Previous in Forum: Bolt preloading & elongation   Next in Forum: Ultrasonic testing
Close
Close
Close
10 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 142
Good Answers: 1

Branch Size on Header

04/22/2010 9:05 AM

Is there a code to what the maximum size of a branch can be on a header?

Can we do 10" on 12" and still be with in code, is this referenced in the B.131.?

I have always heard the branch had to be 1/2 the size or less. (Steel Pipe)

Thanks.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#1

Re: Branch size on Header

04/22/2010 10:26 AM

Another rule of thumb is (or used to be) that branches must be at least two pipe sizes smaller than the header.

Larger or non-perpendicular branches have areas in the joint of lesser strength, and thus may need to be reinforced, similar to noxxle reinforcement on pressure vessels.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#3
In reply to #1

Re: Branch size on Header

04/22/2010 10:49 AM

Tornado, I believe that 'rule-of-thumb' has been derived (misinterpreted) from many company standards that state:

If the branch is size-on-size: Use a 'Tee'

If the branch is one or two sizes smaller: Use a 'Reducing Tee'

There is no code limitation - just "good" practice/design/fabrication.

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#2

Re: Branch size on Header

04/22/2010 10:46 AM

Save yourself the trouble - USE AN OFF-THE-SHELF 'TEE' or even a 'REDUCING TEE'.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 142
Good Answers: 1
#4
In reply to #2

Re: Branch size on Header

04/22/2010 4:03 PM

I hope the competition is going to use that approach that works for me.

Our objective was to reduce the diameter inches by eliminating the reducing tees and using saddles.

Thanks

PI

Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1149
Good Answers: 36
#6
In reply to #4

Re: Branch size on Header

04/22/2010 9:23 PM

Moderated Action: I removed the response post due to slander and inappropriate words.

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#7
In reply to #6

Re: Branch size on Header

04/22/2010 9:36 PM

{toned down response ...}

Yes, for any service that involves temperature, pressure, fatigue, or otherwise flammable/hazardous - your competition does use that approach, namely all large multinational oil companies and EPCs - particularly because of SIFs, thermal stress, and NDE requirements.

Only for benign service are other options qualified, including sweepolets, other 'olets, reinforced stubin, unreinforced stubin, .... allowed.

It seems that you are "shopping" for a code that you think will work for you. That is not right (nor even legal depending on your jurisdiction). Please first determine the code that you are to design to and READ it.

This is all dependent on the assumption that your company or client does not have a 'branch connection' standard.

Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1149
Good Answers: 36
#8
In reply to #7

Re: Branch size on Header

04/22/2010 9:59 PM

I appreciate your 'revision'.

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Participant

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1
#5

Re: Branch size on Header

04/22/2010 4:32 PM

Use a Bonney Forge weld-o-let. They have the reinforcement designed in. Any good industrial PVF distributor in your area should have them on stock. Cost somewhere around $250-300 - plus your labor for installation.

Register to Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#9
In reply to #5

Re: Branch size on Header

04/22/2010 11:04 PM

That kind of price is precisely why the OP wants to avoid using them.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 142
Good Answers: 1
#10

Re: Branch Size on Header

04/23/2010 7:09 AM

You got it Tornado! Although an occasional tune up is good for the soul.

Everyone Thanks for the input much appreciated.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 10 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (3); Jaxy (2); JUSTIN TYME (1); pipeit (2); Tornado (2)

Previous in Forum: Bolt preloading & elongation   Next in Forum: Ultrasonic testing
You might be interested in: Bar Code Scanners, Bar Code Cards, Bar Code Software

Advertisement