....so i had a couple amazing dreams, one has me working on a novel heat pump.... the other i offer for critique, entertainment...
Much consternation surrounds the lack of success in finding and understanding the widely accepted but still merely theoretical 'dark matter', and the repulsive 'dark energy'.
The armies embroiled search for the mythical dark pair, in hopes of explaining the large mismatch between the current prevelent theories, and the observed data....
perhaps searching for dark energy/dark matter is like searching for a 'Coreolis impetus' or a 'Coreolis sinnie-god' that generates the Coreolis force..... when in fact the phenomina is more easily explained with a considertion of frame of reference.
it is widely held that the universe possibly observable emenating froma point is more broad than could be traveled at the speed of light for the entire age since the initial 'b' in bang. this is rationalized by allowing for the actual growth of the space ....like an ant crawling across lycra which is being stretched.
it hit me in my dream that if the space and matter were spinning rapidly early in the bang... say maybe on the 'a' , that the 'need' for dark energy or matter might be as difficult to find as the actual (?) stuff .
Supposing that the instability that initiated the bang might have created an ossilation or separation of the relative spin rates of the matter/energy vs. the fabric of space.
much like being on a rapidly turning merry-go round, staring at the center and then vomiting directly in the center. without knowledge of any non-spinning (nonexistant) 'other' to reference your spin, the strange accelerations of your vomit as it spread outward from the center of the merrigo-round, might cause you to drunkenly decide dark gravity was the only answer for the acceleration, but indeed, you need to reference your spinning frame.
benbenben
ben griffin's drunken ballerina solution to the big bang accelleration.
ideas? ridicule? instruction? alms?
Good Answers: