Initial Motion

Leave my family out of this.

_{English is such a wonderfully ambiguous language.}

As opposed to a dead language like Latin.

Even aunt holes are relative.Without them,we would have no cousins.

Obviously,my posting created a reaction somewhere that resulted in the deleting of the text.I am pretty certain of that...I think.

Seems your initial post had motion; moved right off the thread.

It's existence was uncertain...

Yes,but who\what pushed it?

...and against what (need-to-know basis)?

Define motion. Have you ever had a class or lecture about motion? They have classes on all kinds of motion. Falling motion, colliding motion, emission motion and spinning motion.

But how about a definition of motion. We have all types of motion, but what is it? Motion is energy. Energy is a simple property, not an entity. All things have this property, the property of motion.

And all physical entities have this property......a perpetual property. The physical entities are always in motion. It can never be stopped. Zero temp does NOT stop motion. Zero only removes external motion, the jiggle of environmental fields. Zero does not remove the internal jiggle. The internal jiggle is what keeps mass and matter together. This happens at zero too.

MOTION(energy) is not conserved. The non conserved motion gives us a blanket of static thru-out space.

All electrons and protons come with the same amount of material. We call it e. The inertia of that material can be varied with motion. NOT the amount of material....it's the motion of the material that gives us the illusion of mass and matter. Mass and matter are confined motions.

Energy is any and all motion, mass is confined motion. And we can ratio it. Mass and matter is NOT an amount of material.......it's the amount of motion of the material.

We have the ability to study and define it, but we will never know how it all started. Because one causal event can cause millions of reactions. Which in turn, revert to causal actions.

AND it is impossible to determine what this material is. For it is the only material there is......and we have nothing left to compare it to. All of man's knowledge is comparative knowledge. Our knowledge is this to that, without knowing what this and that truly are.

Some questions can be answered and some questions can not be answered. The how, the when and the why all this started, or even if it had a start, can NOT be answered.

Lot's of time and money is wasted on this.

Motion is the relative position of two or more objects.Motion cannot be measured without a reference.Space is required for the objects to occupy.

Time is actually a measure of space.We measure time with distance on a basic level and vice versa.

Light years,etc.still,it is a measure of relative position of the observer and the object.

One could not measure anything without motion,which is a measure of space vs time.

All relative motion......is absolute motion. Bound by omnipresent time and length. All motion is absolute motion. Motion can be nothing else.

A constant velocity is impossible. For nothing is at rest. The area of velocity needs to be still for a constant velocity.

Space-time is a convenient, lazy and cheap theory, for nothing can be measured with it. Any displacement measurement is useless.

No previous concepts have any meaning with space-time. A fantasy thought science. Pure fiction. A purely mathematical solution. Math is born of motion, motion is not a result of math.

An abdication of intellect and curiosity. The great bummer of wonderment.

IMO.

Mass is not an amount, it's the state of motion, of a set and constant amount.

The first reported motion(action) was light. From several sources. The emitter receives NO reaction from this action. All respects to Newton.

Physics mysteries can be solved by watching a hay baler. I use to ponder those deep red shifts and the velocities they suggest. So then I thought perhaps it's gravity causing this. And of course the present solution is expanding space. Expanding space would satisfy the physics without breakage of it.

But space has no physicality or properties in which to vary. For me this was the most hair brained solution ever.

But I have found my solution. From baling hay. A square hay baler drops bales of hay on the field. The hay bales are the same size. And when the velocity of the baler changes, the only thing that changes is the space between the bales. It's kind of an inversion of pulse width modulation.

Space width modulation. With a constant duration "on" time. A natural occurrence with a moving emitter.

Duty cycle light. Only varied by the "off" time. The space time.

Very deep shifts. With under c velocities. And no space expansion needed.

A duty cycle shift, with a constant on time, not a sinewave shift. This is very asymmetrical For our instruments and our calculations.

Who reported the first motion and to whom?

If you believe the bible:In Genesis: In the beginning there was the void,and darkness was upon the face of the deep.Then God said "Let there be light,and there was light"

Not exactly scientific,but it appears to reflect modern theories of the big bang,along with the other generations of creation mentioned there..In Genesis, Creation was put into terms humans could understand; Days,etc,and each could have been billions of years between.To a timeless Entity,time is irrelevant.

Once again the theologic bias of the Big Bang scientific theory reappears. Many people forget a catholic priest was part of the initial proposal. Many people also forget that the theory does not address whatever happened before the explosion nor if any of the universal laws existed until the Bang created a universe.

Some of our cultural creation stories, at that time all there was was stories, and some of our newest scientific theories(more stories?) go along these lines although the light might not have been visible. A different color light.

This is pure conjecture and the only evidence for this proposal is a baled hay field.

Some think in bathtubs some think in hay fields.

And pray tell: What evidence was found in the baled hay field, and to which scientific theories did that evidence relate?

The frequency is defined as one on time(bale) and one off time(space between bales). This is duty cycle frequency.

In a hay field, if the tractor is going at a constant velocity, The frequency would be the length of the bale....plus the space to the next bale.

Therefore.....if tractor is at same speed, space between bales will be equal. AND can be adjusted and set by tractor speed. If tractor goes slow, little space between bales. if tractor goes fast, large space between bales.

IF the tractor is accelerating.....each sequential space will be longer.......and if tractor is decelerating....each sequential space will be shorter. Chirping.

The ONLY circumstance where light would have the same velocity to all observers is if all objects had zero velocity. Perfectly still.

So, light does not have a constant velocity.......But it does have a constant length. Even expanding space could not change that length.

The only thing that changes with motion is the distance, and therefore the time, between those constant lengths.

Space width modulation. Light is a duty cycle, not a symmetric frequency. The only time light is symmetrical, is when there is no relative motion. A 50% duty cycle. Changing the duty cycle with space, is much different than shifting a sine wave. Shifting sound is symmetrical, shifted light is not. Only the "off time" of the duty cycle changes.