Previous in Forum: One of Our Submarines ... (Is Missing)   Next in Forum: LOX Pump Selection
Close
Close
Close
7 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Anonymous Poster

Dual Stencilling of API 5L Pipe (i.e. X42/X52)

12/04/2009 10:49 AM

Can anyone tell me specifically WHY pipe now often has dual stencilling of the grade of pipe on the pipe and or pipe coating? Specifically, pipe I receive has stencilling saying API 5L X42/X52. When I see the dual stamping X42/X52, I'm inclined to conclude that it is dual stamped because (1) the ladle content of the elements used to produce the steel meets both the required max/min elements content for both X 42 and X 52 pipe and (2) the pipe meets the minimum yield strength of both X42 and X 52 pipe. And if this is the case, then why not just designate it API 5L X-52 pipe? What is the rationale for dual stencilling?

Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Anonymous Poster
#1

Re: Dual Stencilling of API 5L Pipe (i.e. X42/X52)

12/04/2009 11:48 PM

API X grade shows the minimum yield strength of particular grade. For instance X42 means 42000psi yield strength. Dual marking for different grades are some time acceptable for example ASTM A106 Grade B and API 5L grade. Both of have same strength but different requirement.

Adeel Ahmad

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#2

Re: Dual Stencilling of API 5L Pipe (i.e. X42/X52)

12/05/2009 12:03 AM

It is a controvercial issue, and I am not sure it is yet resolved. API as on now was a bit ambiguous in this matter, but now woken up. The revision of the standards may be on card. Wait till then.

http://napca.com/webfiles/2009_Workshop/NAPCA_-_Workshop_-_2009_-_Bob_Wise_Presentation.pdf

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Dual Stencilling of API 5L Pipe (i.e. X42/X52)

12/05/2009 12:12 AM

Sorry, just a bit outdated.

It is resolved now, dual marking is permitted if it meets the requirement of both the codes

http://www.api.org/meetings/topics/pipeline/upload/Ed_Baniak_Technical.pdf

look at page 47.

Reply
Participant

Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Dual Stencilling of API 5L Pipe (i.e. X42/X52)

12/05/2009 7:23 AM

The strength requirements for X42 are min. YS: 42,000 psi and min. UTS 60,000 psi, for X52 they are 52,000 and 66,000 psi. Thus it isn't exactly difficult to have a pipe which meets both requirements, and X46 (46,000 and 63,000 psi) as well! In fact, you could go up to X70 and still meet the requirements for the lower grades.

If you are working to PSL2, so long as the UTS doesn't exceed 110,000 psi and the elongation requirement is met, you could still use X70 pipe and meet X42 standards.

Regards,

Owen.

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Dual Stencilling of API 5L Pipe (i.e. X42/X52)

12/05/2009 7:29 AM

There are 2 guests

1: OP

2: Guest at #1

3. Guest at #2 ,#3 and #5 who is a pseudoguest

Your reply is to OP ?

Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Northeast corner of the sphere
Posts: 310
Good Answers: 7
#6

Re: Dual Stencilling of API 5L Pipe (i.e. X42/X52)

12/05/2009 2:09 PM

You will find more variation allowed within a grade than between the grades at their nominals. Thus you can look forward to seeing much more of this in the future.

__________________
How can you be two places at once when you're actually nowhere at all?
Reply
Anonymous Poster
#7

Re: Dual Stencilling of API 5L Pipe (i.e. X42/X52)

12/07/2009 5:25 PM

Usually pipe is dual stenciled at the request of a reseller (i.e. distributor) so they can sell either requirement out of inventory. Some end-users will request X-42 and actually not allow a substitution of X-52 out of fear the field welding and/or field bending specification was written for X-42. Having the pipe dual stencilled allows the seller to guarantee the buyer that even though the pipe is strong enough for X-52, it still falls under the max strength levels for API X-42. BTW, pipe will sometimes actually be tripled stencilled with Grade B added as well although this requires a little tighter window for the yield strength.

Reply
Reply to Forum Thread 7 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (5); Jerry New Hampshire (1); Owen Jenkins (1)

Previous in Forum: One of Our Submarines ... (Is Missing)   Next in Forum: LOX Pump Selection

Advertisement