I've been doing research on Taxi Fleets and found that Ford is strong with LPG powered cars in Australia. Ford Falcons and Ford Fairlanes are mentioned in my readings.
I see no GM cars in the lists of cars used as Taxis in places like Australia, or Hong Kong. (Maybe I missed something.)
Could it be that Ford did not have to take bailout money because of taxi fleet sales of cars that run on LPG?
Propane in the US is commonly used for heating and cooking, and the price is apparently pretty much unregulated.
A couple of weeks ago, I was told by a propane dealer it was 2.39 a gallon, sans a .32 cent road tax.
With the road tax that would make it 5 cents more than what a gallon of gas costs around here currently.
In the US we are told that energy independence is called for, and that we have in the US a great deal of Natural Gas, and Propane and Butane are not a problem.
Apparently Ford makes cars that either run on LPG out of the factory, or are cheap enough to retrofit that it is commonly done in other parts of the world.
What difference does it make in the US that Gasoline has only one purpose, whereas Propane has two or three?
The Propane dealer I interviewed told me that if the US Congress even asks why Propane costs are high, the price immediately goes down.
Is it in the interest of US Citizens to demand energy independence by right of shared ownership of Natural Gas Fields, and a fair price for what is essentially a shared resource in its territory?
I hear they send you a check every year in Alaska from oil revenues.
Apparently people in Kuwait get similar, though more generous checks.
Where was I?
Yeah, what Fords run on LPG in the US, and why not more, when they do it in Australia and Hong Kong?
"Almost" Good Answers: