Previous in Forum: 4-20ma Across Phone   Next in Forum: Pressure Measurement
Close
Close
Close
4 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Member

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8

Pitot Tube vs Annubar

07/06/2010 10:43 AM

Hi

I know the basic difference between the two is that annubar averages out the fluid velocity by taking multiple samples from the stream. While pitot tube can do the same if the insertion point is somewhere in the stream where the velocity is equal to the average velocity.

Why would one be preferred over the other ?

The particular application I am looking for is Boiler Feed Water in a 14 inch pipe with mass flow rate around 900000 kg/h with inlet pressure around 1800 kpa and temp = 80 C

Could it be that accuracy of one is higher than the other ?

Regards

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
5
Power-User

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 335
Good Answers: 63
#1

Re: Pitot Tube vs Annubar

07/06/2010 8:40 PM

The comparison is between a pitot tube and an averaging pitot tube (Annubar is the brand name of an averaging pitot tube)


Pitot Tube:

Averaging pitot tube:

You are correct. The averaging pitot tube has multiple vented ports as shown by the arrows above, the purpose of which is to get an average DP across the flow profile.

Different manufacturers have various shapes and numbers of ports. The upstream ports are blocked from the downstream ports by a barrier in the tube. There is no flow through the tube, only flowing forces are applied to it, developing upstream and down stream pressures.

Four reasons industrials use averaging pitot tubes.

1) It is problematic to find a single point in a flow stream that represents the average flow. It would take portable active flow instrumentation to get readings and a trained analyst to determine where that point is. Who can afford the time or effort?

2) The DP cell is the largest percentage of cost, not the tube. There's minimal savings in a plain pitot tube over an averaging pitot tube.

3) Flow forces. Flow forces can beat on invasive flow elements. The averaging pitot tube comes in models that extend the entire diameter of the pipe for support at both ends. Pitot tubes can be made tough, aircraft use them as speed sensors, but averaging styles perdominate in the industrial world.

4) Permanent pressure loss is a big factor in choice of a primary flow element. Pitot tubes develop relatively low DPs with a correspondingly low permanent pressure loss. Sometimes, the available pressure is marginal and minimizing the permanent pressure loss is a major factor.

The HVAC folks use pitot tubes for getting air flow measurements in low pressure ducts and lab hoods, where the flows are not severe.

Use an averaging pitot tube on your high pressure steam line.

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 5)
Member

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Pitot Tube vs Annubar

07/07/2010 2:14 PM

Thanks alot ! Very detailed and clear answer.

Regards

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 335
Good Answers: 63
#3

Re: Pitot Tube vs Annubar

07/07/2010 5:34 PM

With regard to accuracy:

Any primary flow element error is grossly overshadowed by the deviation error from design temperature or pressure.

All primary flow elements are designed to produce a certain DP at a certain max flow rate at a design (given and assumed constant) pressure and temperature.

However as the graphs below shows, the errors from pressure or temperture deviations from design temperature is considerable, in whole percentage numbers.

I chuckle when DP transmitters are used for flow and the users get their undies in a bunch over the stated accuracy spec, whether it is 0.1% or 0.075%. Those differences pale when confronted with a steam line primary flow element designed for 100 psig but which runs at 95 psig with a 6% error for pressure deviation.

Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#4

Re: Pitot Tube vs Annubar

07/08/2010 4:23 AM

In a 14in-diameter duct, the flow is going to be turbulent and the velocity profile is going to be fairly flat. So, anywhere near the middle of the duct would do for the simple pitot tube to reference an "average" velocity.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 4 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Carl_E (2); DigitalMaster (1); PWSlack (1)

Previous in Forum: 4-20ma Across Phone   Next in Forum: Pressure Measurement

Advertisement