a language with meaning. Are those people only in the movies?

__________________
What sparks the intelligent, inflames the ignorant.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 465
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Ralfativity pt 1: The Differences Between Relativity and Ralfativity

11/13/2018 10:22 AM

Technically the equations for dilation and contraction should be:

1. Length and time dilation:

from Bob's perspective x=Yx', t=Yt'

2. Length and time contraction:

from Alice's perspective x'=Yx" , t'=Yt"

from Bob's perspective of Alice's perspective plug these two equations into the top two: x=YYx", t=YYt"

Let's check the formulae using the numbers from the STD:

Length dilation from Bob's perspective x=Yx', 3.125= 1.25 * 2.5 yes

Length contraction from Alice's perspective x'=Yx", 2.5 = 1.25 * 2 yes

Bob's perspective of Alice's perspective of length contraction x=Y2x", 3.125 = 1.5625 * 2 yes

Time dilation from Bob's perspective t=Yt', 3.125= 1.25 * 2.5 yes

Time contraction from Alice's perspective t'=Yt", 2.5 = 1.25 * 2 yes

Bob's perspective of Alice's perspective of time contraction t=Y2t", 3.125 = 1.5625 * 2 yes.

Relativity tries to obfuscate all this with imprecise terms. Why?

__________________
What sparks the intelligent, inflames the ignorant.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Register to Reply 4 comments

Previous in Forum: Ralfativity pt 4: The Doppler Shift Ratio   Next in Forum: Seeking Plumbing Advice

Advertisement