Previous in Forum: Mating Thread for Grease Fitting with DIN 714121 Threads   Next in Forum: Turbine Velocity
Close
Close
Close
32 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Active Contributor

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Farnham, England
Posts: 15

Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/10/2008 12:28 PM

I need to be able to independantly dynamically balance organ blower impellers. Needless to say the cost of a new hard bearing machine is way out of reach for a small business in such a specialised low turnover area. I have tried to research all the possible alternatives but have only come up with the idea of making the hardware, i.e. a hard bearing horizontal rig, and using it in conjunction with an off the shelf portable balancing unit. Needless to say the requirements for organ blowers are not really catered for anyway in the commercially built complete machines and its not possible to use a portable machine on an assembled blower as there is restricted access to the impellers. Has anyone any ideas on this? I'd be most grateful for any advice, tips or recommendations.

Best wishes James

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Not a New Member Hobbies - Musician - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Reading, Berkshire, UK. Going under cover.
Posts: 9684
Good Answers: 468
#1

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/10/2008 9:46 PM

Hi, James,

That's certainly a niche market you've got. Sorry I can't help (haven't got the foggiest about balancing gear) - but I hope someone here can.

Good luck,

John

__________________
"Love justice, you who rule the world" - Dante Alighieri
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Piney Flats, Tennessee
Posts: 1740
Good Answers: 23
#2

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/10/2008 11:47 PM

All over the USA we have used equipment dealers some don't have an online presence. Businesses like motor re builders increase and shrink with the economy over here. When people have extra money they blow it on cars.

__________________
If you never do anything you never have problems.
Register to Reply
2
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: I'm outa here
Posts: 1924
Good Answers: 196
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/11/2008 1:05 AM

These little horizontal Hoffman balancers are very nice. They are also expensive. The company I was working for as a mechanical engineer in 1976 paid the equivalent of 6 months of my salary for one. I used it on a project for balancing the rotors of a small high speed motor about 5 inches between the bearings. It was a well enough engineered system that I had no trouble training the techs in the motor assembly shop how to use it and take care of it for production use.

You could probably build your own as long as you have a clear understanding of how a 2 plane balancer works. The real challenge is going to be if you try to build your own electronics.

You need two bearing mounts that are flexible (flexures) to hang the rotor on yet stiff enough that the 1st critical speed of the rotor is above the speed your balancer motor will turn at (perhaps a few hundred rpm, much slower than the operating speed of the blower.) Each bearing mount will have a transducer with an analog output (voltage) on it that measures displacement, velocity or acceleration(preferred). These transducers pick up the summation of centrifugal forces of the rotor at speed and output a more or less sinusoidal signal proportional to the unbalance force and the square of the speed. Display them on a two channel scope and the extent to which they are out of phase and unequal is a measure of unbalance. Calibration is easy with a perfectly balanced machined test rotor, which you will need for the cut and try process of getting the right combination of constants in the flexures, transducers and drive mechanism for the balancer.

The one other thing you'll need is a strobe timed off the rotating mechanism somewhere. Make one from an old engine timing light; but make sure the high voltage in the light circuit can't find its way back into any of the delicate electronic components like the scope. This strobe flashes once each revolution to mark your zero point. All you need is to feed this strobe trigger signal into the scope to see the angle relation to zero of the force peaks. this is where you'll remove material to improve balance (or add material 180 degrees away). Use a simple proportion calculation to determine how to add or remove material in planes other than those of the flexures.

This may make the balancer manufacturer's sales rep cringe but this is essentially how it's done. Back in the 1940's and 50's Pappy Hough, a legendary circle track race car mechanic had a converted engine lathe in his shop in Gasoline Alley on 19th avenue in Paterson, NJ. His flexures were on modified lathe steady rests with dial indicators on them. IIRC he didn't even have a strobe on it. He used it to balance crankshafts for the racers and drive shafts for the hot rodders. I think he quit doing crankshafts when his neighbor in the Alley, Dick Simoneck, bought a real balancing machine (I'm not sure but I think it may have been a Gisholt).

Ed Weldon, Los Gatos, CA

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4484
Good Answers: 246
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/11/2008 1:46 AM

That's certainly an excellent answer if ever there was one.

