Power Saving Calculations Through Power Factor Improvement
03/14/2011 8:38 AM
What is the actual power saving through power factor improvement at motors / LT panels / Generators. How one can calculate the reduction in electricity consumption after power factor improvement.
Re: Power Saving Calculations Through Power Factor Improvement
03/14/2011 10:59 AM
PFC devices benefit the power producer more, hence the added fees for poor power factor by the end user. Your equipment uses the same power as before, but devices with windings tend to run warmer producing more heat as a "waste" product, but operating exactly as designed. Improved PF may benefit the user by extending the life of their equipment.
Re: Power Saving Calculations Through Power Factor Improvement
03/15/2011 10:08 AM
You can but it is not as simple as that.
You see the reactive current (or power) is the demand of the load, and that has to be met (say a motor runs at 0.85pf then it will draw the reactive current corresponding to this, no matter what.
What you can do is to put the pf compensator (PFC) so that the reactive power is supplied by the compensator and not from the source (ie power supply utility).
The reactive current now loops between the load and the pfc and the corresponding I2R loss will take place here, in addition to a bit of loss in the capacitors that you have added.
The saving will be in the I2R loss between the PFC and the say supply transformer. However these usually will have cables with sufficiently low resistance and thus the saving may not be worth the effort.
Same happens to the generators- which try to compensate (or supply) the reactive power by controlling its field excitation, thus increasing its field coil losses along with the increased I2R loss in the armature.
Again the saving will not be significant unless the pf is really low.
This matter has been discussed several times in CR4 with the net result- not worth it unless
a) pf is too low
b) There is a penalty on low pf
c) The loads are distributed over sufficiently long distances (thus having significant line losses) and the pfc is put in the vicinity of the loads (or at least local nodes, as is done in our factory)