Nukes- Disaster getting worst

Reactors should be built with passive emergency cooling.

If no active action: pumps, electricity, control is necessary to provide the after-heat cooling capacity then this situation would not be nearly as critical!

Emergency cooling water storage on-top the reactor vessel with rupture disks to release some or all of the water if inside pressure is too high and similar if inside cooling is too low.

Second: any hydrogen at pressure is a potential high risk.

Why do they allow this?

Bring in oxygen to reburn it to water. This is an inverse flame, that is burning at the mixing zone of the oxygen and the inside will stay with enough hydrogen to continue burning until the pressure is down.

There seems to be also a problem with the total shutdown of the nuclear reaction as they pumped seawater enriched with boron into the reactor. Boron is a neutron absorber. So what is going on???

RHABE

I see nothing in the post Admin would have OT'd it for, nor 5 mysterious voters to OT it for.

I therefore think the 5 OT was a self OT.

Now 4 due to 1 'canceling vote' - presumably yours.

Strictly speaking you should have put your comment OT

And I note 1 person (not me) has marked it so.

This comment is also OT, so I will put it so.

But don't worry, most members read them all anyway.