Previous in Forum: Hazardous Area Classification   Next in Forum: Focal Adjustment to Compensate for Refractive Index
Close
Close
Close
7 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Member

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5

Displacer vs. DP LT

06/15/2011 5:51 AM

Displacer and DP LT are both dependent on specific gravity of the fluid in a drum / vessel. Please let me know the selection criteria or when I shall go for Displacer rather than DP measurement?

Thank you all in advance.

Register to Reply
Pathfinder Tags: Displacer DP level transmitter
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#1

Re: Displacer vs. DP LT

06/15/2011 5:55 AM

A displacer can only operate relative to atmospheric pressure above the liquid level. So if the vessel is sealed and pressurised, a displacer cannot be selected, whereas a differential pressure instrument can be.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Washington USA
Posts: 566
Good Answers: 53
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Displacer vs. DP LT

06/15/2011 11:45 AM

Sorry PW, this is not correct. Displacers are successfully deployed into many pressurised applications. Boiler steam drums are one example and the reason they are preferred to DP cells for this purpose is that the dry leg of a DP level transmitter can gradually fill with condensation which will show a false low level.

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Associate

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: brisbane, australia
Posts: 25
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Displacer vs. DP LT

06/16/2011 3:39 AM

Stream drum level by dP always has 'a wet leg' reference.

penttijp

Register to Reply
Commentator
Venezuela - Member - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Venezuela
Posts: 88
Good Answers: 5
#4
In reply to #1

Re: Displacer vs. DP LT

06/16/2011 7:56 AM

Friends,

I´m agree totally with Ace Boeringa, In our plants there are a lot of displacer working in pressurized vessels.

Regards

JP

__________________
Instruments-guy-SAV
Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: brisbane, australia
Posts: 25
#5

Re: Displacer vs. DP LT

06/16/2011 8:25 AM

This depends greatly on the type of vessel, turbulence, ease of making outside connections among many other things. Much like what type of car to buy. If you give your application(s), I can help.

penttijp

Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 16
#6

Re: Displacer vs. DP LT

06/30/2011 11:26 PM

reference leg of DPT for STM DRUM is always wet. Condensate pot is provided.

Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: brisbane, australia
Posts: 25
#7
In reply to #6

Re: Displacer vs. DP LT

07/01/2011 6:40 AM

Yes, I said the same before. Sadly some of the people replying do not know much about these systems.

penttijp

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 7 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Ace Boeringa (1); erolf (1); Instruments-guy-SAV (1); penttijp (3); PWSlack (1)

Previous in Forum: Hazardous Area Classification   Next in Forum: Focal Adjustment to Compensate for Refractive Index

Advertisement