Previous in Forum: Starting of Induction Motor   Next in Forum: Electrical Help
Close
Close
Close
6 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Active Contributor

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 12

CT Magnetisation Current Ie

04/15/2013 8:34 AM

Hi

We are testing Current Transformer part of 400 kV GIS. During excitation characterstic testing, the excitation current Ie at Vk is more than rated value (on the name plate). The same current as per factory test is more than Site value. The manufacturer states that the reason is due to interferance of switchgear capacitance and Grading capacitors of Circuit breaker.

However, as per IEC the excitation current shall not be more than name plate value. Can any one help me whether the manufacturer is arguing right?

Register to Reply
Pathfinder Tags: CT excitation current
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2061
Good Answers: 169
#1

Re: CT Magnetisation Current Ie

04/15/2013 9:00 AM

Just a thought!

Generally, the name plate excitation current for a CT is given at a fraction of the Vkp, such as Imag < x mA at VkP/2 or at VkP/4. If so, at VkP, the I mag would definitely be more. Pl. cross check for this.

Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 12
#2
In reply to #1

Re: CT Magnetisation Current Ie

04/15/2013 9:23 AM

Thank you for advice. However, do you think Ie will be more if measured with installed in switchgear than measured seperately?

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#3

Re: CT Magnetisation Current Ie

04/15/2013 12:31 PM

These tests are run in a specific way for a reason. It's time to hire an engineer. Quit guessing.

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 139
Good Answers: 6
#4

Re: CT Magnetisation Current Ie

04/16/2013 1:41 AM

First - "what are the actual numbers"? Saying current is "more" is a meaningless expression. Lets see the specifications and the test numbers.

Secondly - switching and grading capacitors do not cause "interference" - so what is the manufacturer talking about? Perhaps he means that the capacitors will draw a bit of current if voltage is applied to them ? ? You can always test with the associated breaker OPEN and then CLOSED to what difference this will make. Also, the capacitoes are very small - in the order of 1000 picofarads - thus will draw a minute current. In addition to this - this current is "capacitive" and should reduce the "inductive" current of the CT.

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Active Contributor

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 12
#5
In reply to #4

Re: CT Magnetisation Current Ie

04/16/2013 10:31 AM

Thank you for your message OLEHWI. It is very relevant asnwer to the question. Adding to your view point, there would be very less voltage generated in the primary (also open circuited) due to applied voltage on the secondary of CT.

The other details for typical CTs are: 4000/1, >300V, <30 mA.

FAT values for Vk, Ie - 29.6 mA @ 300 V

At Site_ 36.68 mA @ 300V.

Also there is lot of difference in FAT values of different CTs. For example, the range of Ie at Vk varied from 17.6 mA to 29.6 mA for different CTs (Same ratio, same name plate details).

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Eastern Arizona mountains on Route 666 about a mile from God's country
Posts: 1676
Good Answers: 122
#6

Re: CT Magnetisation Current Ie

04/16/2013 11:09 AM

Disconnect and isolate the capacitors, then run the test and see if the current value decreases below the nameplate acceptable value.

If the current readings decrease to a lower acceptable value then you know the capacitors are the culprit.

If the readings do not decrease to a lower acceptable value then there is definitely something else wrong with the CT circuit.

It may be a manufacturing fault but it could also be something inflicted during the installation/construction.

__________________
They said; "Brain size?" I heard; "Train size?" so I said: "I'll take a small one, thank you."
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 6 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

bonala123 (2); electricalexpert65 (1); lyn (1); olehwi (1); SHOCKHISCAN (1)

Previous in Forum: Starting of Induction Motor   Next in Forum: Electrical Help

Advertisement