Previous in Forum: Test gear   Next in Forum: watchdog timer
Close
Close
Close
6 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Power-User
Ireland - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Energy Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 197
Good Answers: 17

Energy to send an email

08/06/2008 10:52 PM

Been wondering how much electrical energy is expended sending an e-mail? I know this is length of string question, but obviously we consider PC power consumption at each end. However how to apportion router & switch power consumption? Don't forget aircon in the data centres also.

__________________
I love deadlines; I love the whooshing sound they make as they pass by. - Douglas Adams
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
5
Guru
New Zealand - Member - Interested in everything- see my Profile please APIX Pilot Plant Design Project - Member - Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - Member Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - Member Hobbies - Musician - Autoharp and Harmonica Hobbies - Hunting - Member Hobbies - Fishing - Member

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Christchurch, (The Garden City), South Island, New Zealand
Posts: 4395
Good Answers: 230
#1

Re: Energy to send an email

08/06/2008 11:09 PM

Hello BabyGuinness

It is not actually possible to easily calculate, since Internet traffic is transmitted in small packets of data.

Those packets which travel from Source A to Destination B, may travel via several paths, during the separate packets of a single email message.

The transmission of every packet requires "electronic handshakes" to/from and from/to - both ways for each packet, and if there is a 'packet problem', that packet is re-sent until correct reception is acknowledged.

The data transfer on the Internet is far more complex a system than most people realise, because of all the checking, handshaking, acknowledgement, splitting into packets, reassembly of packets into the correct order, and more.

From your location in Wellington, an Email to the US or Europe, may pass through 15 to 18 Internet Servers alone, not to mention the Microwave relay stations, Satellites, Undersea cable boosters and the like.

The actual figure could be calculated, providing each packet was specially "tagged" and all paths used were allowed for, plus relay stations and the PC's each end, plus the losses in the Power networks before each installation, and the generating and transmission efficiencies.

Then you need to add in all the energy requirments and costs of making and installing all the infrastructure.

However, I do believe that even with all the energy consumed, it would be more energy-efficient than sending an airmail letter.

Electronic or light pulses are cheaper to send, energy-wise, than a real-time package or letter.

Kind Regards....

__________________
"The number of inventions increases faster than the need for them at the time" - SparkY
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 5)
Member

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 7
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Energy to send an email

08/08/2008 1:28 AM

thanks , good answer !!!

Register to Reply
Guru
United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Gone to Alabama with my banjo on my knee...
Posts: 5595
Good Answers: 20
#5
In reply to #1

Re: Energy to send an email

08/08/2008 10:15 AM

Concur yours is a GA, Sparky, and so voted. How much of the infrastructure that makes it possible does one apportion? Can we say that the power plant was amortized already because it was built primarily for other purposes such as light and heat, or should we figure in $0.0000002 per email due to the need for electricity to send/receive? There are some parallels with airmail that don't really work. Aircraft were developed in their early days largely for transporting mail, so it seems a more applicable portion of the cost of air cargo and passenger travel was borne by airmail. Power plants, transmission lines, even the computers themselves, had development reasons other than email to bear out the costs of development. I know there's a line to be drawn intuitively, but I know not where it should be sketched in.

__________________
Veni, vidi, video - I came, I saw, I got it on film.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User
United Kingdom - Member - Hobbies - HAM Radio - G7TSP Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering -

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: South Coast United Kingdom
Posts: 124
Good Answers: 1
#3

Re: Energy to send an email

08/08/2008 9:00 AM

About 1.21GW is you consider the amount of energy consumed to get technology to where it is today and make is possible...

As you say, how long is a piece of string?

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#4

Re: Energy to send an email

08/08/2008 9:50 AM

Nice Doc Brown reference...LOL

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#6

Re: Energy to send an email

08/08/2008 12:52 PM

idiota..

Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Register to Reply 6 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (2); EnviroMan (1); Lemmy70 (1); sivaprasad (1); Sparkstation (1)

Previous in Forum: Test gear   Next in Forum: watchdog timer

Advertisement