__________________
There is more to life than just eating mice.
Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Farnham, England
Posts: 15
#8
In reply to #3

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/11/2008 6:27 PM

Thanks for this. I have an old manual form a Schenk H5 machine and the principals seem pretty straight forward. However the higher the degree of accuracy the more components clearly need to be refined. Their accelerometers are basically large permanent magnet devices with fixed coils. As the magnet moves with vibration the coils are cut by the moving lines of the magnetic field and hence a small voltage is induced. This is then amplified and filtered, depending on the degree of sensitivity required, and interfaced with an input from a photo tachometer recording the rotor position. Their old display units used a light beam bounced off three mirrors two of which were controlled by field coils at 90 Degrees and projected on to a fixed graticule which effectively gave a display of position and degree of imbalance. Needless to say it sounds simple but only because I hugely over simplify. Unfortunately this is the sort of thing I need and even second hand it costs the earth to someone running a small business. However I'm determined to acquire this facility and hence why I'm relying on the input of more experienced engineers in this field. I need both direction and practical input if I am to embark on building such a set up.

Best wishes James

Register to Reply
2
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Germany 49° 26' N, 7° 46' O
Posts: 1950
Good Answers: 109
#5

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/11/2008 3:00 AM

Hi,

first to decide: one plane or two-plane balancing.

Disc like equipment (grinding discs for example) do need only one-plane balancing if mounted with very good quality regarding the orientation of the plane to the axis. Any tilt cannot be balanced by one-plane balancing.

If one plane balancing is sufficient then you can use the method of the old watchmakers: fit a good and tightly fitting axis of extremely good roundness and smoothness to your object and let it roll on two straight and parallel rails (polished hard material, ruby in watchmaking alumina recommended). If it is not rolling in any position it is balanced with good quality.

Two plane balancing is needed in elongated rotors or tilted flat rotors.

This needs the method finely described in post 3. Cost to buy is above 10,000$

Cost to make is dependent on the measurement you get. If using the soft spring suspension (turning your rotor with speed above (min 1.5x) the resonant frequency of the suspended mass in these springs) you can use either displacement or velocity sensors.

If you are using stiffer suspension springs (easier) and operate below resonance it is more recommended to use velocity- or acceleration- sensors.

Cheapest in sensors is any loudspeaker used as a generator: voltage is proportional to speed, but voltage is very low so a small transformer (1:100 to 1:1000) should be used or a high gain amplifier.

What is missing in description of post 3 is the filtering that is removing unwanted noise from motors and environment. This is normally done as as a multiplication of the measured (and amplified) signal with a synthetic sine and cosine of exactly the rotation frequency (no phase jitter or delay allowed!). If your requirements are not too stringent I would try without this and do filtering with an L-C oscillator-filter. I expect you use only one type of motor, speed given by frequency.?

Have success.

I got good and used piezo-accelerometers at 5% original cost from ebay.

RHABE

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Active Contributor

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Farnham, England
Posts: 15
#7
In reply to #5

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/11/2008 6:02 PM

You obviously have an extremely good handle on the necessary means of achieving success. I must admit that the technical requirements, more especially the electronic side of things, is beyond my knowledge. I know I require two plane as some of the blowers I deal with have multiple impellers on a single shaft and even the small blowers with rotor mounted impellers tend to develope a couple imbalance which requires two plane correction. The real question is can such a system of accelerometers, photo tachometer, amplifier and filters be built as a one off by someone with good mechanical skills but no direct electronic back ground? Is sufficient information available to support such a project? The only other alternative is the expediant of a portable system integrated with a fixed hard bearing set up. This alternative still means a reasonable capital investment. My researches so far would suggest £5000.00 which is not insignificant.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Germany 49° 26' N, 7° 46' O
Posts: 1950
Good Answers: 109
#12
In reply to #7

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/12/2008 6:32 PM

Hi jamescz121,

what quality of balancing do you need:

coarse (easily seen vibration and felt by hand if housing is touched)

(hand-tools, motor-bikes, bad cars)

fine: not to be seen but felt by very feeble touching with fingertips or finger-nails (near 1µm)

precision grinding, best motor cars, precision machine tools,

very fine: not resolvable by human feeling (flywheels)

ultrafine: (gyros)

This will decide how much amplifying and noise immunity you will need. I assume you have an asynchronous motor?

So your balancing has to be immune to large vibrations caused by the motor, or the motors balanced separately? Or the coupling is not transmitting motor vibrations?

If you can answer these questions and requirements are not too stringent I can suggest to you an experimental setup that will be below 2000$, likely near 500$.

(Not counting your time nor your gain in experience.)

We once had to do this for a very high quality system used in scanning photos for manipulation and then printing these dot-wise on films. Scanners and printers need incredibly good balancing. This was not an easy experience but later we sold 10 such systems to other users.

RHABE

Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Farnham, England
Posts: 15
#19
In reply to #12

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/15/2008 6:25 AM

Sorry for the lack of response terribly pushed at work. The industry standard is G6.5 but ideally I would like G3. The thing is the more vibration the more noise tends to get generated especially once the bearings become worn. All the best blowers have sleeve bearings so life expectancy is very good but I often come across blowers where either the front bearing has been knocked out by vibration or the rear and I understand this is due to original balancing having been carried out single plane using the impeller only rather than balancing two plane and taking into account any couple. I really would be most grateful for any help you can offer.

Best wishes

James

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Capital City, Cow Hampshire, USA
Posts: 476
Good Answers: 3
#20
In reply to #19

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/15/2008 6:50 AM

Can you supply a photo of a typical blower assembly?

__________________
If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you've always had!
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Germany 49° 26' N, 7° 46' O
Posts: 1950
Good Answers: 109
#24
In reply to #19

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/16/2008 6:10 AM

Hi,

is your G6.5 in g.cm or g.mm?

RHABE

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Capital City, Cow Hampshire, USA
Posts: 476
Good Answers: 3
#26
In reply to #24

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/16/2008 6:19 AM
__________________
If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you've always had!
Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Farnham, England
Posts: 15
#28
In reply to #24

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/17/2008 3:59 PM

I am fairly certain, a contradiction in terms I know, that this is gram.mm.

James

Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 25
#6

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/11/2008 6:10 AM

Hi, I don't know the geometry of an Organ Blower, and I suspect it may be large diam, low-speed, but if it happens to be the opposite, then there is a company in the UK which makes balancing machines for Automotive Turbo-charger wheels, which might be worth taking a look at.

Company is TURBO-TECNICS, at Brackmills, Northampton, UK - find it on Google

Good Hunting!

Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Farnham, England
Posts: 15
#9
In reply to #6

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/11/2008 6:40 PM

Needless to say the geometry is usually large diameter overhung impeller say 12 to 24 inches in diameter with single impeller blowers or upto five large diameter impellers on a single shaft each around 36 inches in diameter. Generally operating speeds are 1500 with large units sometimes 3000 with the smallest blowers. However thanks for the advice I will have a look at turbo-tecnics.

Thanks James

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: I'm outa here
Posts: 1924
Good Answers: 196
#10
In reply to #9

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/11/2008 10:04 PM

James --

Let's proceed slowly here. If you were to go to a balancing machine producer with a serious intention to buy a product from them the first thing they would want to see is a detailed description of the balancing problem you are trying to solve since they are in the business of engineering specialized balancing equipment as well as "off the shelf" machines.

In spite of that here you are asking for advice and have gotten the attention of several experienced engineers (and at a pretty fair price, I might add) yet you have told us little of the details of your application. In addition you have given us very little information on your ability to create and fabricate specialized tools for your business except that you are probably not ready to make a do-it-yourself project out of building an analog electronic circuit that includes things like op amps and filters (neither am I; maybe RHABE is? As a mechanical engineer I know it is one thing to talk about filters; it's another thing entirely to know how to design them, poles and zeros being largely a mystery to me).

So tell us a bit more about the size and weight of these impellers, what kinds of shafts they are mounted on, how they are supported in the machines you are dealing with, etc. How bad is the balance problem you are dealing with? Is there any way to lead us to illustrations or best, cross-sectional drawings of these machines? Why the original manufacturers of these large fans may not have done the impeller balancing well enough to suit your customers or yourself?

Ed Weldon, Los Gatos, CA, USA

Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Farnham, England
Posts: 15
#21
In reply to #10

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/15/2008 7:15 AM

Ok, most organ blowers consist of an impeller direct driven from a motor i.e. mounted on the motor shaft. In the very smallest of cases the impellers are around 300mm(12") in diameter the largest 900mm(36") diameter. They are constructed from two plates with radial blades between and a central hub. The average thickness of an impeller, I say average because some can be tappered in section from the outside to the centre, is from 25mm(1") to 75mm(3") depending on diameter. The relative thickness of impellers means that the majority have been single plane balanced in production most probably using a mandrel and many of the older machines are likely to only be statically balanced. With smaller units the impellers are often run on two pole motors(approx. 3000 RPM).Larger single impellers are always run on four pole motors(approx. 1500 RPM). With single units weight can be anything from 2 to 10 Kg. 4.4 to 22 Lbs. Bearing in mind that I restore old blowers, as part of that process, I have these types of impellers two plane balanced as an assembly with their respective rotors. At the more major end of the blower market I deal with multi stage blowers where upto five large impellers are mounted on a single shaft which is close coupled to a motor. The main difference here is the weight, upto 70Kg, again these units are balanced two plane as an assembly.

