Electronic Test Equipment Blog Blog

Electronic Test Equipment Blog

The Electronic Test Equipment Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about test instruments, board & assembly test, inspection & test, test equipment, and anything else related to the electronic testing field. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: How Social is Your Business?   Next in Blog: Are You an Equal-Opportunity Subordinate?
Close
Close
Close
2 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Inspect? Or Test?

Posted December 11, 2009 8:26 AM

In electronics manufacturing, increasing complexity and declining feature size push test-strategies to the limit. In recent years, inspection has become an integral part of test strategies to improve results and maximize product quality. Where do you draw the lines? What do you inspect and what do you test? Do the methods overlap? Have throughput constraints forced you to test samples at certain steps in your process rather than inspecting or testing every product? Has sampling compromised your product quality or increased your field-support and warranty costs?

The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Electronic Test Equipment, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Electronic Test Equipment today.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Northeast corner of the sphere
Posts: 310
Good Answers: 7
#1

Re: Inspect? Or Test?

12/12/2009 8:55 AM

Unless it's a zero fail tolerance application, 100% inspection and testing should not be required.

The manufacturing process should be sufficiently stable to allow tested verification of samples for operating parameters.

If your componentry is coming from off-shore and they are supposedly testing everything at $0.25/day wages, I'd be suspicious and test much more. (Been there - done that - don't want to have to do it again)

It comes down to cost-benefit: what is the cost of failure and customer irritation vs the cost of inspection / testing?

__________________
How can you be two places at once when you're actually nowhere at all?
Reply
Anonymous Poster
#2

Re: Inspect? Or Test?

02/15/2010 11:32 AM

..."increasing complexity and declining feature size..."

This is the insanity of technological advancement for the sake of what? Serviceable electronics? No. Throw-away. Such a waste. I wish more "techies" would wake up to what is real and important in life... and it isn't more and more technological advancement.

My 2 cents... which these days is probably worth 0.05 cents.

Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Reply to Blog Entry 2 comments

Previous in Blog: How Social is Your Business?   Next in Blog: Are You an Equal-Opportunity Subordinate?

Advertisement