Previous in Forum: Fuel Saver (diesel only)   Next in Forum: Which Has a Better Future?
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Associate
Engineering Fields - Energy Engineering - New Member India - Member - Jack of all trades

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: India
Posts: 43
Good Answers: 2

Biosafety Level-3 facility- Prefab Vs Conventional Construction

02/20/2008 5:54 AM

Hi,

Which is a better choice for BSL-3 facility, prefab modular labs or conventional construction.

Kamal

__________________
It takes considerable knowledge just to reaIise your own extent of ignorance.
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Anonymous Poster
#1

Re: Biosafety Level-3 facility- Prefab Vs Conventional Construction

02/22/2008 11:23 AM

Whichever is cheaper...

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Biosafety Level-3 facility- Prefab Vs Conventional Construction

02/24/2008 10:47 PM

Well.. thats a vague answer to my query.

I think you first need to know what BSL-3 is all about and then only try to answer such query. This needs in-depth knowledge of bio-hazards and specific pros & cons of prefab and conventional facility.

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#3

Re: Biosafety Level-3 facility- Prefab Vs Conventional Construction

03/11/2008 9:03 AM

Modular BSL 3 labs are increasingly a viable option largely because they can be custom designed, fabricated, delivered and commissioned often in less time than a conventional bricks and mortar constructed building without compromising capabilities or safety. jmclaurin@germfree.com

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 3 comments

Previous in Forum: Fuel Saver (diesel only)   Next in Forum: Which Has a Better Future?

Advertisement