Needless to say I am involved both as an organ builder an engineer in the practical solution of problems. I work in a specialist field where the potential for profit is small but the drive for perfection is great. Unfortunately there is always a wall where, without capital investment, no improvement can be made and this area is just such a wall for me. Previously I have conquered the matter of motor rewinding and rebuilding due to the inconvenience of using outside contractors in this area and the fact that I deal with motors long since obsolete. Also few rewinders are prepared to do basket windings on short throw unequal pole motors as it takes time to achieve neatly. What I'm trying to say is I'm not afraid to put in the work and research on a project like this but I know my limitations and I know in this case without practical input from experienced engineers with the specialist knowledge I'm probably sunk.

So any input is gratefully received and very much appreciated.

Best wishes

James

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Capital City, Cow Hampshire, USA
Posts: 476
Good Answers: 3
#23
In reply to #21

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/15/2008 6:50 PM

James,

A few more questions: After balancing, how is the rotor attached to the motor?

What exactly is a 're-build'? are you building new rotors, fitting old to new motors, or, constructing completly new air sources (design irrelevant; function matters)?

__________________
If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you've always had!
Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Farnham, England
Posts: 15
#29
In reply to #23

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/17/2008 4:09 PM

I use the term rebuild in the same sense as one might rebuild an engine. As far as is practical the machine is returned to as new condition with the exception of improving the quality of balancing. We take blowers that have burned out motors, decayed casings, broken impellers and worn out bearings or any combination of factors. Re-manufacture bearings and damaged components, rewind motors, often adapt components to take modern equivalent bearings etc etc. All castings, metal fabrications etc in serviceable order are stripped to bare metal, primed and painted with a finishing coat of abrasive resistant lacquer. I wish I could manage to post some photos as one particular rebuild of a 1913 tandem blower started with little more than a broken heap of rusty cast iron and bits of sheet steel. Most blowers we deal with are 50+ years old built in the days when obsolescence was a dirty word our aim is always to ensure that once rebuilt a blower can be expected to deliver the same trouble free life span before requiring any further work.

Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Farnham, England
Posts: 15
#30
In reply to #23

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/17/2008 4:11 PM

Oh yes and impellers are normally attached by a hub on the impeller, usually refered to as a top hat. This may be keyed to the shaft but is often retained with grub screws or bolts pinching into recesses in the shaft to give a positive location.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Capital City, Cow Hampshire, USA
Posts: 476
Good Answers: 3
#32
In reply to #30

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/17/2008 7:03 PM

That may be one of the issues that has been plagueing you.

If the tophat does not not fit the motor in exactly the same manner as your balancing arbor, the runout will change and offset the mass.

Would you consider up-rating the tophat?

__________________
If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you've always had!
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Capital City, Cow Hampshire, USA
Posts: 476
Good Answers: 3
#27
In reply to #21

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/16/2008 6:42 AM

Are you trying to achieve historic accuracy?

If not, let me propose an alternate path:

Permanently fit rotor to a mandrel (re-fitting usually alters balance), balance on knife edges.

Make up elastomer cushioned bearings for both ends of mandrel.

Connect to motor with a doubly flexible coupling (my preference at this time is the flex-disc style)

Allow the elastomer to damp motions.

__________________
If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you've always had!
Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Farnham, England
Posts: 15
#22
In reply to #10

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/15/2008 7:55 AM

P.S. The earliest blower I rebuilt was made in 1906. It was a monster cased in timber and about the size of a small car in a pit under an organ, the organ clearly having built over the top after the blower went in. No one else in the field would consider rebuilding it and the church were facing costs of £10,000 to £15,000 to replace it. Needless to say they did not have the money as in England many churches are not well subscribed. I rebuilt the unit for £3500 to a condition where it should easily do another hundred years including having the four impeller assembly, 38 inches in diameter, balanced way beyond its original specification. I do not subscribe to the idea of built in obsolescence or doing as little as you can get away with for as much money as possible hence I will not become a millionaire but I will rest easy at night.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Germany 49° 26' N, 7° 46' O
Posts: 1950
Good Answers: 109
#25
In reply to #22

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/16/2008 6:19 AM

Hi,

do you have the possibility to measure low AC voltage?, down to which level?

