Previous in Forum: Architecture of Mex Starter   Next in Forum: What Does DC Current do to AC Only Devices
Close
Close
Close
17 comments
Anonymous Poster #1

Induction Heating

09/24/2011 7:52 AM

For commercial purpose(home) induction heating is economic or not? How much heat efficiency when compared to resistive heating?

Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Comments rated to be Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive ratings to make them "good answers".
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Resting under the Major Oak
Posts: 4347
Good Answers: 181
#1

Re: Induction Heating

09/24/2011 8:40 AM

What are you going to heat by induction?

__________________
The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated.
Reply
Anonymous Poster #1
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Induction Heating

09/24/2011 9:22 AM

Two cup of tea.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South of Minot North Dakota
Posts: 8378
Good Answers: 775
#3

Re: Induction Heating

09/24/2011 9:31 AM

If you cant afford to heat two cups of tea you cant afford an induction heater either!

How do you plan to heat the tea using an induction heater anyway? Induction is electromagnetic and only works on moderately conductive materials like metals.

Reply
2
Power-User

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 173
Good Answers: 3
#4

Re: Induction Heating

09/24/2011 9:43 AM

Inductive heating is not ecconomical.

Are you asking for better way to be efficient in heating your home? Over the use of gas or electric forced air?

There are ways to build a home that is very energy efficient with either unit. Your design is to have more flow through ducting in the house, which will help circulate the air. This is the same for cooling as well. The designs of ventilation is old and antiquated, and mostly does not allow for economic savings. I grew up in Florida years ago and was involved in building some of the best thermal designed homes one could ever imagine living in, especially in todays high dollar demands for power.

The best design, which is 1/3 more expensive over either forced air system, is the use of a boiler, a chiller of sorts, and radiant heating/ cooling in the flooring of your home. The use of radiant barrier materials in the attics, more circulatory ducting in the home, which is fed from room to room instead of returns used in todays designs, and mostly, interior/ external wall gaping. Simple terms, this design was first used back in the early 40's down in the desert hot regions of Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, and further south of the boarder. Exterior walls up to 24" thick, 6" air gap, 6" interior walls. In the mid 70's I was fortunate enough to help build a home using micro-fibers, Styrofoam mixture in the concrete to pour in the formed walls. The 6" air gap was the key to regulating the interior temps. The interior walls had a radiant barrier film, before the drywall was hung. The air-gap had a circulatory vent system that kept the standing air from effecting the interior. It was controlled by your actual heating and cooling system, while the interior of the house used in floor radiant system, which was set at 74*F year round. Overall heating and cooling power usage, which was both gas and electrical systems, less the $300.00 per year.

Over all cost to build the house, less then $100K including the concrete poured walls.

In todays market, it still can be built for less then $100K. Key factor is the air gap. The Japanese have been building energy efficient buildings for years with their duel roofing and ventilation systems as well. The secondary roof keeps the interior roof 20 to 30 degrees cooler in the hot months, and helps keep the heavy snows from freezing the interior roofing structure. Plus the use of the roll up bamboo side shields was used to help keep escaping heat with in the exterior air gap.

This technology has been in existence for hundreds of years, long before the USA was even born. it is a real shame that ancient technology has been pushed to the wayside because todays engineers don't have a clue to simplicity of old world achievements in ground breaking technology.

Maximo

Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Anonymous Poster #2
#7
In reply to #4

Re: Induction Heating

09/24/2011 10:55 PM

Nowadays there are much more efficient ways to build a house.

We NEVER use a heat source in the house. In the coldest days we just let the sun heat up our interior - furniture - walls - and thick concrete floor that sits over a 4 feet high basement.

All walls are styrofoam boxes, poured with concrete.

The insulation factor of our house is 2 X better than a modern refrigerator.

Avg. 1/4 plaster + fiberglass net + 2,5 inch styro + 7,5 inch concrete + 2,5 inch styro + 5/8 gypsum board.

Trocal PVC doors and windows have rubber gaskets and 5 point locks - triple glaze.

In winter we play a little with blinds and have a comfortable temperature.

In summer we exhaust the hotter air just below the 10 feet ceilings and manage to use AC for less than a month and 9000 Btu's per 1100 square feet to get the temp

to 25 degrees celsius.

Climate like South Florida.

I hope to bring also good news soon on how it works with $0.00 power bills on 2500 Watts solar panels for a total of 8,000 Square Feet living areas.

(for 3 families)

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: 1° North Singapore
Posts: 568
Good Answers: 17
#8
In reply to #7

Re: Induction Heating

09/24/2011 11:25 PM

Avg. 1/4 plaster + fiberglass net + 2,5 inch styro + 7,5 inch concrete + 2,5 inch styro + 5/8 gypsum board.

