I think I know "Hecht''s" big brother. The point is that most discussions about photons has to do with their electrical fields, while thier magnetic feilds are ignored.
__________________
"Perplexity is the beginning of dementia" - Professor Coriolus
why is optical thinking concentrated on electrical fields?
May be we have all the electrically insulating nonmagnetic materials where the dielectric constant is important but the relative permeablity is more or less very near to 1?
Do you know any magnetic material that is used for its magnetic characteristics at optical frequencies?
I doubt that microwave garnets are useful to that frequency range, but I don't know.
circular polarization is the sum of 2 linear perpendicular polarizations, with a relative phase of lambda/2.
45° linear polarization is the same, but with phases accorded
in the end, your output will be the same, in terms of beam intensity: half the input.