alternative energy resources has been a a volatile subject since the clinton/gore administration, but at what cost? is it feasible? do we have the technology for it to be cost effective? will cripple the economy?
at one time, over population was a huge subject. the number of people in the united states and world wide has almost doubled in the last 50 years.
common sense would dictate that the need for natural resources would follow in line.
the subject seems taboo for some reason. do you think think it involves the global economy and the race for financial supremacy?
Going Green
Re: going green