That is more than 13 inch wall !
Wonder how much more it will cost to have this elaborate wall construction.
Also, what about your roof , you must have equally well insulated roof, how is its construction like?
Hope you can share your experience.

__________________
Sharing knowledge is one thing that defies basic arithmetic logic --- the more you share, the more you get!
Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In the pool because it is too hot.
Posts: 3054
Good Answers: 141
#11
In reply to #8

Re: Induction Heating

09/25/2011 2:37 AM

in semi - hurricane modeAC unit on the right is 4 Tons for the whole buildingPicture taken just after hurricane Irene passed by.
See the concrete decks - 1 = level with the top stairs2 = at overhang - supports the walls of second (or third)floor. - All bath- and bed rooms and the not coveredparts are closets - which brings the ceilings also to 10 feet.The attic is also one big space with 2 feet styro ring ductand individual taps for air or A/C per room. Can work in reverse.Composition floor: in bed rooms 5/8 gypsum - hollow space6" - 5/8 plywood - 2" styro HD - floor on top HDF 24 mm.
Floor to ceiling attic 7.5 feet.Roof.6" rafters with 5/8 plywood - nailed #30 felt with torch onroofing with stone (went through hurricane Frances for 36 hin a row) - later covered with steel tile- like roof.(The fake chimney is actually a hot air exhaust and drainage vent - but I still need to install more inlets at the bottom tolower the temperature in the attic. I don't want to paint theroof a light color - yet)The blocks are I.C.F. (make I.C.E). It is easy to build butrequires good carpenters to keep it straight for pouring andto box in the openings for doors and windows during construction.If more details wanted, please let us know.

older picture from the back side without hurricane shutters

__________________
Plenty of room here
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Eastern Kansas USA
Posts: 1502
Good Answers: 128
#16
In reply to #8

Re: Induction Heating

09/25/2011 5:44 PM

bravo88,

What he has described is like a standard 8" ICF (insulated concrete form) wall with a standard synthetic stucco exterior and directly-applied fire rock on the inside. The typical installed wall cost is about 10-25% more than for a stick-built 2x6 frame wall, but much less, if you did your stick-built to the same energy efficiency numbers. In a temperate environment, the annualized R-value for the wall is close to R-50 (but the ASHRAE value is closer to R-26); the air infiltration is zero, the risk of mold or mildew is virtually zero, and the strength is beyond compare (try wind speed resistance greater than 200mph).

At the top of the wall, use trusses with a high-heel (minimum 12") and Simpson or equal strap ties that are embedded into the concrete when it is poured. These ties will wrap around the truss and can give uplift strength well above the uplift of a 150mph wind for very little cost increase over the uplift strength needed for a 115mph wind. This roof construction will allow blown-in R-50 cellulose insulation. If you want a sloping ceiling (aka cathedral ceiling), you can opt for thick factory-built panels sandwiching polystyrene foam between two layers of treated OSB, and get a similar R-value and fairly-fast erection.

These construction methods are readily available in all areas of North America as well as over 50 countries world-wide. They are recognized within the International Residential Code as well as a number of other model building codes.

--John M.

Reply
Anonymous Poster #2
#17
In reply to #16

Re: Induction Heating

09/25/2011 6:46 PM

Only the block is a typical 11" wide ICF. You can find the specs under I.C.E. (isolated concrete efficiency) block. Was one of the first serious ones but probably also the most expensive, compared with what is offered now.

These have metal sheet bridges inside. You can have a look at what the concrete at the inside looks, when you see the wall of the garden. Here the styrofoam has been stripped off afterward to have the pattern showing. The structural concrete has a wafer wall frame with 8" concrete columns (1 rebar #5) inside and horizontal connection beams with the same rebar. We have build 3 buildings: the shown one is designed and tested in the mean time for wind speeds up to 380 Mph. The shutter system 350 Mph.

The house has been in 1 hurricane #5 and been struck by a tornado in it for now. The owner considers calling it tornado home now.

The stucco is applied on a synthetic mortar bed that has fiberglass mats in it.

The other building are much higher and bigger: resp. 18,000 and 45,000 square feet with the equivalent of 4 storeys. Apart from roof tiles there has been no substantial damage with none of them.

ICF manufacturers are too optimistic when it comes to time consumption to use it. We paid the block like $15,00 for the equivalent of 6 regular building blocks. Add steel and concrete here and your wall costs more than double. However the payback time is fast.

People with similar square feet houses pay a power bill of $2,000.00 here while this one here is only $250.00.

