Previous in Forum: electrics for a pmbldc motor   Next in Forum: Assess ONAN 4.5 BGDxxx Spec C
Close
Close
Close
2 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3

Sheath Voltages

12/02/2010 6:35 PM

Hi All,

I am looking at some cable installations at one of our substations (66kV). The cable run will be about 500 metres, give or take, with XLPE 400mm^2 copper cable buried in terfoil arrangement. (Direct in ground with HDPE sheathing etc)

Some basic data is: Ampacity = 610 (assuming double bonded), Sheath resistance: 0.263ohm/km.

We are looking at only bonding the sheath at one end and my question is how do I know/calculate what the sheath voltage at the open end will be under normal and fault conditions and whether or not this will stress the insulation of the cable between the sheath and outer jacket?

From what I can gather the voltage rise will be a function of the current, say 10kA fault, and the screen impedance along the distance of the screen, but I gather it's not as simple as V=IZ as the fault current will not flow through the screen as it is open bonded at one end? Assuming there is an earthing conductor run with the cables I am at a bit of a loss as to how to calculate what the sheath voltage rise will be?


Thanks in advance.

Twinsen

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Participant

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4
#1

Re: Sheath Voltages

12/03/2010 1:20 AM

Hi,

The are several different approaches to this question and there are different values of permitted voltages depending on your country. IEEE and IEC have guides for these induced voltages. The use of VSL's is one approach, but there appears to be little problems encountered if cables are in Trefoil and are under 500 Mtrs long and the sheafs and armoring are earthed at both ends.

I had asked the question regarding circulating currents on MV single conductor cables run in parallel in ground with SVL's at both ends. Since the length of the cables exceeded 1.5 Km we had several joints in these cables The mid point joint had both the Screen and armor joined together at either side of the joint but separated from each other and brought to a link box and connected in a Wye and taken to earth.

We had several failures of two cables almost simultaneously and it was found that the joints had failed due to excessive heating at the Joint area. Taking readings at the Mid point it was found the circulating current was around 50-60% of load but onlyon the sleads coming from the connections to the load side of the cable .After discussion it was decided to isolate the armor at the cable gland on the transformer case which was the at load end, thus isolating the armor to earth and leaving the shields connected to the SVL at both ends.

The result was the circulating current was now negible, however we now have to inspect all the buried joints and it is apparent that we now have stressed joints which could fail alter on.

The answer is to test for circulating currents and induced voltages as soon as possible when applying load to these circuits, and also design engineers really need to review the problems encountered with long runs of cables.

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 4)
Commentator

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: chennai, India
Posts: 55
Good Answers: 1
#2

Re: Sheath Voltages

12/04/2010 1:58 AM

If the bonding done at switch yard end, The potential appearing on the armour will be the ground potential rise expected at station ground mat.

As you have mentioned, the intention of grounding at one end only is to avoid circulating current through the armour that would be enormous, if grounded at both ends, due to Potential difference that may appear during fault condition on either end of the cable.

As long as the the sheath above the armour is capable withstanding the GPR ( Ground Potential Rise), which may roughly in the order of 11KV or less, the arrangement will be O.K.

__________________
There is nothing either good or bad, only thinking make it so -
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 2 comments

Previous in Forum: electrics for a pmbldc motor   Next in Forum: Assess ONAN 4.5 BGDxxx Spec C

Advertisement