Previous in Forum: Automatic Power Factor Control Panel   Next in Forum: Russian Analog Control
Close
Close
Close
10 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2

Power Factor Correction

12/23/2010 8:42 AM

An electrical energy usage assessment was done at a factory i'm currently employed, the power factor observed at the main distribution panel was 0.62. Average real power is 162.9 kW and average apparent power is 268.2 kVA. A power factor correction unit was installed at the main distribution panel size 156kvar. Average new power factor is 0.91 at the main distribution panel. The local electricity supplier reports that they have not seen any change to their AMI meter. The power factor correction is applied to the secondary side of the transformer while the electricity supplier meter is monitoring the primary side. In addition the transformer is 1200kVA.

What could be the possible reasons for electricity supplier to see no change after a power factor correction at the main distribution panel? Can the transformer affect the correction?

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Anonymous Poster
#1

Re: Power Factor Correction

12/23/2010 8:54 AM

It doesn't matter you connect the PFC in either side please note the reactive power is decreased near the value active power in TOD meter. Make sure the supply intake is directly from the substation of the local supply provider with unity power factor. Do a little calculation on capacitor installation.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1686
Good Answers: 116
#2

Re: Power Factor Correction

12/23/2010 9:29 AM

Are you the only user of the secondary of the Transfo?? Could the electricity supplier's report be based on a spot check at a time when another user was putting a lot of lagging kVA on the system - or your own kVAr was at peak?? The transformer itself would draw only around 50 kVAr and it should change only in proportion to primary voltage. Remember, the supplier has motives for not giving you a tariff reduction!!

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru
Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 714
Good Answers: 38
#3

Re: Power Factor Correction

12/23/2010 10:04 AM

I used to work for a power company and our meters (at the generating station), while accurate, had a large enough scale that we wouldn't have noticed your change either. My suggestion would be to upgrade your local meter to ensure that you are being billed appropriately.

__________________
Sometimes my thoughts are in a degree of order so high even I don't get it...
Register to Reply
2
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California, USA, where the Godless live next door to God.
Posts: 4665
Good Answers: 804
#4

Re: Power Factor Correction

12/23/2010 11:39 AM

What meter are you referring to? Typically, an AMI meter is for kW only. Contrary to the claims by people selling capacitor systems as "energy savers", they do not significantly change the kW that the utility meter will read.

If the AMI meter is kVAR, it should show a lower kVAR demand from the utility.

__________________
** All I every really wanted to be, was... A LUMBERJACK!.**
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Anonymous Poster
#5

Re: Power Factor Correction

12/23/2010 10:48 PM

Was harmonic filtering done in your power factor unit with reactors? Your utility metering may need to be changed if it is capacitive in nature(check with your utility on this). Basically you use what is required for your equipment(kw). You only see a reduction in power usage if you can eliminate harmonics in your distribution system and have a power factor no greater than 0.95. If you can reduce the voltage tap on your transformers(per equipment voltage minimum) that will help also.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 348
Good Answers: 10
#6

Re: Power Factor Correction

12/24/2010 1:45 AM

It is a matter of interpretation of what the electricity supplier is saying; What they are really interested is to see the power factor at a minimum to their declared datum (I guess that would be 0.9) at their point of metering and assessment.

Correctly an electrical energy usage assessment should have been done at the point of metering of the Utility, while you have raised the power factor at the secondary side to 0.91the negating component of the transformer is giving a value of less than the datum to the Utility's assessment point.

Your PFI plant would be having an automatic relay, increase the relay settings to 0.99, if still you have some spare reactive capacity or provide additional capacitors in the bank if that is the deficiency.

__________________
Knowledge sharing is a WIN-WIN situation
Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 50.390866N, 8.884827E
Posts: 17996
Good Answers: 200
#7

Re: Power Factor Correction

12/24/2010 5:24 AM

Surely you need correction on both sides of the transformer? One for the load, the other for the transformer primary.....

Just my 2 cents worth.....

__________________
"What others say about you reveals more about them, than it does you." Anon.
Register to Reply
2
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1013
Good Answers: 36
#8

Re: Power Factor Correction

12/24/2010 5:44 AM

If you have a Maximum Demand meter (which should be the case when the supplier is charging you on KVA Demand ... i.e. affected by Power Factor), the change will be noticed by having a lower MD reading for the Billed Period, in comparison with the previous periods.

The MD meter measures the peak KVA drawn for the period being billed (monthly?). This will be reduced relatively. The kWh consumption will remain the same and not affected by the PFC panel.

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Associate

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 51
Good Answers: 4
#9

Re: Power Factor Correction

12/25/2010 2:02 AM

Have you checked the incoming power factor?

A transformer will not reduce the power factor, but the load seems to be very less on the transformer only 23%, what is the impedance and tapping on the transformer.

The incoming Supply power factor also should be verified and then we can give a proper reply to your question.

Normally the PF meter installed in the incoming breaker of the HV side of the transformer can tel you the details.

Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: chennai, India
Posts: 55
Good Answers: 1
#10

Re: Power Factor Correction

12/29/2010 11:39 AM

Dear Mr. Scotty, Your over all load mentioned is around 22% of your transformer capacity. you have compensated only the load demand of reactive power.

you have not considered the reactive power demand of your transformer magnetization current.

Therefore solutions are

1) load he transformer to near full capacity and suitably compensate for reactive load demand, then the pf at LV and HV side will be comparable

2) Or else reduce the capacity of transformer'to match your Max load and plan suitably for Var compensation

__________________
There is nothing either good or bad, only thinking make it so -
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 10 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

67model (1); amarnath.sn (1); Andy Germany (1); Anonymous Poster (2); ChaoticIntellect (1); JRaef (1); LAA_Lucke (1); mountk2 (1); Panneer Selvam (1)

Previous in Forum: Automatic Power Factor Control Panel   Next in Forum: Russian Analog Control

Advertisement