Previous in Forum: Circular OD Glass Grinding - Looking For Suppliers   Next in Forum: Industrial CV Joint Search
Close
Close
Close
11 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Member

Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 7

Heat Transfer in Poultry Processing

01/08/2015 10:48 PM

A small chicken processing plant has the following:

1. A 15,000 litres horizontal chilled water tank with spiral paddle that pushes the carcass along the tank

2. Supplementary ice added to the chilled water at 250kg per hour and chilled water is fed into the tank at 80 litres per minute having a temperature of 8 degrees celcius.

3. A chicken carcass having an average weight of 1.4kg travelling through the spiral chilled water tank washer for 8 minutes

4. The average carcass temperature before chilling is 32 degrees celcius and after chilling is 19 degrees celcius.

Appreciate your help in determing the following to reduce the carcass temperature to 8 degrees celcius:

1. Will it be best to increase the residence time of carcass by replacing the existing spiral chiller with a larger or longer one? If so, what would be the appropriate volume of the recommended tank?

2. If the tank is not replaced, how mch ice will be required to supplement the 80 l/m chilled water to reduce the carcass temperature?

3. What would be the required refrigeration capacity of the chilled water plant to supplement the ice supplied at 250kg per hour?

Thanking you in advance for your time and efforts.

Joe White

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Been there, done that. Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 15600
Good Answers: 981
#1

Re: Heat Transfer in Poultry Processing

01/08/2015 11:02 PM

It cannot be done! Heat transfer is a parabolic partial differential equation. With an infinite heat sink the lighter object will asymptotically approach the heat sink temperature.

__________________
"Don't disturb my circles." translation of Archimedes last words
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hemel Hempstead, UK
Posts: 5826
Good Answers: 322
#3
In reply to #1

Re: Heat Transfer in Poultry Processing

01/09/2015 4:46 AM

It's not as bad as that. He's got very approximately 1 litre (kg) of ice to every 20 litres of water @ 8°C so the final temperature of the water (without any chickens) would be between 4 and 5°C.

I don't think he's mentioned the number of chickens though.

__________________
If you spend all your time looking for people and things to complain about: trust me, you will find plenty to complain about.
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 7
#7
In reply to #3

Re: Heat Transfer in Poultry Processing

01/12/2015 7:19 PM

Thanks for your time.

There are 3,000 carcass averaging 1.4kg and a carcass temperature of 32 degrees celcius are travelling in a counterflow direction of the tank at 8 minutes.

Regards

Joe White

Register to Reply
2
Guru
Australia - Member - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2181
Good Answers: 255
#2

Re: Heat Transfer in Poultry Processing

01/08/2015 11:42 PM

I would first look at the process itself and get further understanding. Is the carcase movement and water movement in the same direction? (Or does the cold water come in at the end where carcases are removed?)

Contraflow means that the most heat is removed from the bath from the end where carcases are introduced, while same direction flow means that the water already warmed by the hot carcase then travels with it through the process.

You might like to do some additional experiments to further understand the process.

What is the typical temperature of carcases at each 2 minute point? You would then be able to project tank length/residence time yourself.

What is the total heat amount involved? It seems currently that you only have 50% of the necessary cooling capability. You will also need to have a lower temperature for your cooled water. (As previously pointed out you cannot get to 8 if the cooling is only at 8)

__________________
Just an Engineer from the land down under.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Member

Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 7
#5
In reply to #2

Re: Heat Transfer in Poultry Processing

01/12/2015 7:07 PM

Thank you for your reply!

Previously, both carcass and water were flowing in the same direction. I have changed the direction to counterflow and there was temperature difference noted.

A total of 3000 carcass travel through the tank within an hour having an average weight of 1.4kg and core temperature of 32 degrees celcius. The residence time is around 4 - 8 minutes.

I think the tank is small and I wan to increase its length in order to increase the carcass residence time. However, can I just replace the tank without upgrading the Ice Plant?

Regards

Joe White

Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - CNC - New Member Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 23647
Good Answers: 420
#8
In reply to #2

Re: Heat Transfer in Poultry Processing

01/13/2015 8:40 AM

You touch off on some issues I like to elaborate more.

Yes, Counterflow would be the most effective.

At you reach the approach temperature (i.e. smaller temperature differential) the heat transfer is more difficult.

You also have to determined the thermal conductivity of the caress. i.e. the ability to transfer heat (to cool).

  • your trough may have be longer
  • Increasing the temperature differential.

I don't think a recirculating pump would benefit, because the paddles are creating a turbulent flow.

__________________
“ When people get what they want, they are often surprised when they get what they deserve " - James Wood
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Member

Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 7
#9
In reply to #8

Re: Heat Transfer in Poultry Processing

01/13/2015 4:31 PM

Thanks. I will look into those as well.

Regards

Register to Reply
3
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: City of Light
Posts: 3943
Good Answers: 183
#4

Re: Heat Transfer in Poultry Processing

01/12/2015 2:35 PM

After comments which show that people many times comment without knowing what it should be said may I give you my opinion.

I made following computations based on the assumptions:

- The ice you add is to compensate the amount of heat given by the carcasses and maintain temperature constant at 8°C

You add 250 kg/h = 4.167 kg/minute. The latent melting heat of ice at 0°C is 3.33E4 J/kg, the cp of water is 1180 J/(kg*K°) this means that per minute you compensate

Q= 4.17*(3.33E4+1180*8) =1.782E5 J

Carcass is at about 90% water = 1.26 Kg. The amount of heat will be 1.26*1180*(32-19)=1.933E4 J.

If my assumptions are correct output is 1.782E5/1.933E4=9.2 carcass/min = 553/h.

Of course those values are to be taken only as order of magnitude.

Now to the cooling possibilities, carcass walls are not very thick has contact with cooling water from both sides and water heat diffusibility is not very low so that in a 1st approximation we can consider the temperature as same through the "wall".

Then the equation will be where

M= carcass mass [kg]

Cp= specific heat of carcass (assumed equal to water) [J/(kg*K°)]

t= time

α= convection coefficient [W/m²*K°]

S= convection surface [m²]

The equation can be simplified by referring all values to θe→ u= θ-θe→

Taking into consideration that M*Cp/(S*α) has the dimension of a "time" we set it to be the time constant of the cooling process "τ".

The solution will then be u= C*exp (-t/τ) with the initial condition at t=0 u= u(0)= θo -θe

θ-θe = (θo - θe)*exp(-t/τ) or θ = θe + (θo - θe)*exp(-t/τ) Based on your data the time constant is τ≈10'.

The figure shows how carcass temperature decreases versus time. It is 32°C at entry, 19°C after 8' and goes further down depending on the time it spends in the cool water (considered constant at 8°C). It is up to you which decision you take. It is now clear that, as was written, you cannot reach 8°C if the water is at this temperature. Water has a quite high convection coefficient so that a flow increase will not bring more. But as you see you can go down to ≈12°C in about 16'. This can be done either by increasing length or with 2 lines in parallel at a reduced advance speed (half of actual one) in order to maintain output. In any case more ice should be added. You can also make a economical optimization and define for instance the length (and thus the time) as function of cost per unit of length and corresponding decrease in temperature. As length increases it becomes less economical to go further.

I hope this will help more than the previous comments.

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 3)
Member

Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 7
#6
In reply to #4

Re: Heat Transfer in Poultry Processing

01/12/2015 7:15 PM

Many Thanks. Your ideas confirm what I had in mind , but not having the facts (numbers) to back it up.

I can now provide alternatives on which the final decision will be made.

Thank you once again.

Joe White.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Stoke-on-Trent, UK
Posts: 4496
Good Answers: 137
#10
In reply to #4

Re: Heat Transfer in Poultry Processing

02/07/2015 8:34 AM

I think there's a typo in the cp of water is 1180 J/(kg*K°) from? Should be 4180 J/(kg*K). BTW it's K, not K° or °K.

__________________
Give masochists a fair crack of the whip
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Stoke-on-Trent, UK
Posts: 4496
Good Answers: 137
#11
In reply to #4

Re: Heat Transfer in Poultry Processing

02/16/2015 5:31 AM

Just noticed another mistake. The latent heat of fusion of ice is 3.33E5 J/kg (= 80 cal/gm*1000*4.18) not 3.33E4.

But it means the effect of the wrong specific heat of the water is less significant!

__________________
Give masochists a fair crack of the whip
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 11 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Codemaster (2); Joe White (4); Just an Engineer (1); nick name (1); phoenix911 (1); Randall (1); redfred (1)

Previous in Forum: Circular OD Glass Grinding - Looking For Suppliers   Next in Forum: Industrial CV Joint Search

Advertisement