The IPCC is now damaged goods

The IPCC is now damaged goods

meet:

NASA: 2009 Second Warmest Year on Record

What's really interesting is IPCCs spin on it.

Supposing that any PR is good PR we are all getting a better climate change education though those deemed guilty of fraud should be chastened accordingly.

We have learned that the earth is not experiencing an ice age and that reduction of glacial/polar ice pack is a normal occurrence during non-ice age periods. Also we have learned to double check our math and if a mistake is noted we should correct it.

Is the information from NASA also suspect? Why not? Is it not NASA scientists which started this quagmire of questionable influence peddling?

Supposing that any PR is good PR we are all getting a better climate change education though those deemed guilty of fraud should be chastened accordingly.

What type of education would that be?

I like this.....

The Chair, Vice-Chairs, and Co-chairs of the IPCC regret the poor application of well-established IPCC procedures in this instance.

I just want to talk the person in the big chair.

This is when scientific data becomes political. When that happens its basically becomes a spin to push an agenda through.

If they would just let the data speak for itself, instead of having its AG/GW minions shove it down ones throat, these minions would realize we are for the most part on the same side.

p911