Previous in Forum: Another Attempt to Distribute Energy the Tesla Way   Next in Forum: Cable to Connect UPS Relay Card to DCS I/O.
Close
Close
Close
7 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Associate

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Chennai
Posts: 40

Clarification on Tariff Meters

06/16/2014 12:43 PM

Dear All,
We need to test and Install Tariff Energy Meters for our 132 kV substation for a CT ratio of 400/1 and VT ratio of 132/Rt3 / 110/Rt 3/110/Rt3. When I reviewed routine Test certificate given by the manufacturer, the Full load current error was found to be 0.08. i.e for a 1 Amps.
But during acceptance testing, The Meter indication showed only 0.9 Amps for a current injection of 1 Amps from Omicron kit. My doubt is with an error of 0.08, the Meter indication should have been 0.92 . i.e the meter should have indicated atleast 2 digits after the decimal point. Since it is a tariff meter, The exact value of CT secondary is very critical. Similarly PT value indicated 63.5 V. PF stood at 1.00 (unity). On asking the Factory personal who imported the Meter from overseas, we were told that Ampere reading is always shown in single digit after decimal and PF is unity because it is injected from Omicron kit. Is it the correct way of indication of meter used for tariff purpose. Kindly help me out. Please let me know if any further information is required.

__________________
"Engineering is Passion"
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Liverpool, NY
Posts: 961
Good Answers: 131
#1

Re: Clarification on Tariff Meters

06/16/2014 3:50 PM

You didn't mention the manufacturer or model of the meter, nor any of its nameplate information. That would be helpful to you. ALso, you should have the instruction manual in your hands.

The 0.08, I suspect, is percent error, not absolute error on 1.00 amps. 8% on a tariff or revenue meter is totally unacceptable error level, but 0.08% would be more like what I might expect to see.

If the meter's display merely truncates the current reading to one digit to the right of the decimal point, then 0.92 amps looks the same as 0.9992 amps -- both would display as 0.9A (as would 0.9000 amps and 0.9999 amps). So you really can't tell from the display what the meter is reading in this case. Is there some other output (serial digital data, or pulsed kWH indication such as KYZ) available?

As for the voltage, you said that input is 110/Rt3 (110/√3 = 63.5085V). That sounds correct to me.

__________________
To get the right answers, first you need to ask the right questions.
Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Chennai
Posts: 40
#5
In reply to #1

Re: Clarification on Tariff Meters

06/17/2014 1:05 AM

Dear Sir,

Thanks for the quick response. Further details have been furnished in the Trailing post.

Kindly clarify the same.

Regards

Raghavendran.R

__________________
"Engineering is Passion"
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: chennai,India
Posts: 592
Good Answers: 19
#2

Re: Clarification on Tariff Meters

06/17/2014 12:26 AM

Dear sir

0.08 amps error on 1 Amp meter is amounting to 8% error.

Normally Tariff meters for HT consumers will have 2%. error only If you could share the the routine test results, may be I can review and offer comments if any

Best to compare the test results with the type test certificate for same type of instrument to be available with the manufacturer.

You get the meter tested with TNEB/CEIG/independant test Laboratory at Instronic Campus, Tharamani

__________________
Ramesh,Freelance Electrical/automation Consultant
Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Chennai
Posts: 40
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Clarification on Tariff Meters

06/17/2014 12:48 AM

Dear All,

I beg your pardon for not providing sufficient details related to the tariff meters. The Meter is Elster A1800 Make (Imported from Romania). Model number is A1882. The % of error mentioned by the Manufacturer is 0.08. i.e for 1 A CT input, the relevant OP should have been .9992A. But when we checked yesterday, the meter was showing a truncated value of 0.9 A.

Also the power OP in MW was showing for CT and PT secondary inputs and not for the primary values. ie. Our Full load current is 200 A. The CT ratio selected was 400/1A. The Power OP indicated in display should have been for Primary CT and PT values. Is it the usual way if indication of Tariff power.

__________________
"Engineering is Passion"
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: chennai,India
Posts: 592
Good Answers: 19
#7
In reply to #3

Re: Clarification on Tariff Meters

06/18/2014 12:16 AM

The instrument has to be configured for proper display and output.Generally these instruments will display parameters of primary value.

Some times display may not be perfect due to digital display restrictions.

You may take the output in print form and verify.

Gothru the instrument manual for all these instructions carefully.

__________________
Ramesh,Freelance Electrical/automation Consultant
Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Chennai
Posts: 40
#4
In reply to #2

Re: Clarification on Tariff Meters

06/17/2014 1:05 AM

Dear Sir,

Thanks for the quick response. Further details have been furnished in the Trailing post.

Kindly clarify the same.

Regards

Raghavendran.R

__________________
"Engineering is Passion"
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Edinburgh, Bonnie Scotland
Posts: 1335
Good Answers: 23
#6

Re: Clarification on Tariff Meters

06/17/2014 1:28 AM

With many of these meters, the readout is set to 'integer' by default. When you find the full users manual, there should be a way to set it to 'floating point'. The meters I use are RS485/MODBUS connection, and take some digging to find the correct registers to modify to obtain the desired functionality.

__________________
Madness is all in the mind
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 7 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

GM1964 (1); PeterT (1); Raghavendran R (3); ramvinod (2)

Previous in Forum: Another Attempt to Distribute Energy the Tesla Way   Next in Forum: Cable to Connect UPS Relay Card to DCS I/O.

Advertisement