Previous in Forum: Control System Specification   Next in Forum: Belt Scale
Close
Close
Close
10 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2

IP Review for Inst Tech

02/09/2011 1:26 PM

hey guyz, I am in the process of reviewing for my IP( Journymens) for Inst, and I have a nice review here, but some(alot) of the questions in this review are not answered. I looked for them, but cannot get them all.

Would it be cool if I posted the the questions that I got??, Hopefully some of you guyz can answer them for me.

Let me know,

Thanks

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - Don't Know What Made The Old Title Attractive... Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - 60 Year Member

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Yellowstone Valley, in Big Sky Country
Posts: 7425
Good Answers: 295
#1

Re: IP Review for Inst Tech

02/09/2011 1:32 PM

Oh, my goodness.

We ARE going to hell in a basket.

"... can answer them for me."

__________________
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2
#2
In reply to #1

Re: IP Review for Inst Tech

02/09/2011 1:39 PM

I don't get it? I'm still looking myself for the answers, but I don't want an incomplete study guide. I got 3 weeks left before I write my IP.......anyways, I thought this would be a bad idea.

Back to the drawing board

Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - Don't Know What Made The Old Title Attractive... Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - 60 Year Member

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Yellowstone Valley, in Big Sky Country
Posts: 7425
Good Answers: 295
#5
In reply to #2

Re: IP Review for Inst Tech

02/09/2011 1:47 PM

Creepin_D, if there are questions you cannot answer because you do not quite understand some portion of the solution, someone will probably be willing to discuss and explain, in an attempt to help you truly understand how solutions are arrived at.

Simply asking us to fill in the blanks of your paper... that will be resisted.

[edit] I see a member has come forward with some blank fillers! #10 is 316L.

__________________
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#8
In reply to #5

Re: IP Review for Inst Tech

02/09/2011 3:00 PM

"#10 is 316L."

Only if it is 316L. It might be just plain 316 with the extra helping of carbon left in.

Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - Don't Know What Made The Old Title Attractive... Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - 60 Year Member

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Yellowstone Valley, in Big Sky Country
Posts: 7425
Good Answers: 295
#9
In reply to #8

Re: IP Review for Inst Tech

02/09/2011 4:41 PM

Question #10 on my IP (Journymens) for Inst was:

"Which metal from Table 3 will be selected for Body Piercing material?"

As I had already used from Table 3 the ASTM F-67 compliant Titanium, the 316L is the remaining proper selection here. Perhaps your IP (Journymens) for Inst was different than mine. I cannot remember if I even got that one right...

__________________
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#10
In reply to #9

Re: IP Review for Inst Tech

02/09/2011 8:33 PM

Oh, that. You're right. I had spilled catsup on that page.

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Anonymous Poster
#3

Re: IP Review for Inst Tech

02/09/2011 1:41 PM

Get someone to take the test for you, easier than blogging your way to the prize.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#4

Re: IP Review for Inst Tech

02/09/2011 1:47 PM

Here's some answers, just for you.

1. 6 V.

2. Negative

3. 4-20mv

4. Red

5. Black

6. Neutral

7. Positive

8. Ohm's Law

9. E=Mc2

10. 316 Stainless steel

If you need more, just ask.

Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#6

Re: IP Review for Inst Tech

02/09/2011 1:59 PM

Here are some more:

  1. 24VDC
  2. green/yellow
  3. Residual Current Breaker Overload
  4. Capacitance
  5. Tuning fork sensor
  6. Only one end
  7. twisted pair screened
  8. preferably at right angles
  9. RS422
  10. Reconfigure the card's internet protocol address
__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#7
In reply to #6

Re: IP Review for Inst Tech

02/09/2011 2:06 PM

Thanks,

"IP( Journymens) for Inst" really isn't my field.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 10 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); Creepin_D (1); Doorman (3); lyn (4); PWSlack (1)

Previous in Forum: Control System Specification   Next in Forum: Belt Scale
You might be interested in: IP Cores, NEMA and IP Enclosures, VoIP and IP Telephony

Advertisement