Previous in Forum: Is Code for Cable   Next in Forum: Power Electronics Question
Close
Close
Close
22 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Member

Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5

Current Reduction Thru' VFD

01/30/2013 10:46 AM

In a 3phase Squirrel Cage 415V 50Hz Induction Motor, is Current Reduction possible beyond its No-Load Current / Magnetising Current by reducing Voltage & Frequency Proportionately thru' Variable Frequency Drive at reduced speed of the motor?

Register to Reply
Pathfinder Tags: Current Reduction thru' VFD
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#1

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

01/30/2013 10:48 AM

Yes, though undesirable, as all it does is turn the motor into a convection heater until such time as something trips/fails/burns out/blows up.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California, USA, where the Godless live next door to God.
Posts: 4665
Good Answers: 804
#2

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

01/30/2013 11:48 AM

Before a lot of us jump to conclusions about what you asked, maybe you could enlighten us on what you are trying to get at. Is this related to energy consumption, limited current capacity from your line, what?

__________________
** All I every really wanted to be, was... A LUMBERJACK!.**
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User

Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 147
Good Answers: 9
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

01/30/2013 1:35 PM

C'mon now! Jumping to conclusions is all the exercise I get any more

__________________
You have to actively participate in the manifestations of your own joys and good fortunes - they are not ready made for the taking, they are available for the making.
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Member

Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5
#9
In reply to #2

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

01/31/2013 12:52 AM

Reduction in Energy Consumption.

Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California, USA, where the Godless live next door to God.
Posts: 4665
Good Answers: 804
#12
In reply to #9

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

01/31/2013 10:40 AM

Ok then.

Fist off, recognize that the reduction of current alone does not automatically reduce ENERGY consumption. This is a very common trick used to sell unnecessary equipment. Be VERY WARY of anyone who attempts to convince you otherwise. There is just no truth to it. Current is a PART of the energy equation, but not the whole thing.

Energy is simply defined as POWER required to accomplish a task through a defined period of TIME, nothing else. So in order to SAVE energy within the same time period, you have to reduce the power. POWER to do a task can be defined as the WORK performed, plus any LOSSES in the conversion of one source of energy to another. So in the case of an electric motor, you are converting electrical energy to kinetic energy, or movement (usually rotational but the recent advent of linear motors messed up that statement).

__________________
** All I every really wanted to be, was... A LUMBERJACK!.**
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California, USA, where the Godless live next door to God.
Posts: 4665
Good Answers: 804
#13
In reply to #12

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

01/31/2013 11:05 AM

So to save energy, one must either reduce the losses, or reduce the amount of work being performed. In many cases unfortunately, sales people use VFDs to show a user the reduction of current and claim this is a reduction of energy, but in reality it is a reduction of the work being performed. So yes, you are saving energy in a relative sense, but you are doing less work as well. The ultimate expression of this concept is what my colleagues were teasing about: turning it off completely is the ultimate "energy savings" technique.

That is not to say, however, that VFDs cannot save real energy, they can. But they do so by eliminating LOSSES in a system. So before you can ASSume that a VFD can save energy, you must FIRST identify where the losses are in an overall system that is running at design speed without a VFD. Therein lies the devil of the details. Without knowing the ENTIRE story of your application, it is impossible to say whether a VFD will be able to save real energy or not.

One REMOTE and minor possibility of energy savings potential in ALL AC motor applications is that motors have losses inherent in them from just the basics of the iron and copper becoming a working motor. A small fraction of those losses are related to the applied voltage. IF THE MOTOR IS UNLOADED but for some unknown reason must be spinning anyway, then there is a small fraction of that small fraction of the losses that can be reduced by reducing the voltage at the motor terminals. But as the losses are reduced, so is the work capacity of the motor, hence the requirement that the motor be unloaded. So to take advantage, a system must be capable of detecting that the motor needs tp work harder again and get out of that energy saving mode. All VFDs are capable of doing this. However whether or not your application can take advantage of that is subject to evaluation, and must always be compared to just turning it off when not it use.

It can however be said that it will NEVER be worth installing a VFD just for this purpose. There must be some other advantage to using variable speed. If there is, the application must ALSO be required to be running when there is virtually no load on the motor. Those circumstances are much more rare than the salesmen want you to believe.

__________________
** All I every really wanted to be, was... A LUMBERJACK!.**
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 139
Good Answers: 6
#14
In reply to #13

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

01/31/2013 11:41 AM

Not so fast . . . ! An idling motor does not do any work, but it does have all kinds of losses that can be reduced - without actually stopping the motor. These loses are the copper losses in the winding and the hysteresis core loses. These can be substantially reduced by running the motor at a reduced voltage - using a VFD or other means.

Think of it this way, . . . a loaded motor runs at 99% of synchronous speed, while a unloaded motor runs at 99.99% of synchronous speed. You can safely reduce the voltage to a value that will reduce the motor speed down to 99% synchronous without suffering any ill effects. Depending on the design of the motor, this is likely to be less then 1/2 the nameplate voltage. With half the voltage running the motor - you will have about 1/2 the current, . . . low and behold, the copper losses have just been reduced by 75% - down to 25% of losses. The same savings apply to the hysteresis losses in the core.

Similar savings can be obtained when running a partially loaded motor at reduced voltage

Try it, . . . you will like it!!

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Been there, done that. Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 15600
Good Answers: 981
#15
In reply to #14

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

01/31/2013 5:37 PM

No, no ,no, noooo. If a motor is not doing any work then it has zero efficiency. The copper and core losses may be reduced in the motor design process to the point that self heating damage of a stalled motor will not be a problem but a VFD does not change the motor design. Now a VFD may improve a particular induction motor by keeping the slip in the sweet spot of the torque curve for the rotor design. If you have instead a brushed universal motor then you've wasted your money. Changing the supply frequency on these motors is pointless.

__________________
"Don't disturb my circles." translation of Archimedes last words
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California, USA, where the Godless live next door to God.
Posts: 4665
Good Answers: 804
#16
In reply to #14

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

01/31/2013 6:17 PM
  • "Not so fast . . . ! An idling motor does not do any work, but it does have all kinds of losses that can be reduced - without actually stopping the motor. "

I basically said that there was savings to be had (without the technical jargon). The issue about shutting it down is, they can be realized ONLY if the motor is unloaded. If it is unloaded, why is it running at all?

But come on now... "all kinds of losses"? I2R, or "copper losses", are strictly based on current through the windings, they will NOT change significantly with voltage reduction. If you have reduced the motor LOAD by 50%, you have already reduced the copper losses, but you CANNOT reduce the copper losses more than the amount of load reduction!

So the only other change in copper losses is perhaps from the miniscule amount of current change that can be effected by reducing the magnetizing current. This entire concept is often over blown however. When a motor is stated as being 95% efficient, that means that at WORST, there are only 5% losses. Of those 5% losses, roughly 25% are magnetic hysteresis losses, so now we are looking at 1% of the motor power. Of that 1%, you can reduce those losses by maybe 25% through voltage reduction, so now the energy reduction is 0.25%. Even if you directly correlate that to current, the net effect on the copper losses is now a small fraction of that fraction of a fraction, in other words barely measurable.

And by the way, AC motors do not run at 99.99% of synchronous speed, more like 97% or 95%, it is defined as the "% slip" in the motor specifications. That changes only with loading and it is that increase in slip that accounts for motor working current.

__________________
** All I every really wanted to be, was... A LUMBERJACK!.**
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 4)
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California, USA, where the Godless live next door to God.
Posts: 4665
Good Answers: 804
#17
In reply to #16

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

01/31/2013 8:00 PM

LOL, voted "Off Topic because I dare to speak the truth?

__________________
** All I every really wanted to be, was... A LUMBERJACK!.**
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Member

Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5
#19
In reply to #17

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

02/06/2013 6:52 AM

I Agree that YOU got very close to the Truth. Can I take it specific that my question replies to a "NO" from you?

Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California, USA, where the Godless live next door to God.
Posts: 4665
Good Answers: 804
#20
In reply to #19

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

02/06/2013 9:36 PM

"Can I take it specific that my question replies to a "NO" from you?"

If I interpret your question correctly, that you want to reduce ENERGY (from your subsequent response) simply by reducing the voltage and frequency, then the answer would be a QUALIFIED no. If there is some reduction in losses that corresponds to the reduction in speed, then the answer would be yes.

For example, let's say it is a centrifugal pump. The Affinity Law is often quoted as a magical energy savings benefit of putting a VFD on a pump, because it holds that the energy consumed when flow is reduced by changing the shaft speed of the pump drops at the cube of the flow reduction. So by reducing the flow with a VFD, it saves energy. But reducing the flow WITHOUT a VFD, for example with a valve, ALSO saves energy, or rather REQUIRES less energy inherently to begin with. They just fail to bring that up.

