Giuseppe Frau writes:
Hi everyone,
I am trying to determine the best Low Pass filter choice for accelerometer signal conditioners and I went through specs and documents of National Instruments, PCB Piezotronics, Endevco, Wilcoxon, Iotech.
The specifications of National Instruments SCXI-1531 state that their Low Pass Filter is a Programmable 4-pole Bessel filter. Most of the signal conditioners for IEPE accelerometers like Iotech WBK4 or Wilcoxon PR710 or Endevco 136 or Wilcoxon IT111 adopt instead Butterworth filters with filter order >=4.
In terms of noise, does the choice of a Bessel instead of Butterworth filter represent a disadvantage?
A Bessel filter has a very gradual initial falloff, while a Butterworth has a faster initial falloff that would provide more attenuation close to the cut frequency.
On the other hand, the phase linearity of a Bessel filter implies that the input waveform is phase shifted an amount proportional to frequency. In other words, the output is again the input signal but with higher frequency components removed by the filter.
But does the Bessel filter choice have to do with possible overshoots?
I wonder whether an accelerometer signal conditioner with higher order Butterworth filter would offer more attenuation but higher risks of overshoot and ringing and then a worst output waveform.
Am I missing some important considerations in this comparison?
Are there dynamic considerations that should be done?
What would be the best choice for a signal conditioner that should be used for any IEPE accelerometer sensor working in frequency ranges up to 20kHz?
Thank you in advance for your help.