Previous in Forum: Electric Car Speed Record   Next in Forum: Distance electrical engineering training
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Anonymous Poster

Bessel versus Butterworth filter

05/05/2005 12:32 PM

Giuseppe Frau writes:
Hi everyone, I am trying to determine the best Low Pass filter choice for accelerometer signal conditioners and I went through specs and documents of National Instruments, PCB Piezotronics, Endevco, Wilcoxon, Iotech. The specifications of National Instruments SCXI-1531 state that their Low Pass Filter is a Programmable 4-pole Bessel filter. Most of the signal conditioners for IEPE accelerometers like Iotech WBK4 or Wilcoxon PR710 or Endevco 136 or Wilcoxon IT111 adopt instead Butterworth filters with filter order >=4. In terms of noise, does the choice of a Bessel instead of Butterworth filter represent a disadvantage? A Bessel filter has a very gradual initial falloff, while a Butterworth has a faster initial falloff that would provide more attenuation close to the cut frequency. On the other hand, the phase linearity of a Bessel filter implies that the input waveform is phase shifted an amount proportional to frequency. In other words, the output is again the input signal but with higher frequency components removed by the filter. But does the Bessel filter choice have to do with possible overshoots? I wonder whether an accelerometer signal conditioner with higher order Butterworth filter would offer more attenuation but higher risks of overshoot and ringing and then a worst output waveform. Am I missing some important considerations in this comparison? Are there dynamic considerations that should be done? What would be the best choice for a signal conditioner that should be used for any IEPE accelerometer sensor working in frequency ranges up to 20kHz? Thank you in advance for your help.

Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 214
Good Answers: 3
#1

Filter Choice

05/05/2005 4:22 PM

Giuseppe, Your considerations respect to overshoot and attenuation for the two filters are correct. In my opinion, for an accelerometer filter you must consider the posibility of overshoots that will distort the shape of the waveform (or the pulse). A Butterworth filter, because the phase shift response is not linear (not proportional to the frequency), will produce different time delays when trying to filter pulses in particular. This, as you know, will produce overshoots in the output. (If you are trying to filter signals where all frequencies are at the same gain (not pulses), then the Butterweorth is excellent). A Bessel filter is linear in its phase response (phase shift is linearly proportional to the frequency aat every point). This fact produces no overshoot, and the output signal will not have any distortion at all. The Bessel, as you indicate, has a "tough" behavior (to say the least) close to the critical frequency. The Bessel gives you less attenuation at fc than a similar Butterworth filter (with the same number of poles). You can, however, you can design your Bessel filter with a little higher cut-off frequcny (not too much, though). In the case of accelerometers, I consider overshoot avoidance more important than attenuation close to fc. Hope this second opinion will strengthen your ideas. Abe

Reply
Participant

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2
#2
In reply to #1

Re:Filter Choice

05/05/2005 7:41 PM

Abe, Thank you for your answer. It is indeed very helpful. About the possibility of designing the Bessel filter with a little higher cut-off frequency, such a move would "make up" for the less attenuation close to the original fc. But the risk is to set the new cut frequency a bit "too" high and introduce undesired attenuation on the signal. I believe this is what you meant by saying "not too much, though". On the bottom of your answer, you consider overshoot avoidance versus attenuation in the case of accelerometers. May I ask you what type of professional experience (design, applications, etc.) you gathered with accelerometers? Again, thank you for all your comments and suggestions. Giuseppe

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 214
Good Answers: 3
#3
In reply to #2

Re:Filter Choice

05/07/2005 11:13 AM

Giuseppe, I am an electrical engineer (more in the electronics side) that also teaches at a local Community College. I teach Electronics (Digital and Analog) and (among others) a course in Electromechanical Systems where we give special emphasis to the design of signal conditioning systems for sensors and data acquisition. Eventhough I can assure you that I am not an expert in accelerometers, I do teach in this course a chapter in general accelerometers theory and signal conditioning.

Reply
Reply to Forum Thread 3 comments

Previous in Forum: Electric Car Speed Record   Next in Forum: Distance electrical engineering training

Advertisement