Previous in Forum: final year project   Next in Forum: Calibration
Close
Close
Close
2 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: oz
Posts: 252
Good Answers: 10

4-20mA Simulating vs Sourcing

07/28/2011 9:06 PM

When will you simulate 4-20mA as oppose to sourcing 4-20mA. I notice some of the calibration instruments gives you a choice to use one or the other.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#1

Re: 4-20mA Simulating vs Sourcing

07/28/2011 11:57 PM

I don't think there is anything "vs" or "opposed" between simulating and sourcing. Do you mean sinking vs sourcing?

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Power-User
Hobbies - HAM Radio - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 252
Good Answers: 5
#2

Re: 4-20mA Simulating vs Sourcing

07/29/2011 5:25 PM

The difference is not as clear cut as one might think.

You can simulate a transmitter by sourcing current if the transmitter powers the loop. Typically known as a 4 wire transmitter where power is not supplied to the transmitter through the 4~20 mA output.

You can simulate a transmitter by sinking current if the instrument or an external source powers the loop. Typically known as a 2 wire transmitter where power is supplied to the transmitter through the 4~20 mA output.

As a general rule:

When the 4 to 20 mA loop is powered by the transmitter, use source to drive a signal back to the instrument.

When the 4 to 20 mA loop is powered by the instrument, use sink to drive a signal back to the instrument.

This seems the best I can do on a sleepy Friday afternoon!

Have FUN!
TT3

__________________
If the software can detect, compensate, avoid, or correct an anomalous condition in the system, it is, by definition, a software problem-regardless of the root cause. In the long run, for most classes of problems, it is cheaper to fix it in the SW
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Register to Reply 2 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!

Previous in Forum: final year project   Next in Forum: Calibration

Advertisement