Previous in Forum: Specific Heat   Next in Forum: Hot Gases to Electrical Power
Close
Close
Close
7 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Anonymous Poster

Copper and Led metallurgy

01/21/2008 8:41 AM

HI Everyone,

We use a metal of 23% Led and remaining Copper with traces of <1% of Nickel and others.....This is used to block the X-ray leakage from a device. Now with this, the leakage doesn't seem to be satisfactorily controlled. For which the solution thought was to increase the Led content to 30%. But with this combination the casting(sand casting - since low volume production) we have problems of porosity and blowholes. And on the question of why copper- its for the best thermal conduction.

We are trying to figure out as to how to control the casting defects with this metallurgical combination or alternate solution to suit our application.

Any suggestion in this regard are whole heartedly welcomed and thanks in advance for the ones contributing.

Mr.Idiotalways

Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Anonymous Poster
#1

Re: Copper and Led metallurgy

01/21/2008 8:47 AM

Since pressure die casting or gravity die casting are ruled out in this case suggest to look

>Increase the thickness of the component (if design constraints are not there)

>Make sure that the leakage is only because of the component and no open wells.

>Try combining with Aluminium which as equally good therrmal properties

>Try rotational / Centrifugal casting if the component is cylindrical ( since led density is more, this will help in uniform mixing of the same)

Also from my experience, the metallurgical combination is not a viable one I guess.

Reply
2
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Petroleum Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 3403
Good Answers: 150
#2

Re: Copper and Led metallurgy

01/21/2008 10:00 AM

Depending on the type of radiation present, lead can be a poor choice because if neutrons are present, lead can be neutron activated and transmute to Pb-210 which is itself radioactive. Polyethylene can absorb neutrons so many shielding systems put a layer of polyethylene between the radioactive source and lead to prevent the lead from being neutron activated. Another option is tungsten instead of lead. This has the side benefit of being non-toxic. Many medical devices are using polyethylene with tungsten powder mixed in as a composite shielding system that is lighter than the equivalent amount of lead.

__________________
Who is John Galt?
Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Petroleum Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 3403
Good Answers: 150
#7
In reply to #2

Re: Copper and Led metallurgy

01/22/2008 12:30 PM

I will add that X-rays in of themselves are blocked by lead quite well, but the problem is that many other materials when bombarded with x-rays will give off neutrons. Polyethylene acts to slow the neutron gradually instead of slowing it abruptly, thereby eliminating the ability of the neutron to transmute the lead.

You can read more about that kind of radiation here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Braking_radiation

__________________
Who is John Galt?
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 303
Good Answers: 5
#3

Re: Copper and Led metallurgy

01/22/2008 8:17 AM

You could spray the mold surfaces with a tungsten alloy then continue the molding process. The shell that would be left on the outside of the part would have good conductive properties and would also prevent any lead migration from the part. This also provides extra containment as well as offering a finished looking part.

__________________
"I had not anticipated that the work would present any great difficulites" SHACKLETON
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 178
Good Answers: 4
#4

Re: Copper and Led metallurgy

01/22/2008 11:00 AM

I would try a vacuum degas before pouring the casting. Remove all slag and heat the molds as porosity can be caused by shrinkage if it cools the melt too fast.

Can you hold the melt long enough to get an analysis? Sometimes variations in composition can worsen the effect.

If specific areas are a problem, look into putting a heat sinking material in the mold. You will have to research this as I don't remember 35 years back very well any more.

__________________
Bill H.
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 178
Good Answers: 4
#5

Re: Copper and Led metallurgy

01/22/2008 11:07 AM

One other thing, I also used to repair some casting defects with a method called "spray welding" which involved grinding out the defect and using an oxy-acetylene torch with a cannister of flux and powdered mix of the alloy. The unit had a way of feeding the powder into the flame. This was nodular iron and the defects were found with ultrasonic test instruments. The repairs were typically higher quality than the casting.

__________________
Bill H.
Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Systems Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Model Rocketry - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Long.92E,Lat.26N
Posts: 1336
Good Answers: 14
#6

Re: Copper and Led metallurgy

01/22/2008 12:23 PM

fill from below into a water-cooled Pure Copper Split mould.

Porosity will vanish

Your problems --gone

Reply
Reply to Forum Thread 7 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); Bill H. (2); MUKULMAHANT (1); NiCrMoNoMore (1); Rorschach (2)

Previous in Forum: Specific Heat   Next in Forum: Hot Gases to Electrical Power

Advertisement