Previous in Forum: Hydrogen Fuel Technology   Next in Forum: Capacitor - Resistance
Close
Close
Close
8 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Guru
Hobbies - CNC - New Member Popular Science - Biology - New Member Hobbies - Musician - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 3523
Good Answers: 146

Nanotech Carbon Capture for Fuel Production

04/18/2010 6:55 AM

Dr. Olah has prior credentials as a Nobel winner in 1994, so it's reasonable to believe the carbon capture technology discussed in this article is viable. I wondered what CR4 folks think about it, and second, what are the full implications/feasibility of switching to a "methanol" fuel economy.

__________________
incus opella
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Commentator
Australia - Member - New Member

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 92
Good Answers: 7
#1

Re: Nanotech carbon capture for fuel production

04/18/2010 8:16 AM

From the point of view of reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide, the replacement of any fossil fuel power with geothermal will have a similar impact.

So, replacing a coal power station with a geothermal power station will save at least as much, if not more carbon dioxide pollution as harvesting CO2, turning it into methanol and then burning the methanol.

The wisdom of creating a stategic reserve of methanol or dimethyl ether is another issue.

The use of the term nanotechnology in this process is stetching the boundaries, IMHO.

Register to Reply
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Engineering Fields - Transportation Engineering - New Member Popular Science - Evolution - New Member Technical Fields - Procurement - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Engineering Fields - Architectural Engineering - New Member Technical Fields - Marketing/Advertising - New Member Engineering Fields - Food Process Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mariposa Ca
Posts: 5800
Good Answers: 114
#2

Re: Nanotech Carbon Capture for Fuel Production

04/18/2010 11:38 PM

well it is better than a hydrogen scheme

methanol is nasty stuff, which will burn colorless & melts your optic nerves [blindness]

certainly an interesting idea[s]

Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - CNC - New Member Popular Science - Biology - New Member Hobbies - Musician - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 3523
Good Answers: 146
#4
In reply to #2

Re: Nanotech Carbon Capture for Fuel Production

04/19/2010 6:34 AM

"..methanol is nasty stuff,"

That's what I thought. I got a little suspicious when I saw them saying that it's mainly nontoxic to humans. This sort of statement seems more 'promotional' than realistic....

__________________
incus opella
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Germany 49° 26' N, 7° 46' O
Posts: 1950
Good Answers: 109
#3

Re: Nanotech Carbon Capture for Fuel Production

04/19/2010 2:35 AM

Hi,

this is big nonsense.

Nature is playing the same situation since now 3 billion years. Green algae invented this method that many years ago.

So what is the news?

Converting captured carbon-dioxide to new fuel will need more energy than released by burning the fuel.

So where is the energy coming from that is needed?

This should have been published on April 1st.

RHABE

Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - CNC - New Member Popular Science - Biology - New Member Hobbies - Musician - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 3523
Good Answers: 146
#5
In reply to #3

Re: Nanotech Carbon Capture for Fuel Production

04/19/2010 6:40 AM

If the nanotech capture approach doesn't/can't have the efficiency to make it cost effective for fuel production, then they must be doing this for the "carbon capture" dollars. The fuel production claims then become promotional as well.

Too bad.

__________________
incus opella
Register to Reply
Commentator
Australia - Member - New Member

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 92
Good Answers: 7
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Nanotech Carbon Capture for Fuel Production

04/19/2010 6:50 AM

It is a patent application at this stage.

Assuming it is granted, then they have 20 years and they have to keep the patent paid up.

I wouldn't sink my money into it.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: "Dancing over the abyss."
Posts: 4884
Good Answers: 243
#7

Re: Nanotech Carbon Capture for Fuel Production

04/19/2010 12:23 PM

Lets see, we want to stockpile a whole bunch of this flammable poison with a flash point of 11 degrees C?

i'll pass:

Appearance: clear, colorless. Flash Point: 11 deg C. Poison! Cannot be made non-poisonous. Causes eye and skin irritation. May be absorbed through intact skin. This substance has caused adverse reproductive and fetal effects in animals. Danger! Flammable liquid and vapor. Harmful if inhaled. May be fatal or cause blindness if swallowed. May cause central nervous system depression. May cause digestive tract irritation with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Causes respiratory tract irritation. May cause liver, kidney and heart damage.
Target Organs: Kidneys, heart, central nervous system, liver, eyes.

The dimethylether flash point is -41 degrees C. This has to be kept under pressure, is incredibly flammable and toxic as well as possible anaesthetic. So a tinky leak can, well, you can only imagine...

No comment on the other claims. hope the geothermal woks under a large coating of volcanic ash... but then, I'm just a poor sport as my flight to Europe got cancelled this weekend due to some local icelandinc geothermal related news...

milo

milo

__________________
People say between two opposed opinions the truth lies in the middle. Not at all! Between them lies the problem, what is unseeable,eternally active life, contemplated in repose. Goethe
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - Cardio-7

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 621
Good Answers: 10
#8
In reply to #7

Re: Nanotech Carbon Capture for Fuel Production

04/27/2010 1:18 PM

Not to mention that methanol in more corrosive to metal and rubber than is ethanol or ethylene glycol (with added inhibitor). Even the Navy had more sense than to store large quantities of methanol aboard submarines.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 8 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

artsmith (2); Cardio07 (1); Garthh (1); Milo (1); morrie (2); RHABE (1)

Previous in Forum: Hydrogen Fuel Technology   Next in Forum: Capacitor - Resistance

Advertisement