Reply
Guru
Hobbies - CNC - New Member Popular Science - Biology - New Member Hobbies - Musician - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 3524
Good Answers: 146
#5

Re: Induction Heating

09/24/2011 11:20 AM

Induction heating of water is less economical than resistive heating, which is close to 100% efficient:

http://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/23389/Magnetic-induction-for-hot-water-heaters

In the case of an electric radiator, you are also bound to lose efficiency by using induction instead of directly generating heat by passing current through resistors in series. And it will cost more to build it, to boot.

I got curious and had a look to see if there's a workable microwave heating design, and that doesn't look promising either. The commercial prototype that was hyped in 2005 turned out to be 'vaporware'.

The heat pump is the only technology that offers more return for the input than resistive heating - by using energy to scavenge heat instead of making it.

__________________
incus opella
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1056
Good Answers: 88
#6

Re: Induction Heating

09/24/2011 2:49 PM

You can only effectively "induction heat" paramagnetic materials like (some, not all) metals. The only gain you can pursue with induction heating is the energy difference for the less mass that has to go to final temp, mass that normally includes the heater itself, surrounding structure etc. But you do add significant conversion losses, so it's only worth the trouble in certain cases like very high target temperatures e.g. metal furnaces (that a resistive element wouldn't handle) and/or very low duty cycle (that would make heat insulation for your device impractical) and unfavorable mass ratio between heater (and it's structure) and the item to be heated. (e.g. a cooking pot) S.M.

__________________
Life is complex. It has a real part and an imaginary part.
Reply
2
Associate

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Spokane Wa. USA
Posts: 29
Good Answers: 2
#9
In reply to #6

Re: Induction Heating

09/25/2011 12:32 AM

Induction heating for cooking with one of the new induction ranges or induction "hot plates" can be very efficient. There is a loss from the high freq power inverter which is 80 or 90% efficient. But all the power is absorbed by the pot, pan or kettle. when you use an electric or gas range top nearly half the heat goes right up around the pot you're cooking dinner in. This feels good on a winter morning but is a big waste of energy. The only requirement for induction cooking is that the pan or pot has to have an iron bottom (like a cast iron frying pan). I Purchased one of the induction hot plates from Newegg for around $50 as a gift to a family member and it was a hit. truly amazing device.

Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Anonymous Poster #1
#10
In reply to #9

Re: Induction Heating

09/25/2011 1:07 AM

GA for you.

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 344
Good Answers: 17
#12

Re: Induction Heating

09/25/2011 3:45 AM

Why not heat water etc in well-insulated containers. Most are thin plastic or metal.

Also for cooking use an electric frypan with a lid, sitting in an insulated bed, and an insulating lid over it. With a large frypan, you can bake in this instead of using a badly insulated oven. The oven could be insulated on the ouyside with glasswool batts.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Izmir, Turkey
Posts: 2142
Good Answers: 31
#14
In reply to #12

Re: Induction Heating

09/25/2011 7:35 AM

You could also use an open fire or hot rocks.

Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 50.390866N, 8.884827E
Posts: 17996
Good Answers: 200
#13

Re: Induction Heating

09/25/2011 6:15 AM

Forgetting for the moment induction cooking (with the right pots and pans of course, the ONLY way to cook on a stove!) as that doesn't belong here!

I personally cannot imagine how any form of induction can be used to profitably heat a house or apartment......but of course I am not some "fly-by-night" salesman, I am sure that some of them have completely opposite ideas.......

Firstly, as mentioned already, electric heating is not the best (financially) way to go. If you have no other choice then use resistive block heating with louvres that you can adjust to change the temperature, with "over-night" (usual in many parts of Europe) heating on a cheaper tariff than normal......

A well insulated house will repay its cost many fold with regard to the electricity bill!!!! (also as several have already mentioned!!).

The best way is always to reduce your reliance on any fossil fuel, or energy source that uses fossil fuel....be CO2 aware as well......

Best of luck........

__________________
"What others say about you reveals more about them, than it does you." Anon.
Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Cosmology - Let's keep knowledge expanding Engineering Fields - Retired Engineers / Mentors - Hobbies - HAM Radio - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: North America, Earth
Posts: 4484
Good Answers: 106
#15

Re: Induction Heating

09/25/2011 1:20 PM

Is this what you want to use to heat your home?

You may need the Chinese to hook it up for you.

__________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” - Richard Feynman
Reply
Reply to Forum Thread 17 comments
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Comments rated to be Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive ratings to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Andy Germany (1); Anonymous Poster (4); artsmith (1); bravo88 (1); dvmdsc (1); jmueller (1); LordMaximo (1); Phaddy (1); russ123 (1); SimpleMind (1); StandardsGuy (1); tcmtech (1); TonyS (1); Zamaron (1)

Previous in Forum: Architecture of Mex Starter   Next in Forum: What Does DC Current do to AC Only Devices

Advertisement