Previous in Forum: Copper Winding Weight in 13.5 Megawatt Turbine   Next in Forum: Question On MCCB Tripping
Close
Close
Close
8 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 8

Energy

02/04/2008 3:54 AM

Since the earth has a net negative charge all we need is a positive potential to establish a difference. Any ideas?

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Olde Member!! Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Dunstable, England
Posts: 2821
Good Answers: 45
#1

Re: Energy

02/04/2008 8:05 AM

That's a rather sweeping statement..

Has the Earth a net negative charge?? Where are your information sources?

John.

__________________
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing - Googling is far worse!
Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#3
In reply to #1

Re: Energy

02/04/2008 2:59 PM

Hi John,

How are you. Most of the earth is consisted of iron, (actually of its mass of 5.98x10^24kg, 32.1% is iron) and iron is a very good electrical conductor since it has an atomic number of 26. Current electricity is primarily the flow of electrons from a -ve to a +potential, so since electrons of iron are 'easy' to move, it should not be very surprising that, for example, +ve lightning, which is generally 6-10 times greater than -ve lightning, dishes out up to 300KA at 1GV producing up to 300GJ for close to a second.

You may go to yahoo and type in 'earth's electrical charge'. Go through the page looking for words highlighted in blue. Someone there agrees with me.

Thanks for your feedback. I had to do a little searching around in order to respond.

Ecarlo

Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - Scapolie, new member.

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1058
Good Answers: 8
#6
In reply to #3

Re: Energy

02/05/2008 11:47 AM

Hi Guest.

I am afraid that you wrong in stating that the Earth is made up mostly of iron?

Here are the actual elements and their weight percentage which make up the world:

Oxygen = 50%

Silicon = 26%

Aluminium = 7%

Iron = 4%

Calcium = 3%

Sodium = 2.5%

Potassium = 2.5%

Magnesium = 2%

Hydrogen = 1%

All the other elements combined only add up to 2%

Spencer.

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#7
In reply to #6

Re: Energy

02/05/2008 12:19 PM

Don't rely on one source and check your source carefully. Make sure you are not looking at just the inner core, core, mantle, crust or atmosphere individually. Find the percentages of the elements comprising the earth holistically. Make full use of the internet.

Good luck with that.

Thanks for your response.

Ecarlo

Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - Scapolie, new member.

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1058
Good Answers: 8
#8
In reply to #7

Re: Energy

02/05/2008 2:13 PM

Hi Ecarlo.

I don't need to use the internet to check my figures, I use this table every day as a geologist/mineralogist. The scale that I use is entitled; "Compostion of Earth, Sea and Sky by weight", this is given in weight percents!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Of course this includes everything from the inner core to the boundry of our outer atmosphere. The inner core is solid Iron plus about 3% Nickel, the outer core is Iron in a very plastic habit, The mantle which is divided in two is a very plastic Fe Mg silicate that also contains the heavier elements, The crust which is not very thick ( 80-90km on the continents, to 2-5km at its thinest on the sea floor), consists mainly of the silicates.

The amount of Iron ores in/on the crust is minute indeed, and the core is also a very small sphere!

Spencer.

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4448
Good Answers: 143
#2

Re: Energy

02/04/2008 12:03 PM

Venus and a good pair of jumper cables.

__________________
"Well, I've wrestled with reality for 35 years, Doctor, and I'm happy to state I finally won out over it." Elwood P. Dowd
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Knoxville, Tn
Posts: 141
Good Answers: 3
#4

Re: Energy

02/04/2008 11:03 PM

A large (many feet of wire) ungrounded antenna will produce some "angry" blue discharges on a continual basis.

__________________
Analogies are like something else.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1753
Good Answers: 59
#5

Re: Energy

02/05/2008 6:34 AM

I would be happier, if you would refine the question. Voltage is potential. Current is flow. Potential without flow is not work, and vica versa. Where would the power delivery come from?

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 8 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (2); Electroman (1); leveles (1); palinurus (1); Scapolie (2); TVP45 (1)

Previous in Forum: Copper Winding Weight in 13.5 Megawatt Turbine   Next in Forum: Question On MCCB Tripping

Advertisement