Previous in Forum: R&D/ Operator   Next in Forum: ppt on modern earthing techniques
Close
Close
Close
8 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Commentator

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 91

IR Rays

01/07/2008 7:29 AM

hi, could you tell me in detail why we are using IR rays for data transmission (like in mobile phones) .which specific property plays role for this application? can't we use other rays like UV...???

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Anonymous Poster
#1

Re: IR Rays

01/07/2008 10:55 AM

Well, think about it for a minute. What are the safety considerations about using the pushbuttons on a UV-emitting television remote, when using it could give those in the same room a sun-tan?

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#2

Re: IR Rays

01/07/2008 12:28 PM

I'm trying to patent my neutrino remote control. In theory it should work from any location in the house. Or in the world, if pointed accurately enough. I've got the remote working great, but I'm having trouble with the receiver.

Regards,

Atrocious

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Etats Unis
Posts: 1871
Good Answers: 45
#3
In reply to #2

Re: IR Rays

01/08/2008 12:19 AM

I suggest you talk to the people in Japan. I hear they have a really nice neutrino receiver buried deep underground. Maybe you could link the event back to your TV via the internet or satellite.

__________________
The hardest thing to overcome, is not knowing that you don't know.
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Gone to Alabama with my banjo on my knee...
Posts: 5595
Good Answers: 20
#4

Re: IR Rays

01/08/2008 11:38 AM

I'm probably going to minimize the detail more than you'd like, but I'll try to provide a serious answer. IR is not as subject to blocking and interference as would be visible light. Strong sunlight or artificial lamps would keep that kind of device from functioning properly. UV might work, but is much more energy hungry, and also has a much shorter effective range.

Microwave length might work, but then you have even more energy required, and limited bandwidth due to uses like radio and radar transmissions. Below IR, you get into heat, which also has obvious limitations, and past far UV...well you should be getting the picture. The energy accountancy (so it can be battery-powered and not need new ones every day) and real-world effectiveness (will it work well under most in-home conditions?) are the main determining factors. Hope this helps.

__________________
Veni, vidi, video - I came, I saw, I got it on film.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 378
Good Answers: 24
#5

Re: IR Rays

01/08/2008 1:21 PM

IR IS NOT used in mobile phones. It is widely used in remote controls for data transmission because it is easily generated by efficient LED's, is not subject to interference by ambient (natural or artificial) light in the home, has reasonable range, has sufficient band with to carry the data swiftly. It is CHEAP to use.

__________________
Keith E Bowers, PMP
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 336
Good Answers: 5
#6

Re: IR Rays

01/08/2008 4:19 PM

In some cases, IR links are used as a replacement to microwave links in data communications, including cellular telephony (not mobile phones) for communication between base stations. IR has similar performance with microwave BUT is not radio! This means that in most countries you don't need to pay for a license to use IR. Radio-spectrum, as being a very limited natural resource (already exhausted!), is managed by governments, is highly regulated and expensive.

UV is absorbed differently than IR in free space (air) and I have no knowledge of UV transmitters (solid state lasers) available for data communications. IR lasers are all over the place... Another thing is that UV radiation could be very harmful to any living creature. So, I'll stick with IR.

Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 91
#7

Re: IR Rays

01/09/2008 11:33 AM

thanks a lot sirs for ur valueable information.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Orlando
Posts: 242
Good Answers: 3
#8

Re: IR Rays

01/09/2008 10:52 PM

Once again, an inquiry has gone awry with incomplete given info on the upside.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 8 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (2); Bill ML (1); EnviroMan (1); Hottech (1); Keith E Bowers (1); raj (1); rcapper (1)

Previous in Forum: R&D/ Operator   Next in Forum: ppt on modern earthing techniques
You might be interested in: UV Filters, UV Sensors, UV Light Systems

Advertisement