Previous in Forum: Valve Terminology   Next in Forum: NDT Gamma-Ray vs X-Ray
Close
Close
Close
11 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Power-User

Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 124

Windmill ?

07/29/2010 10:10 AM

Can or does this sound possible to incorporate a hydraulic circuit into a windmill system? By taking the pmg out of the axle of the windmill and replacing it with a 15" pulley connected to a 3" pulley a 5 to 1 racial. With the 3" pulley driving a hydraulic pump, in turn driving a compatible hydraulic motor, turning the pmg. Located under the mill on a platform. May also need a flywheel between 15" pulley, and mill tail for balance.Hydraulic circuit losses are minimal torque would be relatively the same 5 to 1 racial, should give a substantial rpm gain at pmg just a thought trying to break that 30% efficiency windmill wall.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#1

Re: windmill ?

07/29/2010 10:20 AM

Is it possible? Absolutely! Is it practical? Absolutely not!

If it were practical, don't you think someone would be doing it?

Search around, there was a blog on this not too long ago here.

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#11
In reply to #1

Re: windmill ?

07/30/2010 6:02 AM

BS. It is both possible and practical. The relatively lower inefficiency of the hydraulic drive has to be addressed, but it has many advantages. One is doing away with the weight and maintenance headache of the gearbox.

As for your second statement it beggars belief. Imagine the conversation; "Don't be daft Orville, if flying were practical don't you think someone would be doing it?"

Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#2

Re: windmill ?

07/29/2010 10:23 AM

<...just a thought trying to break that 30% efficiency windmill wall...>

Well, don't go that way, then. A hydraulic drive is much less efficient than a mechanical one, which is kind-of-important whent eh power source is as dilute and variable as the wind.

Consider drives akin to that on the modern safety bicycle instead.

UAA [UNDEFINED ABBREVIATION ALERT!]: "pmg"?

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#3
In reply to #2

Re: windmill ?

07/29/2010 10:30 AM

pmg= permanent magnet gizmo.

Remember, this is johnnyb5, who takes license with language just like he does physics.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 124
#4
In reply to #3

Re: windmill ?

07/29/2010 11:11 AM

Once again Mr Lynch sorry to piss on your Wheaties. The only license I carry is bail bonds april and johns bailbonds make a note. You may need me sometime were nation wide. You know when that untamed bad disposition gets out of control. I am certainly humbled by your greatness and as in all my previous post I have come to expect your indelible criticism. Not a physics major by far guess if I was I wouldn't have much use for the discussion board other then to ridicule the infidels.

P.S. You seem like a D V kinda guy. PMG permanent magnet generator or axle flux generator hmmm

Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#6
In reply to #4

Re: windmill ?

07/29/2010 11:49 AM

Thanks for the enlightenment. I don't eat Wheaties. I'll make a note of your employer's name, for future reference.

Sorry I got your panties in a bunch, check out the reference provided by JohnDG.

That's the one to which I referred.

You really shouldn't take offense at anything that is printed here. It's mostly just in fun. And as soomeone smarter than I once said, opinions are like a$$holes. Everybody has one, and most of them stink!

Glad to brighten your day!

Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Not a New Member Hobbies - Musician - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Reading, Berkshire, UK. Going under cover.
Posts: 9684
Good Answers: 468
#5

Re: Windmill ?

07/29/2010 11:22 AM
__________________
"Love justice, you who rule the world" - Dante Alighieri
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 124
#7
In reply to #5

Re: Windmill ?

07/29/2010 11:58 AM

thanks for the lynk it was very interesting maybe mr lynch should give it a view

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Gulf Coast
Posts: 209
Good Answers: 7
#8

Re: Windmill ?

07/29/2010 12:28 PM

I can't see where introducing the 20% or so inefficiency of a hydraulic circuit to what you state as a 30% direct coupled drive system would be advantageous. Given certain KW ranges, I'm sure the hydraulic drive would be good for frequency regulation but the system would have to be designed around the minimum mill speed/torque for required output. As the article implies, volumetric efficiencies are out the window over broad operating ranges and become impractical in high KW ranges. The article does give promise for future developments in hydraulic engineering, so go for it.

__________________
In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress. - John Adams
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South of Minot North Dakota
Posts: 8376
Good Answers: 775
#9

Re: Windmill ?

07/29/2010 1:04 PM

I don't see a problem with using the hydraulic system approach. I would however recomend using a low speed hydraulic torque motor like whats used on the drives of many skid steer and other industrial equipment drives as the pump. They are low speed so it can be direct driven plus the modern hydraulic components are very effecent. I am not sure where some people get the 20% and grater loss numbers for hydraulic drive systems but the more modern stuff is equal to a gearbox or any other mechanical system with efficencies of around 95% and higher being common.

By the way allthough I am recomending a motor to be used as a pump they do work both ways equaly well and do work in the very low speed ranges ,0 to a few 100's of RPM's, where most pumps dont.

Plus it is wind powered afterall so just put a bigger set of blades on it and dont worry about the efficency losses. Wind is free where I come from.

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#10

Re: Windmill ?

07/29/2010 1:55 PM

has anyone looked at http://www.chapdrive.com/ - they are doing hydraulic windmills right (here is a picture of what is a real unit) http://www.chapdrive.com/technology/ they have demonstrated a 225KW and 900KW unit. Presently are demonstrating a 5 MW generator - curious all the talk of Hydraulic being not practical or efficient as various bodies have found their numbers to be real - Red herring is one or many..

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 11 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (2); JohnDG (1); johnnyb5 (2); lyn (3); mareng (1); PWSlack (1); tcmtech (1)

Previous in Forum: Valve Terminology   Next in Forum: NDT Gamma-Ray vs X-Ray

Advertisement