Previous in Forum: Sherlock Holmes and the Missing Energy   Next in Forum: Britain's Biometric ID Cards: NO2ID in 2008
Close
Close
Close
2 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
The Feature Creep

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 990

Fortune says Jack Welch is Wrong

07/11/2006 11:00 AM

The cover story of next months Fortune magazine is about how Jack Welch's rules no longer apply to the new business world. The ex-CEO of GE is (or should I say was) one of the leading thinkers in how businesses should be run. Fortune is saying that his way no longer works in the real world.
The 7 new ways to run business.
Looks like I don't have to read his book anymore.

__________________
"The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet." -William Gibson
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - Organizer Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2969
Good Answers: 33
#1

Times May Change

07/11/2006 2:33 PM

Ken Lay once wrote a book for Enron employees about business ethics. Times may change, but character still trumps charisma at the end of the day.

Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - HAM Radio - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri USA
Posts: 1929
Good Answers: 9
#2

New Rules?

07/12/2006 3:02 PM

FORTUNE magazine says there are "new" rules for running a business. "In Search of Excellence" (ISE) by Peters and Waterman, a book which looked at the practices of management in fast-growing, successful companies, came out in 1982, almost 25 years ago!

Here are the main principles in ISE (according to Wikipedia):

1. A bias for action, active decision making - 'getting on with it'.
2. Close to the customer - learning from the people served by the business.
3. Autonomy and entrepreneurship - fostering innovation and nurturing 'champions'.
4. Productivity through people - treating rank and file employees as a source of quality.
5. Hands-on, value-driven - management philosophy that guides everyday practice - management showing its commitment.
6. Stick to the knitting - stay with the business that you know.
7. Simple form, lean staff - some of the best companies have minimal HQ staff.
8. Simultaneous loose-tight properties - autonomy in shop-floor activities plus centralised values.

The "new" rules and the main points in "Excellence" are surprisingly similar. Just for fun, let's compare:

"The new rules"

1: Old rule: Big dogs own the street.
New rule: Agile is best; being big can bite you.
ISE: Simple form, lean staff - some of the best companies have minimal HQ staff.

2: Old rule: Be No. 1 or No. 2 in your market.
New rule: Find a niche, create something new.
ISE: Autonomy and entrepreneurship - fostering innovation and nurturing 'champions'

3: Old rule: Shareholders rule.
New rule: The customer is king.
ISE: Close to the customer - learning from the people served by the business.

4: Old rule: Be lean and mean.
New rule: Look out, not in.
ISE: Simultaneous loose-tight properties - autonomy in shop-floor activities plus centralised values
(This one doesn't quite match up, but it and #6 above were leftover)

5: Old rule: Rank your players; go with the A's.
New rule: Hire passionate people.
ISE: Productivity through people - treating rank and file employees as a source of quality

6: Old rule: Hire a charismatic CEO
New rule: Hire a courageous CEO.
ISE: A bias for action, active decision making - 'getting on with it'.

7: Old rule: Admire my might.
New rule: Admire my soul.
ISE: Hands-on, value-driven - management philosophy that guides everyday practice - management showing its commitment.

These do not match up exactly, but there is a lot of overlap as well. I think that ISE did a good job of recognizing where growth was coming in the economy and what created it.

Maximizing shareholder value does not necessarily lead to growth, for the company or the econmy. In the film "Other People's Money", Danny DeVito plays a Wall Street shark whose specialty was taking over companies by buying a minor interest, enough to get on the Board of Directors, then winning a proxy fight for control on the platform of liquidating the company, selling off its assets, all in the name of "maximizing shareholder value".

The film had a happy ending, for the targeted company. It moved into newer technology, fighting off DeVito and implementing or continuing many of the ideas in ISE. When did the movie come out? 1991, but it was an off-Broadway play before that.

Unfortunately for our economy, more of the CEO's (even in smaller businesses who should have known better) listened to Jack Welch, instead of Tom Peters. Unfortunately for me, I worked for many of the companies helmed by CEO's who believed in Welch's ideas, while giving lip-service to Peters, resulting in "downsizing" and layoffs, hitting me personally several times during that era.

__________________
"What, me worry?" Alfred E. Neuman
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 2 comments

Previous in Forum: Sherlock Holmes and the Missing Energy   Next in Forum: Britain's Biometric ID Cards: NO2ID in 2008

Advertisement