I have to install steel pipes for water pumping stations and transmission pipeline , our specifications call for complete (full) joint penetration wedling , from our experience in the CJP and as it is required to chip off the cement lining from pipe ends to allow for CJP (about 5" chippoff from each side) , it is observed that repairing the internal cement lining after welding is not an efficient process and all the repaired cemnet lining is not strong enough and some times you can't fill all the welding joints and cover it with cemnet at all the area where it is been chipped off. Due to the inefficient method of repairing the cement lining there was asuggestion to go for partial joint penetraion to avoid chipping off the cement lining and the repair.
It is obvious that partial joint penetration can provide us with the required strength of the welding joint , about 85% from pipe thickness , and the PJP can provide us with the required pressure rate for the pipes.
My question , I believe CJP is stronger than PJP , but if we want to consider the damage of the internal cement lining issue and the effect of corrosion due to thE lost of the internal cement lining , DO YOU RECOMMEND TO GO FOR PJP ???
My second question is about the PJP , as we will not chipp off the cement lining , DO YOU THINK THAT CEMENT LINING CLOSE/BELOW THE WELDING JOINT WILL BURN DUE TO THE HIGH TEMPERATURE DURING WELDING ???
IF WE WILL STICK WITH THE CJP , CAN YOU PROVIDE ME WITH ANY GOOD PROCEEDURE FOR REPAIRING THE CEMENT LNINING FOR PIPES OF SMALL SIZES (3"-16") ??