Previous in Forum: Difference Between KGF Per Square Cenimeter & PN Specified As Pipe Units   Next in Forum: Cast Iron Failure
Close
Close
Close
8 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7025
Good Answers: 207

Move Over Copper and Graphene

12/02/2013 10:02 AM
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#1

Re: move over copper and graphene

12/02/2013 10:10 AM

Interesting, thanks.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#2

Re: Move Over Copper and Graphene

12/02/2013 1:18 PM

So, right now, it's equivalent to Unobtainium?

I can remember when scientists toiled for years to come up with a revolutionary product. Now, they're doing it every month or so.

Makes my pinhead spin.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: by the beach in Florida
Posts: 33392
Good Answers: 1817
#3

Re: Move Over Copper and Graphene

12/02/2013 6:02 PM

Ah... just a few more percentage points, and the perpetual motion device will finally be possible....

__________________
All living things seek to control their own destiny....this is the purpose of life
Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Musician - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 523
Good Answers: 17
#6
In reply to #3

Re: Move Over Copper and Graphene

12/03/2013 11:48 AM

So is NOW the time to invest?

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 650
Good Answers: 16
#7
In reply to #6

Re: Move Over Copper and Graphene

12/03/2013 8:31 PM

23 years ago the international TIN agreement 'fell over'.
Tin as a 'replacement for copper and graphene' could be another way of 'engineering' a new range of uses for value adding tin. Time to invest ... and interesting side question.

__________________
DY
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 650
Good Answers: 16
#4

Re: Move Over Copper and Graphene

12/02/2013 10:50 PM

Pewter with a very high tin content (and a low melt temp) could be used in 3D printing to make 3D 'printed circuit boards', akin to high tin content in stanene. May need insulating guide support tracks in a dual head 3D printer so the pewter deposits are contained.

__________________
DY
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: About 4000 miles from the center of the earth (+/-100 mi)
Posts: 9912
Good Answers: 1141
#5

Re: Move Over Copper and Graphene

12/03/2013 7:53 AM

Room temperature superconductor!

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 633
Good Answers: 13
#8

Re: Move Over Copper and Graphene

12/04/2013 5:36 PM

Stanene is a theorized material most likely simlilar to unobtanium. The writer of this article spoke of 60 miles of copper wire in complex chips...bullCR4p. The substrate bonding wires would be lucky to reach 6 feet, and they're usually NOT copper. More government grant money?

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 8 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Don from Oz (2); geraldpaxton (1); lyn (1); PWSlack (1); reward54 (1); Rixter (1); SolarEagle (1)

Previous in Forum: Difference Between KGF Per Square Cenimeter & PN Specified As Pipe Units   Next in Forum: Cast Iron Failure

Advertisement