When I graduated from high school, I had the choice of attending a college or an institute. I chose the latter. I guess reading the course descriptions in the catalog was the main reason for my choice. Cost and reputation were also factors. I've always been a hands on kind of guy, so the courses offered at Pratt Institute in Brooklyn, N.Y. appealed to me. All the colleges offered courses that were primarily classroom oriented, but Pratt had laboratories, machine shops, foundry, pattern making, drafting, etc. Combined with classroom time, the curicullum was designed to produce a well rounded engineer. This education has carried me into my retirement years well. I've enjoyed the problem solving that has been my strongest asset. Being able to think, not only on a theoritical level, but on a practical level, has enabled me to come up with inovative solutions to common and not-so-common engineering problems. Even as I am retired, I still thing like an engineer. I don't spend time in front of the TV. I indulge in my hobbies that combine all the different engineering disiplines. You might say, engineering is my hobby. Whether it be woodworking, machining, railroad models, I can always utilize my background skills.
If I had gone to a conventional college, I'm sure my path would have taken me in a different direction. Instead of engineering, I might be a couch potato, watching football, playing golf and bridge every Wednesday night. Not that these are bad persuits, but they are not enough to sustain me. I need the challenge to maintain a meaningful life. I've never been driven by money alone