Previous in Forum: pressure vessel design procedure   Next in Forum: Derating-Crane
Close
Close
Close
2 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1

33 mm plate in tanks

05/26/2008 6:27 AM

my Q will be in pipe shell course 1st level in the tank .. in our company, we request size of 33 mm plates as a requirement .. the contractor gave us a 37 mm .. the Q is what is the difference and what it will effect and how the calculation will be to be sure that we R in safe ??

thanx

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Anonymous Poster
#1

Re: 33 mm plate in tanks

05/27/2008 2:33 AM

After Design , during Fibraction .. if the contractor dosen't find the design thickness in Market, the contractor can avail plates slightly above the design thickness to avoid excess weight.

Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 46
Good Answers: 3
#2

Re: 33 mm plate in tanks

05/27/2008 10:07 AM

This is assuming you are talking about the first shell course. Typically, I trust the tank/vessel fabricator. The additional thickness could be a result of several factors. Minimal wall thickness required by design. Corrosion allowance required. Nominal loss during polishing activities (If you are at minimum after polishing and you have repair work in the future, you will have to "over-lay" so as not to polish beyond minimal wall thickness.) Loss during head forming at the knuckle area. (I realize you are not ref heads, but if they did a bulk matl buy-out, they would by like matl) Market availability is another factor. Also, maybe they had the material in stock from a previously canceled project. Weld joint efficiency could be another reason. At times a fabricator will increase material thickness to affect overall weld joint efficiency and reduce potential NDT requirements/costs in the field. My concern would be, depending on amount of material, the additional weight on foundation, legs, skirt etc. but even so, we are not talking significant amounts.

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Register to Reply 2 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!

Previous in Forum: pressure vessel design procedure   Next in Forum: Derating-Crane

Advertisement