Previous in Forum: Horsepower from Pressured Water Supply   Next in Forum: The "Science" of Superman
Close
Close
Close
8 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Guru
Engineering Fields - Aerospace Engineering - Retired South Africa - Member - The Rainbow-nation Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Relativity & Cosmology Popular Science - Cosmology - The Big Picture!

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Posts: 3804
Good Answers: 69

Airships for Astronomy

06/24/2006 11:59 AM

When it comes to astronomy, large telescopes rule. But if you can get your instrument into space, you bypass the atmosphere that blurs sensitive data. Unfortunately, the cost of launching observatories into space is beyond the budget of most researchers. One possible strategy is to install powerful observatories instruments onto high altitude airships, which can float above most of obscuring atmosphere. The view from the high atmosphere is almost as good as actually being in orbit, and it can be had for a fraction of the price of flying a telescope into orbit. (Universe Today)

__________________
"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge." -- Kahlil Gibran
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Power-User

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 173
Good Answers: 3
#1

Blimp power and the astro-turff

06/25/2006 7:59 AM

This sounds all grand to be using a high altitude vessal for an observatory into the astro plane. However, the expense would be enormous as well, when comparing to all other types of means for the sciences. It would have been a more keen idea for the world science groups involved in astro-physics to ralley the funds to keep the Hubal program in top working order. This was by far our best observatory while the fun lasted. But of coarse, a blimp would only be a fraction of the expenses required to launch another platform into the astro-abys. Your main concern would be the prevailing winds at such an emormous altitude, since our planet is rotating in ~22K mph in its' orbital plain. Its' sixs' no matter how you look at it.

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Aerospace Engineering - Retired South Africa - Member - The Rainbow-nation Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Relativity & Cosmology Popular Science - Cosmology - The Big Picture!

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Posts: 3804
Good Answers: 69
#2
In reply to #1

Re:Blimp power and the astro-turff

06/25/2006 8:52 AM

Our planet's surface velocity due to rotation is surely not ~22K mph - it's just over 1000 mph. In any case, the question is, does it matter if the wind pushes the airship off it's 'place'? After all, Hubble is rushing around the Earth at ~28k mph and it does not seem to bother the astronomers! I think the engines would just be there to orientate the airship for observation.

__________________
"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge." -- Kahlil Gibran
Register to Reply
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Engineering Fields - Transportation Engineering - New Member Popular Science - Evolution - New Member Technical Fields - Procurement - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Engineering Fields - Architectural Engineering - New Member Technical Fields - Marketing/Advertising - New Member Engineering Fields - Food Process Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mariposa Ca
Posts: 5800
Good Answers: 114
#3
In reply to #2

Re:Blimp power and the astro-turff

06/25/2006 12:35 PM

Would the stability be there, w/a blimp? The forces are constant, for the Hubble.

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Aerospace Engineering - Retired South Africa - Member - The Rainbow-nation Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Relativity & Cosmology Popular Science - Cosmology - The Big Picture!

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Posts: 3804
Good Answers: 69
#5
In reply to #3

Re:Blimp power and the astro-turff

06/26/2006 5:15 AM

It's no problem stabilizing a payload, I think. Even astro-referencing can be used if you are high enough up.

__________________
"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge." -- Kahlil Gibran
Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#7
In reply to #1

Re:Blimp power and the astro-turff

06/26/2006 2:46 PM

amazing stuff! What you've thought of is truly quiet amazing, a Blimp need not only be the means of placing a high altitude observatory. There are other ways too. With the kind of stablization systems that exist, it would be easy to get any order of refferencing that you require. as Quoted by many already it all depends on how inclined you really are.

Register to Reply
The Engineer
Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Physics... United States - Member - NY Popular Science - Genetics - Organic Chemistry... Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Ingeniería en Español - Nuevo Miembro - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 5060
Good Answers: 129
#4

What about Adaptive Optics

06/25/2006 7:17 PM

Adaptive Optics have come a long way and the technology is improving every day.

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Aerospace Engineering - Retired South Africa - Member - The Rainbow-nation Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Relativity & Cosmology Popular Science - Cosmology - The Big Picture!

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Posts: 3804
Good Answers: 69
#6
In reply to #4

Re:What about Adaptive Optics

06/26/2006 5:19 AM

Adaptive optics works wonders at most frequencies, but there are quite a few bands that the atmosphere blocks out. For them space or at least "very high" is the only option.

__________________
"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge." -- Kahlil Gibran
Register to Reply
Power-User
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 261
#8

Blimp Telescopes

06/27/2006 4:50 PM

High altitude ballons have been used for cosmic ray and U.V. instruments,
but for optical observation?
Apart from the stability problem, the physics of blimp design
place the gasbag above the payload.
Inconvenient, don't ya know.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 8 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); Bayes (1); Garthh (1); Jorrie (3); LordMaximo (1); Pragmatist (1)

Previous in Forum: Horsepower from Pressured Water Supply   Next in Forum: The "Science" of Superman

Advertisement