Previous in Forum: DC Motor   Next in Forum: Protection Relay Test Protection
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Commentator
Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Placerville, CA
Posts: 80
Good Answers: 8

Arc Flash Hazard

12/29/2010 6:55 PM

As a result of recent arc flash studies we have modified our switching procedures to facilitate dead-bus racking of 480V station service main bus breakers and 13.8KV generator breakers. Two of our powerhouses, however, have SF6 generator breakers which are unrackable but are equipped with NLB disconnect switches on either side of the breakers. Each phase of the switches is in its own metal enclosure and is separated from the other two phases. They are manually gang-operated by a hand crank external to the enclosure. We currently operate the switches deenergized but are questioning if this is necessary with respect to arc flash hazard.

If my understanding is correct, an arc flash hazard exists where there is the possibility of phase-to-phase contact. This might imply that, since each phase of the disconnect switches is separated from the other two phases with no possibility of phase-to-phase contact, there is not a risk of an arc flash event during switch operation. While we would like to operate the switches energized, I am not willing to change our procedure based on an implication. I hope someone can point me toward information to determine whether or not there is an arc flash hazard while operating the switches energized.

Additionally, the disconnect switches are designed to be operated energized but the manufacturer cannot take a stance one way or the other on the subject of arc flash.

__________________
ALL "electrical" failures are mechanical in nature.
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Power-User

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 348
Good Answers: 10
#1

Re: Arc Flash Hazard

12/29/2010 8:30 PM

If the circuit is loaded, breaking of the current path causes the arc flash.

With no-load (no current) the interruption under energized conditions cannot produce arc flash.

Do realize that energized long transmission lines even with no load at the far end draw a considerable amount of charging current hence there would be an arc flash on circuit interruption.

Rather than depending on procedures, make sure that the interlocks between disconnect switch and the circuit breakers is reliably functioning.

__________________
Knowledge sharing is a WIN-WIN situation
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canning Vale Western Australia.
Posts: 160
Good Answers: 7
#2

Re: Arc Flash Hazard

12/31/2010 10:39 PM

I find it hard to believe that someone would design a system with three load break switches in a row. Either that or when the FS6 became faulty it should have been removed when the new swithes were put in.

Even though you say they are metal clad around each phase I I would still consider them to be non load break switches, especially since they are hand crank design. I would be getting the FS6 breakers back into service for safety reasons.

__________________
I attend work so my dogs can have the good life.
Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: PO Box 746439 City Arvada, State CO
Posts: 12
#5
In reply to #2

Re: Arc Flash Hazard

12/26/2014 3:50 AM

Arc Flash Hazard is the term used to define the danger to people working on live parts. Arc Flash Hazard Analysis is a study investigating a worker's potential exposure to arc-flash energy, conducted for the purpose of injury prevention.Arc flash analysis, short circuit, protective device coordination, power flow, harmonics, dynamic stability.Arc Flash Hazard Warning Label to warn and instruct workers of the arc flash hazard, voltage, arc flash boundary and required PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) for safety.

Arc Flash Analysis

Ad Muncher

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 166
Good Answers: 4
#3

Re: Arc Flash Hazard

01/02/2011 7:53 PM

See NFPA 70-E

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Eastern Kansas USA
Posts: 1503
Good Answers: 128
#4

Re: Arc Flash Hazard

01/12/2011 9:17 PM

Mark684,

The post #1 is important. The NLB switches on either side of the SF6 breakers are strictly for use as isolators, to allow safe work on the cubicle in which the SF6 sits. They are suitable for operation while energized, but not while carrying a load current. You should have interlock keying that physically prevents their operation unless the SF6 breaker is open.

To safely interrupt a load current, they must 1) have blades that open swiftly via a spring and toggle mechanism, 2) have arcing contacts that are separate from the main contacts and open after the main contacts have opened, so the main contacts are not damaged by the arc, and 3) have a means of quenching the arc that is produced, such as arc quenching chutes and magnetic blast coils. Your description implies that none of these essential load-break features are present. If any one of them develops an arc across the opening contacts, it can quickly transfer itself into an arc from the energized contact to the nearby metal enclosure wall, and thus become a ground fault arc that can be extremely damaging to the equipment and a risk of harm to anyone nearby.

At one job site, I regularly work around 12.5kV switchgear. Some of the transformers have line-side isolation switches rated 600A continuous and 100A breaking. They are interlock keyed so they can only be opened when the secondary disconnect of the transformer is opened (so they are interrupting the magnetizing current only). I suspect these switches have a more robust rating than the ones you describe.

--JMM

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 5 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Doggoneit (1); Gazu (1); jmueller (1); martechnical (1); mountk2 (1)

Previous in Forum: DC Motor   Next in Forum: Protection Relay Test Protection

Advertisement