Previous in Forum: Making Stainless Steel Vacuum Flasks   Next in Forum: Fighting for Efficiency
Close
Close
Close
7 comments
Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8

Rule of Thumb for Remaining Wall Thickness on Threaded Insert Repair

01/14/2008 10:04 AM

In the aviation industry, we're heavily regulated by OEM & Federal "Acceptable Methods, Techniques and Practices". As such, I'd be interested in your input on the following hypothetical repair:

Problem: Pulled Threads in Aluminum Housing (2024-T4)

Proposed Repair: Threaded Insert (Heli-Coil)

Repair Dimensions: Remaining wall thickness after tapping for Heli-Coil = 0.070".

Per the OEM standard practice governing maintenance on this unit, the proposed repair would be considered unacceptable since the remaining wall thickness would fall below the 0.090" min requirement. Based on experience in your respective industries, would you be able to proceed with this repair?

Thanks in advance for your input.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Comments rated to be "almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, rate them!
Guru
Spain - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 716
Good Answers: 25
#1

Re: Rule of Thumb for Remaining Wall Thickness on Threaded Insert Repair

01/15/2008 2:38 AM

Hi,

In all industries we all have some types of regulations, standards, etc. to follow.

It is supposed that people who issued the requirements took into account all the design considerations (including "safety factors").

So, if you try to change any limitation, you must know all considerations the designers had in mind and evaluate the decission at your own risk.

In other words, I only would change a requirement if I know perfectly all design conditions (ambient, load cases, etc) and after the corresponding evaluation.

My recommendation: Don't accept that repair.

__________________
It's stupid to discuss about AI: We´ve reached by the "B" way. We' ve producing men as clever as machines.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru
Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member Egypt - Member - Member since 02/18/2007

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Posts: 1733
Good Answers: 246
#2

Re: Rule of Thumb for Remaining Wall Thickness on Threaded Insert Repair

01/15/2008 5:09 AM

Per code OEM & Federal "Acceptance Methods, Techniques and Practices", this repair is not accepted.

Otherwise, you can proceed a stress analysis to find the stresses through that part of reduced wall thickness, and compared with the accepted stress figures.

__________________
It is better to be defeated on principles, than to win on lies!
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8
#3

Re: Rule of Thumb for Remaining Wall Thickness on Threaded Insert Repair

01/15/2008 9:14 AM

To ask another way, what "rule of thumb" exists in other industries use for remaining wall thickness? The standard we generally work to falls between 0.070"-0.090". I was just curious as to what "standards" others may be using. (More of a general question)

Thanks for the input.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 378
Good Answers: 24
#4

Re: Rule of Thumb for Remaining Wall Thickness on Threaded Insert Repair

01/15/2008 12:05 PM

You would have to have the OEM/PMA manufacturer review the proposed repair, do whatever analysis THEY require in order to accept the proposed repair. YOU can legally ONLY conform to the presently acceptable repair tolerances. Any deviation MUST be sanctioned in writing by the OEM/PMA manufacturer.

__________________
Keith E Bowers, PMP
Register to Reply
Power-User
Australia - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Marine Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 451
Good Answers: 16
#5

Re: Rule of Thumb for Remaining Wall Thickness on Threaded Insert Repair

01/16/2008 7:11 PM

I have dealt with cases where the wall thickness for a thread was inadequate by adding additional weld metal to outside of a flange to a metallurgist's requirements. This was followed by a full heat treatment. Is this the sort of information you are interested in?

__________________
Make it so.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 302
Good Answers: 4
#6

Re: Rule of Thumb for Remaining Wall Thickness on Threaded Insert Repair

01/17/2008 5:19 PM

There are many way to repair thread. Helicoil is only one. There are other kind of inserts. You can drill it out and weld a solid piece in then tap it again. You can epoxy the hole then tap it. You can drill the whole thing out and replace with thread rivet or PEM insert.

Rule of thumb: If you got a bad feeling about it, don't do it.

__________________
Pineapple
Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 31078
Good Answers: 826
#7

Re: Rule of Thumb for Remaining Wall Thickness on Threaded Insert Repair

06/16/2023 10:00 AM

<...unacceptable...> to whom?

That is the direction of travel for these sorts of questions, for that is where the liability lays.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 7 comments
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Comments rated to be "almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, rate them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Abdel Halim Galala (1); BlueAussieBoy (1); Jetmxmanager (1); Keith E Bowers (1); Kwetz (1); Pineapple (1); PWSlack (1)

Previous in Forum: Making Stainless Steel Vacuum Flasks   Next in Forum: Fighting for Efficiency

Advertisement