Do you have an electronics partner to build some basic amplifier and filter (analog)? or will you do this yourself (not really complicated.) <this is fastest and most easy way>

Do you want to measure phase at the two measurement planes by oscilloscope or by computer including software development, input card. (Phase and amplitude of the two unbalance signals compared to reference phase at arbitrary but rotor-fixed position.) <this is modern approach but requires considerable working time>.

RHABE

Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Farnham, England
Posts: 15
#31
In reply to #25

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/17/2008 4:17 PM

All the developement of this will have to be by me with some help from my new found guidance engineers. By the way I have seen two old GR Vibration Meters 1553A up for grabs. They do not however come with any vibration pick ups and there is no guarantee of condition. Might they still be a possible starting point. Alas I can find no specification for these units and GR is no longer in existence. They are American and it would appear that GR specialised in laboratory testing equipment. I realise they could be a pig in poke but might it be worth the chance especially if manuals and specs can be located?

James

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Capital City, Cow Hampshire, USA
Posts: 476
Good Answers: 3
#13
In reply to #9

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/14/2008 6:31 AM

If the impellers have a short length/diam ratio (say, ~1/5, or so), & are separable in the case of multi-stage blowers - perhaps static balancing would suffice?

__________________
If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you've always had!
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Germany 49° 26' N, 7° 46' O
Posts: 1950
Good Answers: 109
#14
In reply to #13

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/14/2008 12:11 PM

Yes, I think so too,

only one major difficulty that remounting is requiring extreme accuracy to maintain the achieved balance level.

So I assume that only precision ground conical matching surfaces will be adequate - thus making two-plane balancing more economic.

RHABE

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Capital City, Cow Hampshire, USA
Posts: 476
Good Answers: 3
#16
In reply to #14

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/14/2008 8:36 PM

How much do you rely on the motor bearings to define the rotational axis?

What #/yr are you contemplating?

__________________
If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you've always had!
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Germany 49° 26' N, 7° 46' O
Posts: 1950
Good Answers: 109
#17
In reply to #16

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/15/2008 2:58 AM

Yes, certainly,

motor bearings are one cause of unbalance in near perfect rotors.

very good ball bearings have concentricity errors between outer or inner mounting surfaces and raceways near or above 1µm, bad ball-bearings more likely around 5 to 10µm.

So if balance has to be stable then rings (rotating ones) have to have a tight fit to prevent any rotation!

RHABE

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: City of Light
Posts: 3943
Good Answers: 183
#11

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/12/2008 10:56 AM

1- If the parts are short with respect to their diameter then it is enough to measure at one end. If parts are long measure has to be done at both ends since the dis-balance will generate a torque due to its axial position.

2- The dis-balance generates a centrifugal force the higher the rpm the bigger it will be. It is possible to use also force transducers (S-type 2/support allowing a force measurement in x &y) to quantify it. This will simplify the design of the rig but it will reduce the relative signal. It is necessary to have a correct value of the rotating speed since without it the time affected at an operation can be too long.

3- You do not need to get involved in the electronic design as long as you do not want to make a series production. There are acquisition boards with several channels you can use with the sensors and many of them are already equipped with filters and even ADC so that you only have to couple them with a PC either via a series or USB connection. Most of them are delivered with the soft for acquisition and programming of the acquisition and data processing in the PC. A supplier is for instance National Instruments.

4- If you place somewhere a magnetic pickup you get a signal reference at every turn and the angle where the correction in +or- has to be done can be computed by the PC as value (in g x cm) and as angle with respect to this reference.

5- What is important is the mechanics of the rig which should be as perfect as possible in order to avoid parasitic accelerations when the parts rotate.

It is not a difficult project but it is one where details are important and have to be analysed very carefully.

If you need any further support use personal messages for your questions

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#15

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/14/2008 1:13 PM

Easy to balance, what speeds do the blowers run and what weight are they. Be glad to help you. I am a EE Electronic Engineer only in the Balancing field forr 35 years.

www.ghbalancer.com E-mail is info@ghbalancer.com

Regards, Gary L. Hildreth, Service Engineer-EE

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member China - Member - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CHINA
Posts: 2945
Good Answers: 14
#18

Re: Building a Dynamic Balancing Set

10/15/2008 3:49 AM

marking

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 32 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); Blink (1); boothville (1); cnpower (1); dadw5boys (1); Ed Weldon (2); jamescz121 (10); JohnDG (1); nick name (1); RHABE (6); sidevalveguru (7)

Previous in Forum: Mating Thread for Grease Fitting with DIN 714121 Threads   Next in Forum: Turbine Velocity

Advertisement