European Race Origin

The origin is Europe.

It started in the beginning.

It came from Europe.

Yes, go to the library and ask the reference librarian.

Google will answer all your questions.

I know the Old Egyptians ,Syrians, and Chineses had a great history and civilizations more than 7,000 years ago - what about the European race ? Any information about old civilization was there at any old time ?

I think a study of languishes we probably help you, I'm not sure but I think they originally came from an area north of India.

Regards JD.

Every human on the planet came from Africa. Current theory was this took place 60K to 74Kyears ago. Those that migrated further north, and had to wear clothing to survive the cold conditions, had problems with enough vitamin D, and via natural selection the level of melanin of those that survived was reduced to lower levels.

Races are nothing more then groups of peoples (tribes) that over several generations intermixed to result in common facial and body features.

If originated in Africa how did they go to South america without any advanced crafts to cross the atlantic?.

That did not happen in the same time period, as leaving Africa. Your assuming they had no water craft (Australia required 60 mile crossing, during ice age, via sea craft, current theory +30Kyears ago).

The move to the America's is still being debated. Anywhere from 12K to 35K years ago. And this would have happened during the ice age, where sea levels were ~300 feet lower then current levels. So land bridge existed. There's evidence of both Asian from north Pacific crossing, as well Clovis from north Atlantic crossing.

Well, all these theories are just not more than assumptions - could be completely wrong.

As far as I know Europeans race belongs to "Japheth", one of Noah's sons.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japheth

Well, that is just bull puckey.

Assuming you are not just a troll, I will refer you to the National Geographic Genographic Study . Or this one from Sci News. Not assumptions....science! Could these theories be wrong? Um...No, not a chance. They are theories, not half baked hypotheses. (learn the difference please...) Could YOU be wrong? Yes.

If you ARE a troll, then blow it out your innertube.

It is just barely possible that you actually think there actually WAS a person named Japheth. In which case there is NO hope for rational discussion because what you "believe" just doesn't matter.

Well, I have no time to go through all these articles ! Please summarize what you want to say in brief way.

You don't have time?

What's your hurry?

Summary is easy.... The first link has a movie less than two minutes long. Summarizes quite nicely.

Watch it. Here are some lovely graphics and better summaries of the complex movements of human beings over the last sixty thousand years than even I can do.

The second link summarizes how DNA has been used to determine the origin of people out of Africa, through the middle east where they split into several directions, and covered the earth.

And this link proves with science (http://www.worldology.com/Europe/Europe_Articles/out_of_africa.htm - sorry, link no longer available) that the concept of "race" is very problematic and illusionary, since it seems that "race" is only an illusion created by easily understood and accepted natural selection and local adaptation.

There you go. Neat summaries. If you want to know more, then I suggest you take more time.

Without any gadgets how did they travel across rivers,mountains,marshy lands, precipieces,ice/snow etc?.

ummm....walking? They had lots of time after all. Even I could walk from Kenya to the bottom of South America if I had seventy thousand years to do it!

Well, it's safe to assume they didn't use a low-cost-model airline.

Natives of canada,us,amazon,etc resembles that of chinese,koreans & japanese but australians resemble south asians/africans while europeans belong to another category,why?.

If all races are from same origin why some eat with fingers,others with chop sticks while another group with fork and spoons. Not only that even dress,music,dance,food preparation,religious practice,weapons,alphabet even animals,birds,trees etc differs from region to region. I believe that man originated from different kinds of animals into monkeys,then to humans in different parts of the world. DNA test of different kinds of monkeys and humans is necessary.

Poor reasoning, unworthy of your generally well thought out replies! Such testing has been done, and analysis has revealed that the fossil record is substatially correct.

Nobody thinks we were ever monkeys. Perhaps monkeys came from the same ancestors that we did, but they used a different road to get to here. The split occured about 200,000 years ago. Not surprisingly, there are very few fossils from that time, but there are enough to determine that there were several branches. Some found each other later (there are Neanderthal genes tucked away in the cro magnon genes for instance, showing that there was some late, if minor contact). There may have been many false starts, and perhaps many migrations which marched into oblivion, the oldest we know for sure was some 92,000 years ago. However, of the ones that survived, we can state with authority that it was one particularly successful migration about 70,000 years ago.

Never been to a European race myself, but I think they usually originate with a chequered flag.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auto_racing

They originate with a green flag and terminate with the checkered flag.

I oughta know, I've wrecked some expensive race cars in my day.

I am from the Middle East area, I can tell you that the origin of the old Yemen people is from Africa ( Ethiopia) - and those people moved later to north of the Arabia land ,which is known now as Saudi Arabia.

So, I can ensure you that the original Arabs people are Africans in the origin.

That is remarkable Marzoky, that memories would be so strong! Have you, or they participated in the National Geographic Genome project? They especially want people whose ancestors have lived in one place for as long as possible. You get the purest results that way.

Why do these topics always employ Anonymous Posers? [sic] (intentional).

I think they are trolls myself......so often I don't trouble myself with 'em.

There was a bare (less than 1 percent) chance that this fellow is NOT a troll, that he really does want real answers to real questions. Good enough odds for me. A sure sign of trolldom is that they won't read the links, that they always want cut and dried answers that that have to be over simplified. They can then cut the oversimplified answers apart. Pastors, Jehovah Witnesses, evangelical Catholics, National Socialist Parties and those with an agenda are past masters at this. They don't ask the question to get it answered, but to start a "dialogue", which turns into a monologue. When they don't know sxxx, they are trolls. When they know a little bit, they are dangerous. When they know a lot, they are CR4 members. CR4 members, of course, know better than to try to troll other CR4 members....the tolerance level for bullsxxx of most of them is VERY low, and BS recognition is VERY highly developed.

You will note that several of our members HAVE concluded that the OP is a troll, and are treating him as such. Ah well. If it walks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck, perhaps it IS a duck.