Recently a large fire at a Deitz & Watson warehouse was allowed to burn longer due to the reluctance of the local fire chief to send his men up on the roof due to the large amount of solar panels installed up there.
See:http://www.nj.com/burlington/index.ssf/2013/09/dietz_and_watson_warehouse_fire_solar_panels_make_battling_blaze_much_harder_officials_say.html
Has anyone had similar experience with emergency responders having a reluctance to go in where "green" energy such as solar or wind power exists due to the fact that these are units which can not be controlled by simply flipping a breaker to remove the source of power from the area? They are concerned that any remaining units will continue to generate power as long as there is sunlight or wind.
Many wind units can be shut down as is done when the wind is too high or too low but unless it is nighttime, solar cells will generate power. Since solar cells generate DC and the voltage depends on the method -number of cells in series/parallel set-up are they being overly conservative in their approach?
Comments rated to be Good Answers:
Comments rated to be "almost" Good Answers: