Your research experience is a good story - tell it here

Take a look at my bio.

I agree that people might have made you to vanish in thin air for the claim you were making against them. You were the honey bee and they were the bear eating the honey.

How sad and how real ! Life is in pain not pleasure as pain last much longer than all pleasure put together and in the last until it becomes painful.

I call you a Hero.

Take a look at my bio.

Dear Sir ,

this is an idea may be a patentable as well .

the electromagnetic waves can be envoloped in the waves of a larger wavelenghts and such loaded envolope is trasported from one end to another by using a transmission and receiver model ( just like audio sgnals which we here on radio ).

the same principle can be used to trahsport the electrcal energy from one point where the generation is in excess can be transmitted to enrgy short area by this arial route.

andeshpande

Transporting energy by LASER Beam, Ion Beam has been tried out and perhaps is still a topic of research due to star wars scenario. Sun transports its energy to the earth and also to the rest of the universe and it is not going to be easy to have your own sun on earth.

FWIW: Revealing any invention puts it in the 'public domain' & renders it unpatentable.

You can look for patent or keep it for a purpose. You are a better judge of what you know. If you can transport energy just like that then then you can blow the world from remote and can become supper power. You can also export the power from one country to other without getting into export papers. God transports energy using sun rays, wind, water flows in rivers and lightning. God also binds the world in the tight strings of gravity to get the music of so called live universe. If you have greater knowledge and know what to make of your knowledge then just go for it.

I had discussions with Ron Blue, Lee Kent and others who were working on core theory and quantum memories and patented their work. It is now perhaps sold to NASA. It was indeed a great work. You may also be one like them and may know what to do with it. I do not have doubts as there are mysteries yet to be known.

Mr. Director Shyam,

please visit : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/ImageExperimentTORIS.JPG where is presented my experiment TORIS 1982 that seems to show an electromagnetical asymetrie betwheen two toroidal windings and a third cylindrical winnding .That remember us Oersted's affirmation on spiral shape of CONFLICUS ELECTRICI(now magnetic shape) around conductor with electric current.

I will be happy to see ,yours and others participants, the opinion on my interpretation.

Nic

This file looks like, has been deleted from the web link you have given.

Mr. Director Shyam,

please try to put in Search all of CR4 :

Spiral Shape of Magnetic Field afirmed OERSTED

thanks, Nic

spiral is only time component added to circular motion. DC current forms a circular magnetic field across a conductor and changing current bound to form an spiral magnetic filed to add time to its shape and compensate for propagation of charge density in the conductor. It is virtual perception added by the time as charge travels in space and magnetic field is a part of it.

Look at how photon moves and draw its magnetic field. I think there is more to it than meets the eye.

Keep thinking and you may hit another Nobel Prize idea. Talk about it the way you feel. Never mind what others feel.

mr. Director Shyam,

Thanks for yours good words !

If you whish to repet my experiment , please say . I will send some date .

Nic

I have improved experiments and 'interpretation' for measurements on only two toroidal windings : it seem to be a new way to induce a.c. !Thanks again mr. director Shyam for encouregements !

nicolaievlad

while we were discussing current transformer in another discussions, I noticed that only when conductor passes the core central hole its magnetic field is fully linked to the magnetic core and on the remaining winding the magnetic field is partially in the core and mostly in air. As winding progresses, the magnetic field in air may influence other things due to deformity. I need to do some experiments or have to compute all this before I can comment on it. Your experiment thus will tell the same thing.

That only part of the winding in each turn of wire plays role in transformers is worth noting.

mr. Director Shyam,

thanks for the message!

Please read my explanation on 'abnormality' demonstated with "TORIS 1982 "experiment:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:ExperimentTORIS.JPG

I will be hapy if you will repeat the measurements! For example ,take in consideration the dimensions for toroidal support :

-Diam exterior D=84mm; diam. interior 20mm;Long. L=135mm;material polyamid

-diameter for cilyndric support for induced bobbin =17.5mm [100 turns in two layers(50 left-hand turns on 50 right-hand turns with CuEmail 0.3 mm diam. condutor)].Material :polyamid or similar ,non conductive.The induced bobbin is placed in the hole of toroidal support ,in the midle position.

-On toroidal support are placed 6 left-hand turns over 6 right-hand turns made with CeEmail conducor 0.5mm diam.(in the drawing presented in commons.wikimedia are 10 + 10 toroidal turns).

- The measurements of induced a.c. emf must be made with multimeter powered with batteryes.( for example FLUKE 89IV)

I whish you success in measurements ! I will be happy to have a good replay!

nicolaievlad

Perhaps average electron velocity component will make the spiral to move along the line of conductor. Best thing to do is to use free electrons in vacuum to do this experiment where there is no resistance and no reverse direction bumping of electrons due to mean free path in conductors and also due to defects in conductors.

Ion beam current sensors can sense DC current by injecting AC component in the beam and then looking at its effect. Hence, DC current can induce AC voltages if field is disturbed by another AC source. This is a well known method of sensing DC ion beam current as they will not induce change otherwise in CT coil. Perhaps you can refer to such designs and measurement method.

Mr. director Shyam and mr. Nickjd ,

Thanks again for your attention..

I will anounce a big step in my experiments[ TUBIS 1981, TORIS 1982 , and some others..] : in a extreme simple topologic configuration, rezulted from two electromagnetic toroidals ,I have demonstrated an induced "REZIDUAL current" that can't be explained with FARADAY's electromagnetic induction!

That seem to be incredibile ! But my experiment generating the "rezidual" induced alternativ current is comparabil with Aharonov-Bohm experiment ,that are well explained in ' The Feynman Lectures on Physics" vol.2, capitol 15.

sidevalveguru, Is this the link you were referring too?

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:ExperimentTORIS.JPG

There was a colon missing.

I looked at the figure which shows large amount of top and bottom surfaces where electrical windings are generating magnetic field which can be easily picked up by the non-toroidal windings may be the reason to get field all the time in perpendicular windings. If the top and bottom area is reduced, the effect will come down. This problem exists in motors where emf acts on two sides of the coils and does not on other two sides of a rectangle sides under line integral.

mr.Nickjd,

Thanks for correcture !

What are your opinion on the explanation under the drawing presenting the "TORIS " ?

Oops, I just realized that I used that other persons name above, and not yours when I corrected the link.

I'm not really educated enough in that part of physics to be able to comment much on it. It all makes sense with the knowledge that I have from my physics classes. I've done the Biot-Savart law and related stuff, so I understand what it is talking about.

I thought that the explanation was very good. A little proofreading would make it a little more readable though. I'm not sure I understand the asymmetry though.

Nick

I had a professor who worked for an air plane company (don't remember which). He said that he had a scale model that cost about $200,000 in the year 1960 dollars (something like $1,000,000 in todays money?). He got all the strain gauges on there, and all the wires hooked up. He turned on the wind tunnel, and almost immediately it was blown off the mount, and was chopped into bits by the wind turbine blades. He said it felt even worse when some of the chopped up parts were circulated around past the window again... When he told his boss the results, he said it looked like his bosses head was going to explode.

Allegedly the chief designer at GM has a model of a Citroen DS on his desk as inspiration.

Money does not make much sense in the experimental outcome. All resources belong to the earth and to all of us and some people might have grabbed more than what they deserve only to blow them at some point. Becoming financially too Rich by knowledge is equivalent to cheating (not exactly Bill Gates case) those who do not have it somehow. Accidents that may be in the process of our efforts to do good to masses may be permitted and tolerated. This of the situation when banks blow off all your savings in their funny experiments. Money burning is not very amusing thing at all.