Previous in Forum: 30kw EOT Crane Motor Taking 235A Agaisnt FLC of 49A??   Next in Forum: Datacenter Power Usage and Pollution
Close
Close
Close
19 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Active Contributor

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 11

Rotating Machines Back Protection

09/24/2012 2:35 PM

I am working on the BS and I want to know what the NEC says with regard to the following:

A 3 phase pump motor with full load 20 amps,the manufacturer recommendation is to protect the motor with 40 amps. mccb (with mag. and thermal protection) and starter unit (contactor 30 amps and overload 18-24 amps).

My queries are:

1.will the selected cable size be matching with the circuit breaker size or the motor over load setting?(of course the voltage drop will be considered).

2. BS in their clause for rotating machines say that circuit breakers,starters and cables should be selected to carry not less than motor full load amps. while in some other clause says that Iz should be 1.45 times the circuit breaker size on which the circuit parameters to be selected.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: India
Posts: 1246
Good Answers: 34
#1

Re: Rotating Machines Back Protection

09/24/2012 2:48 PM

The selected cable size should match with the circuit breaker size.

Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 11
#6
In reply to #1

Re: Rotating Machines Back Protection

09/24/2012 11:48 PM

I agree.

Reason being that specially in situations the motor starter is installed near rotating machine equipment far from the circuit breaker protecting the circuit,the cable should be matching with circuit breaker size.

.Assuming the starter over load did not trip at overcurrent,either due to defects or wrong selection of overload or overload is dismantled for replacement awaiting delivery or loose connection on the input terminals of contactor then the role of circuit breaker is needed to operate at overload.This necessates that cable feeding the stater should withstand 1.45 times the circuit breaker rating .

Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#8
In reply to #6

Re: Rotating Machines Back Protection

09/25/2012 12:04 AM

That is certainly not correct in the NEC (U.S.), and I doubt that it is correct in any Code.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1604
Good Answers: 63
#2

Re: Rotating Machines Back Protection

09/24/2012 4:46 PM

Joshi is correct for most applications. The NEC will allow the over current device to be up to 250 % of the FLA. The reason is because the overloads will protect the cable and motor. The breaker protects against fault current.

This will allow the breaker to with stand the starting amps with out tripping.
The conductor size needs to be 1.25 x FLA. The conductor size does not need to match the breaker size.

Please reply back to let us know if you understand.

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Active Contributor

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 11
#7
In reply to #2

Re: Rotating Machines Back Protection

09/25/2012 12:02 AM

You are telling that the over current device to be up to 250% of FLA to protect cable and motor and the cable to be selected for 125% of FLA.The cable might get overheated due to problems on the motor side and the circuit breaker does not trip still.

Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Active Contributor

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 11
#18
In reply to #7

Re: Rotating Machines Back Protection

09/25/2012 10:15 AM

As you stated overcurrent and over load,I understood that you meant overcurrent in circuit breaker and over load in starter unit respectively.However,you are assuming the starter unit is in MCC and cable commencing from MCC to motor isolator next to motor.What will be the case if a local control panel including starter is located next to motor and cable commencing from circuit breaker in switchboard to the local control panel?will the overload be protecting the cable and motor? It will just protect the final connection from starter to motor in addition to motor.

Register to Reply
Guru
Canada - Member - If there is a way to screw someting up, there is someone to do so! Safety - Hazmat - New Member

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Iqaluit, NU. Canada
Posts: 1854
Good Answers: 140
#3

Re: Rotating Machines Back Protection

09/24/2012 4:51 PM

Question 1...

Neither... According to the CEC (the NEC is similar) the motor conductors should be sized at not less than 125% of the full load current of the mortor.

Quyestion 2...

The answer for cirrcuit breakers has alot to do with what type of circuit breaker you plan on using.

If you have additional details... provide them.

__________________
Joe Contractor to Electrical Inspector, "What do you mean you are going to make me follow the code?".
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Hyderabad, India.
Posts: 92
Good Answers: 2
#4

Re: Rotating Machines Back Protection

09/24/2012 6:12 PM

NEC-US is well defined code for each and every item of electrical.

For your question, you did not define the type of motor whether it is Squirrel cage motor or Wound rotor.

Please refer the NEC Table 430.52. It gives CB rating for different kinds and conditions of the AC motors. The CB rating is given in percent of the motor full load current.

The branch feeder cable size shall be 125% times full load motor current as per Article 430.22.

__________________
B.E, M.I.E, M.S
Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 11
#10
In reply to #4

Re: Rotating Machines Back Protection

09/25/2012 12:20 AM

It is squirrel cage motor.As we know,the selected circuit breaker rating differs if it is protecting a direct on line started motor or reduced voltage starting unit.We follow tables provided by manufacturers for this purpose,

Register to Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#11
In reply to #10

Re: Rotating Machines Back Protection

09/25/2012 12:30 AM

!4 minutes before, you were following the BS and IEC, and at some other time the NEC. These sources all differ; you can't follow them all.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 11
#16
In reply to #11

Re: Rotating Machines Back Protection

09/25/2012 9:54 AM

I just want to know what NEC tells about these issues.I follow the BS standards but sometimes I come across such issues in projects design based on NEC.

Register to Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#17
In reply to #16

Re: Rotating Machines Back Protection

09/25/2012 10:14 AM

Post 2 summarized decently.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1604
Good Answers: 63
#5

Re: Rotating Machines Back Protection

09/24/2012 10:46 PM

Mushtag

Do you use the NEC at your location?

Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 11
#9
In reply to #5

Re: Rotating Machines Back Protection

09/25/2012 12:06 AM

We follow BS and IEC

Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#12
In reply to #9

Re: Rotating Machines Back Protection

09/25/2012 3:08 AM

Is BS7671 unclear on this topic, then?

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Hyderabad, India.
Posts: 92
Good Answers: 2
#13

Re: Rotating Machines Back Protection

09/25/2012 4:15 AM

Dear Mr. wareagle

I am working in Saudi Arabia. I have been using NEC in design since 1980.

Thank you

__________________
B.E, M.I.E, M.S
Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Resting under the Major Oak
Posts: 4347
Good Answers: 181
#14

Re: Rotating Machines Back Protection

09/25/2012 5:53 AM

BS7671 435-01-01 recomends following BS EN60947-4-1. Which basicly boils down to "follow the manufacturers instructions".

__________________
The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated.
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Hyderabad, India.
Posts: 92
Good Answers: 2
#15

Re: Rotating Machines Back Protection

09/25/2012 7:35 AM

It is advisable to use local code for motor ptotection by CB and Cable sizing or if motor is a special type use the manufacturer recommendation.

If you do not find the local code or supplier recommendation then go to other location code to minize the error.

__________________
B.E, M.I.E, M.S
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1604
Good Answers: 63
#19

Re: Rotating Machines Back Protection

09/25/2012 3:01 PM

Abdel Quote " You are telling that the over current device to be up to 250% of FLA to protect cable and motor and the cable to be selected for 125% of FLA.The cable might get overheated due to problems on the motor side and the circuit breaker does not trip."

As stated in the second post, the breaker does not protect the cable from overloads. The motor overloads take the motor off line and protect it and the conductors.

Abdel Quote "I just want to know what NEC tells about these issues.I follow the BS standards but sometimes I come across such issues in projects design based on NEC."

As stated in the second post.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 19 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

ABDEL AZIZ YOUSEF (6); Joshi (1); Mushtaq Hussainh (3); North of 60 (1); PWSlack (1); TonyS (1); Tornado (3); wareagle (3)

Previous in Forum: 30kw EOT Crane Motor Taking 235A Agaisnt FLC of 49A??   Next in Forum: Datacenter Power Usage and Pollution

Advertisement