But that does not mean a VFD does not save energy in that situation, because it does. The use of the Affinity Law by changing the motor speed drops the energy consumption FASTER within the middle of the speed range than just reducing the flow by restriction. Plus with the valve, the drop in flow has a corresponding drop in pressure across the valve as well as losses in turbulence in the pipe that is expressed in heat (although difficult to notice because it is spread out in the flow). So reducing the flow by reducing the speed with a VFD, eliminates the LOSSES in the valve restriction as well. So using a VFD does indeed save energy COMPARED to reducing the flow with a valve. But then again, if you do not need to VARY the flow and just want a permanent reduction, guess what? The VFD then will WASTE energy compared to trimming the impeller! Trimming the impeller has the exact same Affinity Law effect on power consumption. The only problem is, it is a permanent solution; you can't "un-trim" it when you want more flow again.

So my real answer to your question of can I save energy on a motor by reducing the frequency and voltage is, it just is not that simplistic.

__________________
** All I every really wanted to be, was... A LUMBERJACK!.**
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5
#21
In reply to #20

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

02/08/2013 1:36 AM

Kindly Clarify with respect to " beyond its No-Load Current / Magnetising Current " part of my question.

Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 84
Good Answers: 1
#18
In reply to #13

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

02/02/2013 1:27 AM

I like it when you explain these things in so much detail.

Thank you.

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Been there, done that. Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 15600
Good Answers: 981
#4

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

01/30/2013 2:30 PM

What do you need a VFD for, you can reduce the current to zero by opening the contactor.

No current leads to no motion thus there's no problem.

__________________
"Don't disturb my circles." translation of Archimedes last words
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Cd. Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico.
Posts: 1023
Good Answers: 69
#5

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

01/30/2013 2:49 PM

I assume that you can't afford stopping and starting your load at certain times, either for current surges or mechanical inconveniences; you can drop the freq. output of your drive, but do program an auxiliary output to turn on when running at idle speed and use it to start a an external fan to cool your motor.

Compare the savings against the consumption of your fan before you proceed.

Regards

__________________
No hay conocimiento ni herramienta que sustituya al sentido comun.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#6

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

01/30/2013 3:21 PM

Sure, but the motor won't do any work, or it will burn up.

So, if your goal is to wring the last penny out of your fixed costs, I'd look somewhere else to cut corners.

Otherwise, use a smaller motor.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South of Minot North Dakota
Posts: 8376
Good Answers: 775
#7

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

01/30/2013 8:52 PM

If its running purely unloaded then yes you can do a moderate supply voltage and related no load power consumption drop a without causing any issues with the motor.

most 415 VAC 50 Hz (480 VAC American 60HZ) can stay running at near full speed unloaded at as little as 1/3/ to 1/4 of their normal drive voltage with no issues at all.

Its rather easy to do as well. All thats needed for the basic circuit is a contactor set that switches the power from the normal 415 VAC circuit to a lower voltage circuit of the same phasing configuration once the motor is up to speed but not carrying any load.

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 139
Good Answers: 6
#8

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

01/30/2013 11:16 PM

Good induction motors are designed to operate most efficiently in the 80-100% load range. They become much less efficient when operated at reduced loads - typically very inefficient when operated near zero load.

Such induction motors, operating at reduced load, will become more efficient when operating at reduced voltage. You do not want to change the frequency - as this will change the speed of the motor.

Thus for example, a motor operating 50% load may be most efficient when operating near 90% voltage. Similarly this motor may be most efficient at 20% load when operating near 75% voltage.

The actual improvement in efficiency when operating at reduced load and reduced voltage will depend on many factors like the copper losses, iron losses and air gap.

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#10

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

01/31/2013 3:33 AM

In summary, then, just turn the thing off.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2008
Location: CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, INDIA.
Posts: 1851
Good Answers: 65
#11

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

01/31/2013 9:36 AM

Dear Mr. Kashinath Saha

The answer for your Question is NO, and should NOT ATTEMPT to reduce Voltage.

Secondly you have not mentioned, whether the Motor is suitable for Variable Frequency/Speed operation. You should NOT put ordinary motor for VFD operation, especially below 60% of Rated speed - otherwise, the cooling of Motor will be affected.

DHAYANANDHAN.S

Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5
#22
In reply to #11

Re: Current Reduction Thru' VFD

02/08/2013 1:52 AM

Respected Sir,

The Motor in my question is suitable for Variable Frequency/Speed operation. Shall be thankful if you clarify a bit more in favour of your answer "No".

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 22 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

dhayanandhan (1); JRaef (6); KASHINATH SAHA (4); lyn (1); Mike W (1); muditmah (1); olehwi (2); PWSlack (2); redfred (2); tcmtech (1); Yahlasit (1)

Previous in Forum: Is Code for Cable   Next in Forum: Power Electronics Question

Advertisement