Can estimating system power consumption when sizing sources or distribution panels be reasonable or less subjective? In my experience, the estimate consistently far exceeds the actual fielded load.
For starters, there is the list of equipment manufacturer name plate power consumption ratings. The assumption here is that the manufacturer must(?) conform to some industry standards in arriving at the name plate rating. Granted, the average consumption will be less. However, the rating (at max temperature, max capacity) cannot be ignored.
To satisfy design review critiques, one must be able to demonstrate your support system will supply enough power over the life of the system in the extreme environments.
On the other hand, there are the "let's use measured power only" theorist's that tend to overlook that this data is in a controlled (lab) environment; that it only provides a snapshot of total power consumption where equipment may not be at peak load capacities.
Generally speaking, not all equipment consumes max power all the time.
One approach I often use is 70% to 80% of the total of name plate ratings (the old 80/20 rule); see 80% of max ratings 20% of the time.
What are your methods of arriving at efficient total power load consumption analysis for systems of many equipment items?
Good Answers: