Re: Which Way is Better Between DI Box and Microphone
04/17/2010 12:27 AM
Nobody can.
These two techniques are just different:
Direct Coupling (or Insert) is using the electrical signals, the way they are generated by the instrument. Of course we are talking about electric or electronic instruments.
Like e.g.electric guitar.
This results in a pretty clinical, poor sound, and misses most of the personal touch of the performer. (see further)
Acoustical coupling:
Sound transducers and/or microphones.
Musicians chose their instruments and want to create "a specific sound". They experiment with different amplifiers, effect boxes, speakers. Some like to partially
work in the cut-off preset of the preamp to create distortion, over overpower the speakers that "clip" the sound.
The effects are very difficult, if not impossible to re-produce in sound recording studios.
Position to- and distance between the speaker, and the microphone add to these
gigs and also the acoustics come into play. (room effects like echo and reverberation time and amplitude
*-* check the difference between life and studio performance records)
Also the type of microphone is pretty important. It changes the "timbre" too.
Base transducers need to work well in that range, cymbals need high pitch - and so on...
It is not question of better:
It is just your job as a producer- sound engineer to record a by the artist accepted sound. This is more like choosing colors - a feeling - thing.
It is a abstract communication- where sometimes terms as "more brown"-
pointer sisters punch- and other codes are exchanged.
This also counts for Public Address systems for Life performances.
Sometimes both are used together and mixed on separate inputs for e.g. more wedge monitor distinction.
If you want more about this, you can email me. I have a lot of studio and stage experience. Worked with names.
Re: Which Way is Better Between DI Box and Microphone
04/18/2010 6:07 AM
thank's very much for your comments.. I works with PA system in small pub and the problem that i found is the requiring from my guitar player to use microphone to picks the sound from speaker of the guitar cabinet instead of use my DI box and the reasons he say is it make more lifefully sound . I thinks it is wrong but i can't explain to him... In this presents we have DI box to branch the electric guitar to main mix. before send to cabinet that i thinks it's correct method ... But it is not correct ... I'm need to know the reason please!...
Re: Which Way is Better Between DI Box and Microphone
04/18/2010 5:02 PM
I still have room for 2 answers:
One:
That performer is probably using a acoustical electric guitar - one that has a hollow sound chamber. If he is e.g knocking on it to produce a drum like sound - a DI box will not pick it up that way and you will hear only some string vibrations. (Gibson?)
Two:
The input impedance of your DI box can have a mismatch towards his pick up element
(or incorporated pre- amp as some guitars have). This can make the sound "lack" harmonics and even create a mis-balance (I don't use unbalance here) resulting in poor
sound.
a too low input imp. steals your highs.
Not three:
If the guy plays on his own amp and speaker, try to copy the sound there, unless he is not happy with his own sound out of his box, or he wants you to perform tricks out of your side effects collection. If you go for a microphone, do a life check first.
Don't take one with a too big voice coil and very directional.
Vocalist with guitar is not easy - they forgot an orchestra to balance it out.
Couple of beers makes decisions easier.
Re: Which Way is Better Between DI Box and Microphone
04/18/2010 5:39 PM
Me again.
He likes how he makes his sound sound, with all the distortions, the invisible hocus pocus of the electrons moving from A to B, yes maybe he likes the scratch of his speaker cone - who knows - that is his identity and present formula for success and celibrity. Your sound will be different. But he is the performer.
Another acoustical event - called phasing occurs also when signals are out of phase. He can be playing music and you the anti- music or something between.
Same happens when the speakers are at different distances from the audience.
A P.A. system should be acoustically IN PHASE. First check all the speakers with a 1,5 or 3 volts battery and a push button. (we made on from a old pen flashlight) When you push and the + is connected accordingly to the speaker- the speaker should move forward. (high pressure)
Check all the lines, including microphone cables to see if they've been not inversed. When the drummer beats his base drum- the membrane moves forward. When your speakers go backwards you are in anti phase. Bass tones and low mids diminish and the whole partiture becomes a kakaphony. (= sound like s**t stinks)
It counts for each instrument microphone and for the vocals too.
Make it sound nice, trust your ears and look at the audience facial expressions.
I am sure you'll get it right, but I like some acoustical feedback better than a poor sterile sound.
Re: Which Way is Better Between DI Box and Microphone
04/19/2010 1:43 AM
very thanks for your valuable advice terms.. now i realize in words abstract communication... after we talks and dip with many beers we found the results by aligned tone from main PA. as likely as the cabinet sounds.. and do a less sound than his guitar cabinet for clearly note himself.. but still balancing sound for audience...
Good Answers: